Measuring home networks with BISMark

The Broadband Internet Service BenchMARK is an open source initiative to put tools in the hands of the common Internet user that will make measurement and analyzation of home network traffic easier. It targets LAN and WAN network utilization by measuring latency, packet loss, jitter, upstream throughput, and downstream throughput. Of course gathering data isn’t worth anything unless you have a way to present it, and to that end the Project BISMark team has been developing a web interface where you can view the usage of anyone who’s running the firmware.

The project builds on top of OpenWRT, which means that you should be able to run it on any router that’s OpenWRT compatible. This includes the ubiquitous WRT54G routers and many others. We remember when DD-WRT added bandwidth monitoring as part of the standard release, which really came in handy when the stories about ISP bandwidth capping started to hit. We’re glad to see even more functionality with this package as it can be hard to really understand what is going on in your network. After the break you’ll find a video detailing the features of BISMark.

Comments

  1. Aaron says:

    “Analyzation”? The word is ‘analysis’. Jesus H. Christ, do any of you ever read what you type at any point before or after it’s posted?

  2. Kuy says:

    @Aaron +1 – the single biggest improvement that the HaD staff could make to the blog is to proofread each post. Surely there are spelling- and grammar-checking plugins for WordPress that can at least catch the simple stuff!

  3. rusty says:

    Did this grammar issue make it hard for you to understand the post? no? move on then. trolls.

  4. Adam Outler says:

    meh.. looks like they’re trying to sell routers.

  5. techie says:

    I installed it on my Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH. Bandwidth graphs aren’t working for me. The images don’t load. Their documentation on how to set it up isn’t very clear.

  6. jojo says:

    @Adam Outler

    Where does it say they are selling routers? It says they are FREE. I do not see anything about a price tag!

  7. Grazz256 says:

    @Aaron +1 – I think the media (blogs, news sites, radio, TV, etc.) in general need to take a couple of English language courses. Nothing like watching the news and having the anchor mispronounce words or use poor English. On the other hand what else am I going to rant about?

  8. tooth says:

    @rusty: brouhaha + ∞ I totally agree with you. i have dyslexia and i don’t even see the mistakes in the post i get the same type of info and what they are trying to get across.

    on to the post.
    i was looking for something like this.

  9. hackersmith says:

    Doesnt DD-WRT & Tomato firmwares already have bandwidth speed usage and total transfers per month?

    This firmware already has a bunch of extra features they dont but I doubt that normal users will want/need such abilities.

  10. Drone says:

    This is interesting. It seems this is based on OpenFlow & NOX (correct me if I’m wrong just taking a cursory look), which seem to be alive at post-time. Unfortunately, IMO the choice of OpenWrt and (especially) the Netgear WNDR3700 hardware is not good. The WNDR3700 (like the WNDR3500L) seems to have NO external antenna connection (STUPID for what is supposed to be an “Open” router). See http://www.myopenrouter.com (a Netgear site). Also, when I looked at the WNDR3500L it seems there was no fool-proof way to “unbrick” the router after hacking. The ASUS WL-520GU has a button for this (brilliant feature!). But the WL-520GU is getting hard to find these days, and is old-in-the tooth when it comes to memory, etc. (plus the USB connect is dicey, see Tomato-USB). Hmmm… seems like you could do this yourself with the likes of Iperf plus a sprinkling of scripts (Perl Melikes) and the likes of RRDTool and/or MRTG (yeah, old-school perhaps).

  11. Troy says:

    If you don’t have a Service Level Agreement (sla) your ISP hasn’t guaranteed anything. There were two phrases I had to learn working in the Telecom and Cable industries, “Best Effort Service” which is all you’re getting if you aren’t paying for an SLA, and Not Technically Feasible (NTF).

    Best Effort Service means we’ll try to provide the highest advertised speed for your service plan through our equipment, but the ISP can’t promise anything once you get past that to the open internet.

    Not Technically Feasible means what you think it means, The service you want can’t be provided because of something beyond the companies ability to resolve.

    This isn’t anything against this technology, I just hope you guys put a disclaimer somewhere so hundreds of entitled “power users” don’t run to their ISP’s thinking their getting ripped off when that may not be the case.

  12. Gert says:

    Is there an equivalent for your home electric system? Incoming frequency, voltage,…

  13. Mike Szczys says:

    I generally try not to feed the trolls, but here I go again.

    Yes, I proofread my posts. Yes, we have spell checking software (actually both in browser and in the WYSIWYG editor). ‘Analyzation’ was flagged by both but the suggested replacement was not ‘analysis’ and for some reason I didn’t come up with it myself.

    But I did take the time to look up a definition of ‘Analyzation’, it is a word.

  14. lou eney says:

    man grammer nazis please move along. I for one, don’t need to waste my time proof reading this crap; i’d like to get the info fast.

    Cool app i’ll have to check it out.

  15. mad_max says:

    @Aaron
    You know you’re on the internet, right? And you know this is a blog, right? Just making sure.

  16. Rodders says:

    @tooth
    Nice to know there are other dyslexics out there that read these posts the same way I do.

  17. Cynyr says:

    Is there something like this that is simple-ish to set up on a linux box that is a router?

    By simple, I mean no more than drop some pages in a dir served by my http server, give it access to postgresql, add a canned iptables rule, and away it goes.

  18. Ted says:

    Free router or not, the thought of swapping my heavily-tweaked DD-WRT router, for the mysterious Bismark router, is a show-stopper.

    I encourage Bismark to implement an “transparent” mode so their service can just quietly sit between modem and existing router.

    If they really want participation, they should develop a downloadable firmware, so we can flash it onto our spare OpenWRT capable equipment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 96,322 other followers