Complete the Hack A Day survey, win a shirt

posted Jul 21st 2010 6:29am by
filed under: news

Take our reader survey. Do it. Do it right now.  Do you think we should run more articles on the dietary needs of Llamas? Here is your chance to let us know.  We got a lot of great feedback from [Jason]‘s post, and now we’re ready for more. We’ve put together 10 quick questions that will help us get a feeling for what you want. We will be choosing 5 participants at random to give free t-shirts (the basic logo one).

Update: While we wait for our survey slave to get the changes made, please just put something in the fields that are mandatory(questions 7-9). Even if you put “no opinion”, we’ll get good info from the rest of the survey.



77 Responses to Complete the Hack A Day survey, win a shirt

  • extermin8tor says:

    I think that its great that hackaday is taking opinions from readers. I think that the survey shouldnt have had the (*)starred questions compulsory, I have no idea about names of writers on the site and I think that it would have been better for people to vote top 10 hacks out of say 20 that were picked by the Hackaday staff.
    Thats all :)

  • Nemo says:

    The survey is slightly broken, you cannot specify something in “other” without choosing one of the checkboxes.

  • azog says:

    You should make questions 7, 8 and 9 optional:

    #7 – I’d be hard pressed, out of the thousands of posts that must be, to pick three. You should be happy I just come here as often as I do :)

    #8 – Unless it’s a name like Adam Savage, chances are I am not going to know someone’s name. Or would you rather me post something like “that guy who made the relay computer”, where there are at least three matching criteria for that?

    #9 – what if I have no suggestions for the site?

  • Ian says:

    Question 3 is unanswerable. See comment from Nemo.

    Question 8, likewise. (No way to say ‘Nobody’).

    Ian.

  • catzburg says:

    @azog,
    #7 just pick one (or 3)
    #8 so say I don’t know, or don’t care to pay attention
    #9 so say that… duh

  • Brennan says:

    I got most of the way through the survey until I realized questions 7-9 are mandatory. Seriously, HAD? You expect me to randomly think up my top 3 posts I have seen here, and remember what they were called? And I don’t care who writes the articles, I just read them. I certainly don’t know two people to write in for #8. Let me finish the survey without answering these questions because I don’t have anything to contribute for #7-8.

  • Sheldon says:

    Well, I had no problems with it, although I want to know where my “a few times a day” option is?! ;-)
    (luckily I simply track the RSS so get the post as it happens)

  • eric says:

    Questions 3 (Which of these items would you like to see HackADay add or expand upon?) and 4 (How often would you like HAD to post new articles to the site?) imply that we viewers must want MORE of HAD.

    Remember when MORE meant including an ipod holder made of Lego?
    I’d much rather have less if the articles were of higher quality.

  • Tom says:

    I want to see 1-2 posts a day, maximum.

  • To be honest, you guys do a great job at this site. It is one of the few sites I actually check back on every fifteen to ten mins to read and look for new articles.

    Love the site have been coming here all day for years and will continue to come view your articles and content.

  • zzzomb says:

    Doesnt confirm that anything was submitted, just bounces back to the main HAD page. I will lose sleep from the intense fear of not being eligable to cover my pasty white skin with a HAD tshirt.

  • Gottabethatguy says:

    Thanks for listening to your readers.

    There was no option for less content than we have now. I would like to see less and higher quality content with proper fact checking, than more fluff just tossed in to make my rss reader tell me I have new content.

  • Sam says:

    I think we should follow Gottabethatguy lead and just post our survey answers here. A public vote is better.

    I second the less content, more quality idea.

  • A long time fan says:

    Replied, pretty much told you to stay as you are, get an IRC channel and some more traditional hacks.

  • Myke says:

    This question requires an answer.
    3. Which of these items would you like to see HackADay add or expand upon?Which of these items would you like to see HackADay add or expand upon? Software Hacks
    Hacks for Beginners
    Life Hacks
    Round up Posts (i.e. top 25 iPad hacks)
    Tutorial Series (Beginner to Advanced)
    Other (please specify) “Advanced Hacks”

    THIS IS FUCKING STUPID

  • wtf says:

    thank you for caring. somehow I feel more a part of this site now and haven’t even contributed.

    thank you

  • Dan Fruzzetti says:

    I forgot to add one answer; i hope a moderator reads this post.

