openwrt

83 Articles

This Week In Security: What’s In A Name, The AI Bugpocalypse Hits Everyone, OpenWRT Flaws, And Duress Passwords

July 31, 2026 by 21 Comments

The great thing about standards is there’s so many to pick from, right?. (Insert obligatory XKCD #927 here.) Several companies have developed naming schemes to refer to groups of attacks, and now Google has too.

Sometimes, malware, ransomware, or exploit groups name themselves: “Shinyhunters”, “LapSus$”, “Cl0p”, “Lockbit”, and so on. For the groups that don’t advertise their presence, identification and naming can be more difficult. Mostly state-run affairs that didn’t want to draw attention to themselves, these Advanced Persistent Threats (APT) groups were originally simply given numbers. APT28 refers to the Russian GRU Intelligence Directorate suspected of hacking the Democratic Party email servers, APT38 is a North Korean governmental agency involved in financial and crypto currency theft.

Multiple companies and agencies have developed naming schemes to make referring to threat groups easier, typically including a regional identifier as well. CrowdStrike naming uses name groups like “Bear” group for suspected Russian actors, “Panda” for China, “Spider” for unattributed crime groups, while Microsoft uses “Blizzard”, “Typhoon”, and “Tempest”.

Google, deciding there weren’t enough classifications already, now introduces “RELIC”, “CASTLE”, and “COMET”. Of course, each naming organization has dozens of other classification groups as well, but now the next time you hear about an attack being attributed to “Scattered Spider” you know it’s the CrowdStrike name for a crime group.

Critical OpenWRT DHCP Flaw Fixed

The Hacker News reports on a major release of OpenWRT which includes fixes to the odhcpd server, the embedded DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 server written by OpenWRT.

The bug is a straight-forward stack style attack where a buffer is allocated, but not length-checked against the data required to reply to a malformed request. OpenWRT runs on a wide range of devices, but one of the most popular legacy platforms still in use, the MIPS processor architecture, lacks most modern security protections against stack-based attacks, making this attack sting more than it might on other architectures.

The latest OpenWRT releases also fix issues in the uhttpd embedded web server, multiple issues in the LUCI web configuration interface that allowed attackers to inject cross-site scripting content and Linux kernel security fixes. If you run a direct OpenWRT build on your equipment, update! These bugs will have an extremely long tail however, with tens of thousands, or likely more, OpenWRT-based devices that will never see updates.

The company behind several of the findings, Hacker House, say they used multiple AI tools and both open and frontier models to discover the bugs, then manual review and testing to confirm before reporting.

Cisco to Stop Assigning (some) CVEs

Cisco has announced it is moving to a twice-monthly patch cycle. Additionally, Cisco will no longer assign CVEs to each bug in the release.

Cisco says this is in reaction to the rapid increase in bugs found by AI tools, and that “Assessing security risk CVE-by-CVE and applying point mitigations is no longer fit for purpose.” Cisco will still assign a CVE to a bug that “requires compensating controls” or is known to be exploited.

It seems like it will be business as usual for the most severe bugs, but it will be interesting to see what happens when exploits are found for bugs which did not get a CVE in a prior release.

Microsoft Suggests Three-Day Patch Race

Microsoft is now recommending a 3 day patch window for new patches. This is, to say the least, an “aggressive” schedule for applying new patches, given the recent track record of issues introduced by patches.

A update that crashes is inconvenient on a home computer — even more so if it’s your parent’s computer — but could be catastrophic when it brings down an entire corporate fleet. Most large organizations have their own internal patch schedules and internal testing requirements before patches are deployed, delaying the patch process further.

Systems like the CISA KEV database, a list of vulnerabilities known to be actively exploited, are in place to help identify the most important issues. With repeated record-breaking numbers of vulnerabilities pushed in Patch Tuesday and the decreasing support of the KEV and related vulnerability indexing systems, the load on IT departments and administrators is becoming impossible.

The AI “bugpocalypse” is finding record numbers of vulnerabilities, while also closing the timeline between bug to exploit to hours in some cases. The time between bug and exploit then drives the patch cycle, which means less testing. With less testing, the patches are less stable, leading to less trust in rapidly installing them.

Oracle Patches Almost 1500 CVEs

Moving directly from the impacts of the flood of Microsoft security issues, the July 2026 patch set from Oracle included fixes for 1499 security issues and 1434 CVEs over 334 Oracle products.

Oracle is also pressuring administrators to move to a monthly patch cycle, but acknowledges “transitioning to a monthly security patching cadence may require updates to existing operational processes”. Not to worry – there is a Oracle consulting service you can hire to help you patch your Oracle problems.

Linux Patches 323 CVEs in Two Days

After announcing over 400 CVEs in the Linux kernel last week, Linux mainters have announced an additional 323 in the last three days alone. The vulnerabilities cover Bluetooth, Ethernet, USB gadget mode, WiFi drivers, virtualization systems, SMB file sharing, and of course more.

