3D Printed Mail Is A Modern Solution To An Ancient Problem

PLA mail being tested against a sword

The human body and sharp objects don’t get along very well, especially when they are being wielded with ill-intent. Since antiquity there have been various forms of armor designed to protect the wearer, but thankfully these days random sword fights don’t often break out on the street. Still, [SCREEN TESTED] wanted to test the viability of 3D printed chain mail — if not for actual combat, at least for re-enactment purposes.

He uses tough PLA to crank out a bed worth of what looks like [ZeroAlligator]’s PipeLink Chainmail Fabric, which just so happens to be the trending result on Bambu’s MakerWorld currently. The video shows several types of mail on the printer, but the test dummy only gets the one H-type pattern, which is a pity — there’s a whole realm of tests waiting to be done on different mail patterns and filament types.

In any case, the mail holds up fairly well to puncture from scissors and screwdrivers — with a heavy sweater or proper gambeson (a quilted cloth underlayer commonly worn with armor) on underneath, it looks like it could actually protect you. To slashing blows, PLA holds up astoundingly well, barely marked even by slashes from an actual sword. As for projectiles, well, everyone knows that to an arrow, chain mail is made of holes, and this PLA-based armor is no different (as you can see at 8:30 in the video below).

If you want to be really safe when the world goes Mad Max, you’d probably want actual chain mail, perhaps from stainless steel. On the other hand, if someone tries to mug you on the way home from a con, cosplay armor might actually keep you safer than one might first suspect. It’s not great armor, but it’s a great result for homemade plastic armor.

Of course you’d still be better off with Stepahnie Kwolek’s great invention, Kevlar.

2 thoughts on “3D Printed Mail Is A Modern Solution To An Ancient Problem

  1. I am told that the UK police force have stab-proof and bullet-proof vests available, but each type is ineffective against the opposite type of attack, and they are too bulky to be worn together.

  2. The way the guy treats the sword, it’s likely pretty blunt. Also his slash technique is non-existent. You need to actually cut with the last couple of inches. Not hammer the target with the edge, CUT. Imagine cutting a ball hanging by a string with a knife. You’d move the knife to the string and then slide the edge along, increasing the time the string spends with the edge under pressure.

    Due to his poor technique, we have learned nothing.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.