    I think you should tap http://www.jameco.com and ask if their long-time contributor Forrest Mims (engineer, hobbyist tinkerer) has anything to contribute.

  • Frollard says:

    I think its ridiculous the questions on there — they are all stacked. People complain there are too many articles already — so the question “how many would you like?” is ‘same as now’ ‘more than now’ ‘lots more than now’. If you want statistically viable data you must offer the WHOLE range. ‘lots less’ ‘little less’ ‘same’ ‘more’ ‘lots more’.

  • adam says:

    I second the IRC channel. That’d be a handy convenience.

  • Kuba says:

    This question requires an answer.
    1. How often do you visit HAD?

    but i use rss and don’t visit at all or visit everyday, depending on interest in comments
    can’t pick a valid answer

  • Haku says:

    Question 4 should have an option saying “1-5″ because I prefer quality over quantity, I keep coming back here for the quality/inspirational hacks rather than the quantity of them and would prefer 1 quality hack over “how to do xyz with an Android phone” or “how to blink an LED with an Arduino”.

    I will fill in the survey, but not in it’s current form, it needs tweaking.

  • TJ says:

    I guess I need to do an instructable on how to fill out the HaD survey and then hope it gets picked up by HaD…

  • fotoflojoe says:

    Bazinga.

    I know, that wasn’t helpful.
    HaD, keep up the great work!

  • Haku says:

    Meant to say “1 quality hack over 5 of ”

    Which leads onto another point; the ability to have up to one minute to edit your post would be handy, too.

  • icebrain says:

    @adam: Damn, I should have put that one too, IRC ftw.

  • Ivan says:

    … in any case, just five t-shirts are not enough!

  • w0lv3n says:

    Where is the option for viewing the site 10+ times day?

  • thlip says:

    yeah I wish I had thought of IRC as well. Like Caleb said they will look at the comments so no need to worry about missing it in the survey I suppose.

  • Gottabethatguy says:

    Caleb, I read everything that gets posted on this site, hence my frustration at times. I’ve read that letter, and responded to it.

    If you don’t want your readers opinions on how to make the site better why ask for them in the first place?

  • zypher says:

    Apparently they should survey us about how we like our surveys.

  • Ben Wright says:

    You should look into getting t-shirts screen printed shirts cheaper, if you can only splurge on 5 to promote your website. My dad gets shirts screen printed for <$4 each 2 color front and back printing. In this ecconomy if you can't find a supplier for under $5 a shirt, you didn't get off your computer/

  • svofski says:

    I’d answer “1-2 posts per day too”. But I don’t think every question will be understood literally. If the majority answers the minimum quantity in that question, HaD may take it as a hint. It appears that they’re under pressure from (…) to POST MOARRR, EXPAND, GROW.. etc, that kind of bullshit.. and have to invent ways to satisfy the (…) and not to piss off the old-time readers, all at the same time. Tough job.

  • osgeld says:

    @Gottabethatguy sounds like you need to learn a little self control, just cause there is a link on your screen you dont have to click it

  • ehrichweiss says:

    I don’t play the “and possibly win a shirt” game. My time is worth more than that.

  • itwork4me says:

    I am sure this is simply a scam for them to generate hits for affiliate sites. As stated above…you’re lucky I read your site. 5 shirts, come on! Not worth my time…And if you read this far, it wasn’t worth yours either.

    • Caleb Kraft says:

      @itwork4me,
      Nope, not a scam. We thought you guys would like the ability to participate in our growing process. As svofski pointed out, the balance is tough. the free shirts were just a bonus. We don’t share those email addresses with anyone else. Besides, you entered your email address in wordpress to make that comment. If we really needed to sell them, I think we could do better than an un-required field on our survey.

  • Sam says:

    @Cabel Just because HAD says that it’s not going to lower the quality of articles doesn’t mean they’re going to actually follow through. I would like the quality to increase. HAD will do what they have to for their site to be popular.

  • Vonskippy says:

    I was surprised there was no question asking how many articles by drooling Apple Fanboys bashing the Android do we want.

  • thlip says:

    @ehrichweiss,
    My time is worth more than a shirt too. But I would have done the survey if no shirt was given out. I love this site as do most people who post comments here. I think most people would think having input would be worth their time, at least if they enjoyed the content. The shirt to me really is a bonus on top of that.