One benefit to the architecture of the Linux kernel is that typically all the fixes will arrive in a single kernel update, but when almost every week brings critical updates and a new kernel, patch fatigue is a real thing. Either users stop applying every update, or the uptime and testing requirements of a company prohibits constantly updating and changing servers.

Duress Passwords Aren’t Necessarily a Good Thing

The security-hardened Android variant Graphene, is in the news this week for the use of duress passwords.

A duress password is a mechanism where a second PIN or password can be used to initiate a device wipe. The hope is that in a situation where you are compelled to unlock a device, providing a password which then wipes the device is a preferable option.

The legality of a duress password depends on the environment it is used in. The United States Customs and Border Patrol claims that by wiping a device during an inspection at the US border, Samuel Tunick destroyed evidence and property in violation of federal laws. The issue is compounded because the stop happened at a border, where many US laws against search, seizure, and the availability of a lawyer are suspended, even for US citizens.

The inclusion of duress passwords, and their cousin hidden encrypted volumes, can sound like a good idea, but can place users in serious danger when in situations with less strict rules of law. Having the ability to wipe data sounds great in isolation, but protestors, human rights workers, and other targeted groups have faced direct and physical threats under some regimes. Facing retaliation for wiping a device, or facing physical violence before providing an unlock code out of fear that it might wipe a device, can be a real risk for some.

FreeBSD Fixes a WireGuard Bug

FreeBSD has issued a security update pertaining to the WireGuard VPN implementation.

WireGuard is a modern VPN with excellent performance even on low-end systems, and which has implementations on basically every platform. The FreeBSD implementation, however, didn’t fully validate VPN packets, accepting packets without checking one of the cryptographic validation measures.

Attackers are able to inject data to a FreeBSD WireGuard implementation if they are able to guess some attributes of the connection, and able to fully modify the data in the VPN if they are able to intercept the packets.

The bug impacts any FreeBSD user of WireGuard. FreeBSD has released updated kernels.

Linux Fu: Upcycling An Old Router

June 23, 2026 by 28 Comments

You’re wandering through a thrift store and spot an old router for ten bucks. Worthless, right? But in this case, it was a Google OnHub, which, at the time, was pretty premium and still isn’t anything to sneeze at. Of course, Google abandoned it long ago, and it runs Chrome, so pass, right? Of course I didn’t. In fact, I bought two for less than $20. The question is always the same: what do you do with it?

OpenWrt will run on the device. That’s a good start, but merely replacing the firmware isn’t much of a project. The more interesting question is whether the hardware can still do something useful. I had a specific need: connect a wired workstation to a reasonably distant WiFi network without running cable and without suffering the usual double-NAT headaches that come from turning the router into yet another subnet. For this, the OnHub turned out to be nearly perfect.

The Hardware

The OnHub was Google’s first Wi-Fi router, built by TP-Link and ASUS in different versions. Mine was the TP-Link model, and one was missing a bit of plastic cowl trim. Under the hood, it has a Qualcomm IPQ8064 dual-core processor — a dual-core ARMv7 — multiple radios, gigabit Ethernet, and enough memory to run OpenWrt comfortably: 1 GB of RAM and 4 GB of flash. The processor also has two network offload processors, but it isn’t clear to me that the stock OpenWrt build uses them.

These devices were expensive when new, but now show up regularly at thrift stores and surplus sales. Installing OpenWrt was straightforward. You do need to remove a screw that covers the magic switch at the bottom, but that’s not a big problem. You can just peel the rubber foot back if you don’t want to remove it. However, the interesting part came afterward.

Continue reading “Linux Fu: Upcycling An Old Router” →

Revisiting Making Your Own Internet Router In 2026

June 1, 2026 by 61 Comments

After my recent misadventures setting up an OpenWrt installation on a scruffy e-waste-level x86 PC, quite a few people chimed in with feedback, criticism and friendly hostility regarding things like a presumed ‘x86 bias’. There were also some system-related things that simply didn’t seem to want to work, such as booting from an SD card with a USB adapter, which cut short a lot of the actual OpenWrt testing that I had intended. This made it mostly an enlightening look at what issues you can run into when ‘quickly’ throwing an OpenWrt router together with some junk parts these days.

In this second article I’ll try to address as many of these points as possible, as well as attempt to show off an actual working OpenWrt installation in action. In addition, since just using random junk x86 PC parts was the way to go back in the late 90s/early 2000s doesn’t mean that this is still the way in 2026, so I’ll be taking a look at alternatives that exist today. This includes everything from mini PCs, to ancient business PCs being sold for peanuts, as well as more dedicated (ARM-based) hardware solutions.

Continue reading “Revisiting Making Your Own Internet Router In 2026” →

How The Banana Pi BPI-R4 Pro Violates The First Rule Of OpenWRT Club

May 22, 2026 by 8 Comments

As fun as ARM and RISC-V single-board computers (SBCs) are, all too often getting the most out of the hardware requires the use of an unofficial firmware image. So too with the Banana Pi BPI-R4 Pro router SBC that has been out for a while, as OpenWRT support for it still very much unofficial. This is where [Interfacing Linux] goes on a bit of a rant while assembling one of these puppies into a sleek metal enclosure.