  • oef.soldier.medic says:

    well I must admit that even here, deployed in the afghani desert, I find myself checking HAD whenever I can….then I make some calls home. :)

  • Jukus says:

    Had is great, and having more comunity interaction will only be a good thing. I also think a more detailed census on your users will help you tailor your topics, ads and maybe even highlight some new editing talent.

    Another idea is user sponsored projects where projects are agreed, a ringer is brought in and shares out the workload across the comunity and maybe even costs too. This site is perfect for atracting very driven and innovative people, if had can coordinate some colaberations it could provide content, community interaction, experience for those involved and maybe even some world class open source products

  • Ryan says:

    Is the link broken?? Even if I’m too late and they’re out of shirts, I still want to post… :(

  • Blind says:

    Since people are posting what they said in the survey, the main part:

    Hack A Day used to turn down submitted links to projects because another site already linked to it. Those days, they wanted to be a site that had original (-ish) content that you didn’t just find anywhere else. Whether or not this made sense from a marketing point of view or not, it was nice from a readers point of view. I could browse HaD and not feel like I am still reading the RSS feed for Make or any other similar sites. there might be some duplication, but for the most part, it was kept to a minimum.

    Move forward a few years and HaD starts posting articles it itself had posted only a year prior. If the site doesn’t care enough to do a 2 second check in it’s database, why should I care enough to come here and read it?

    Stop posting 10 articles a day about any random bullshit you are typing about; i can find that anywhere online. Go back to quality projects. Go back to one post a day (with a second of minor links compiled). We all know where engadget and make and gizmodo and this old house and whatever else can be found, stop trying to be those other sites.

  • Blind says:

    god… my writing is just awful there…

  • dick twitch says:

    i agree with the HAD readers above adam Z

    1) feedback to confirm receipt of my submited questionaire would have been nice

    2) forest mims would make an excellent contributor if you could convice him

    3) another electronics/hacking/project design god that i would like to see contribute is albert ricci bitti ( http://www.riccibitti.com )
    , again if you could convince him ?

  • Steve says:

    I filled out the survey, but honestly I don’t know why. This site has demonstrated time and time again that they only care about what we have to say if it’s profitable. Just look above one of your readers (nore then one actualy) said he would like less quantity and more quality and you reply with a flat ‘NO; please see already posted reasons why’ I’ll tell you why because less content means less advertising revenue. Infact if you read the coments on this site (and I know you do Caleb) I’m sure you can see that
    the general sentiment has been against more content since you started posting more content. Why bother asking if you don’t care to hear what we have to say? I and others, most of whom have been around here quite a bit longer then you, have been telling you what we want all along, you obviously heard because you structured the survey in a way that was biased. Now I’m not trying to be a hater, infact I’ve been reading this site since Eliot started it years ago, I even bought my bus pirate from seeedstudio to support this site even though the shipping takes forever and I could have ordered it from sparkfun and had it in a few days. This site is a pale ghost of what it used to be, I only check back because every once in a while you’ll post something good. And to everyone saying our time is worth more then a tshirt; of course it is. The time we waste here is worth far more to Caleb and hackaday then it is to us, because that’s how they get paid. Think about that as you flat out tell your readers your not interested in there input, without us you’d be out of a job.

    • Caleb Kraft says:

      I’m going in backwards order I guess.
      @Steve and Gottabethatguy,
      It was not my intention to give a “slap in the face”. I was pointing to where the boss (Jason) said we are growing. The reason he posted that was to point out that hackaday needs to make more money, so an expansion is in order. I felt that reading it from the boss’s mouth was a much better solution than me replying with a less eloquently written paraphrasing.

      I really don’t worry about my job security here. I have a day job for that. I do this because I love this site. I want to see it survive this “expansion”. I’m really trying to be a liaison between the business side and the readers. I’m not completely sure how best to do that, but I’m still going to try.

  • Gottabethatguy says:

    Thanks Steve, you put that more eloquently than I could have. Caleb’s comment was like a slap in the face, when all I was doing was offering my honest opinion.

  • Blind says:

    Caleb, he says nothing in the letter about not reducing the number of posts per day. He says nothing that conflicts at all with the request of “post less and post better”.