The first rule of OpenWRT Club is of course that you never run an unofficial image on any hardware that’s part of any network you care about. This is somewhat upsetting, as the testing shown in the video below reveals that performance is great when running it.

Currently OpenWRT support is painfully working its way through development, per the OpenWRT PR thread, so there’s hope that official support will appear at some point. As with all of such SBCs the question is always whether official support appears before the hardware has been rendered firmly obsolete. Until then the community Debian 13 image might actually be safer.

Continue reading “How The Banana Pi BPI-R4 Pro Violates The First Rule Of OpenWRT Club” →

Trying To Build Your Own Consumer-Grade Router In 2026

April 16, 2026 by 49 Comments

Although we have many types of networking equipment with many unique names, at their core they can usually be reduced to just a computer with some specific peripherals. This is especially the case for something like a router, a device found in just about any home these days. Certain consumer-grade routers may contain something special like a VDSL modem, but most of them just have a WAN Ethernet jack on one end and one or more LAN-facing Ethernet ports.

All further functionality is implemented in software, including any firewall, routing and DHCP features. What this means is that any old PC with at least two Ethernet ports or equivalent can be a router as long as you install the appropriate software.

In this article we’ll be taking a look at what consumer-level options there exist here today, ideally something so simple that the average home user could set it up with a bit of coaching.

Continue reading “Trying To Build Your Own Consumer-Grade Router In 2026” →

This Week In Security: Second Verse, Worse Than The First

March 27, 2026 by 16 Comments

Isn’t there some claim events come in threes? After the extremely rare leak of the iOS Coruna exploit chain recently, now we have details from Google on a second significant exploit in the wild, dubbed Darksword.

Like Coruna, Darksword appears to have followed the path of government security contractors, to different government actors, to crypto stealer. It appears to focus on exploits already fixed in modern iOS releases, with most affecting iOS 18 and all patched by iOS 26.3.

Going from almost no public examples of modern iOS exploits to two in as many weeks is wild, so if mobile device security is of interest, be sure to check out the Google write-up.

Another FBI Router Warning

The second too early to be retro – but too important to ignore – repeat security item is a second alert by the FBI cautioning about end-of-life consumer network hardware under active exploitation, with the FBI tracking almost 400,000 device infections so far.

Like the warning two weeks ago, the FBI calls out a handful of consumer routers – but this time they’re devices that may actually still be service in some of our homes (or our less cutting edge friends and family), calling out devices from Netgear, TP-Link, D-Link, and Zyxel:

  • Netgear DGN2200v4 and AC1900 R700
  • TP-Link Archer C20, TL-WR840N, TL-WR849N, and WR841N
  • D-Link DIR-818LW, 850L, and 860L
  • Zyxel EMG6726-B10A, VMG1312-B10D, VMG1312-T20B, VMG3925-B10A, VMG3925-B10C, VMG4825-B10A, VMG4927-B50A, VMG8825-T50K

While many of these devices are over ten years old, they still support modern networking – some of them even supporting 802.11ac (also called Wi-Fi 5).  Unfortunately, since support has been ended by the manufacturers, publicly disclosed vulnerabilities have not been patched (and now never will be, officially) Continue reading “This Week In Security: Second Verse, Worse Than The First” →

This Week In Security: Plenty Of Patches, Replacing Old Gear, And Phrack Calls For Papers

March 13, 2026 by 7 Comments

When Friday the Thirteenth and Patch Tuesday happen on the same week, we’re surely in for a good time.

Anyone who maintains any sort of Microsoft ecosystem knows by now to brace for impact come Patch Tuesday; March brings the usual batch of “interesting” issues, including:

  • Two high-risk Microsoft Office vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-26110 and CVE-2026-26113), both of which allow execution of arbitrary code with no user interaction other than opening a hostile file. Vulnerabilities like these are especially dangerous in environments where transferring Office documents is considered normal, such as (unsurprisingly) offices, but also for home users who may not be savvy enough to avoid opening hostile files. Arbitrary code execution allows the attacker to run essentially any commands the user would be able to run themselves, typically leveraging it to install remote access or keyboard logging malware.
  • Excel gets a different vulnerability, CVE-2026-26144, which allows leaking of data through a cross-site scripting vulnerability. Coupled with CoPilot Agent, this can be used to leak contents of spreadsheets, again with no direct user interaction.

On the server and container side, this month includes a fairly typical collection of patches for SQL Server, and vulnerabilities in the Microsoft-hosted device pricing and payment orchestrator services, which have been automatically patched by Microsoft. Continue reading “This Week In Security: Plenty Of Patches, Replacing Old Gear, And Phrack Calls For Papers” →