    If you aren’t going to read his letter, don’t be an ass when you are responding to other people and claim that he already addressed the point.

    Frankly, all of what has been happening lately (this survey, the letter, the copyright issue on user videos at youtube) is getting to a bit of a critical mass. Yeah, it’s a business, I get that. And yeah, one reader doesn’t really matter in the grand scheme. I’m just about decided to walk away from this site that I’ve been following for years though. I’ll find the projects elsewhere ultimately and if I miss out on condescending owners I’m sure I’ll find a way to deal.

    • Caleb Kraft says:

      @blind,
      I didn’t say anything condescending. This is a common issue with online communication. Tone isn’t conveyed well, especially when you try to avoid stating opinions. Jason posted that this is a business that needs to grow. I’m trying to strike a balance between that growth and keeping people happy. I was linking to Jason’s letter to show why we won’t be reducing the amount of content on the site based on quotes like this:

      I’d like to see Hackaday grow and expand its mission beyond “one hardware hack a day.”

  • Spork says:

    I agree with the “should have been several times a day option” comment.

    I think you’ll get a lot of good info from this survey, and why are you guys having such a hard time finding your favourite three articles? Just pick three that you really like. I had about 20 come to mind and just chose three of them.

    Caleb, I think you’re doing a great job, keep up the good work!

  • thlip says:

    Seems to me the best way to produce more content and keep the quality and originality that Steve’s talking about is to produce more in house projects. But is that even possible with the current staff? I mean Jukus’s idea was good but is it possible to get the community to work together like that? Something like irc or a dedicated forum would be needed.

    BTW Steve your comment just about brought a tear to my eye.

  • Charles says:

    There is a very important fact that most of the people leaving comments here are missing.

    HAD is in the RED. Jason stated in his post that he is losing $$$ every month on HAD. At the time of this comment, HAD has a 12,192 Alexa world ranking. This means out of every site on the web, HAD is the 12,192 most popular site in the world. HAD averages between 2 and 3.5 million unique visits a month. I am betting the reason “several times a day” was not an option is simply because as far as traffic stats are concerned, your 30 visits a day only equals 1 unique visit in the stats.

    HAD sees about 4 million page views a month, that is a hell of a lot of bandwidth. HAD is most likely on a dedicated server with no bandwidth cap. Those servers are not cheap. Jason could be losing a few hundred to over $1000 a month since HAD is not self sustaining.

    With a 12k Alexa rank it should not be that hard to pull down enough advertising to cover the server cost, but what about writers pay? For a site to continue to grow in popularity and compete with its competitors, it must also grow and expand its audience.

    Hacking, Making, DIY is not the same as it was when HAM radios were the bleeding edge of hobbyist level electronics. It is understandably hard for old-timers to accept the changes, but with more and more youth entering the DIY market HAD must tailor some content to them also. This means more entry level articles based around platforms the youth are familiar with such as Arduino.

    Demographic Stats from Alexa show that HAD’s main reader base is in the 18-24 age bracket. With 25-34 making up the next minority.

    Ultimately it all boils down to this. HAD is owned by Jason, Staffed by Mike and Caleb and the other fine writers. The decision as to what HAD covers and how they expand is up to them. They might lose a few readers but in the end they will surely gain more than they will lose. This happens to every site and it is not a bad thing. Half of the negative comments in this post are from the same people who bash HAD in every post and threaten to leave in every comment they make. With 4 million unique visits a month I am sure HAD wont miss those haters or feel the tiny tiny tiny dent left from their absence.

    For the record all of my stats are taken from Alexa.com and HAD’s Sitemeter page.

  • luke says:

    Like many have already said: Jason stated in his post that he is losing $$$ every month on HAD.

    With community projects like Jukus talks about, you can kill two birds..once a talent pool is established and the member skill-sets are understood. Had could make some money by acting as a recruitment delegate for commercial R&D, reverse engineering and consultancy services.

  • matt says:

    I filled out my survey with the information I feel is important to the owner(s), but I just have a few comments/questions:

    Alexa is notorious for underreporting technical sites, because a large part of the readership is savvy enough to block ads and tracking cookies. If Alexa says HAD is 12,000, that’s pretty awesome since they’re probably significantly higher. Notice that even Alexa says they’re 6,289 in the US, which is an awesome number. And yes, that means there’s high hosting costs, but seriously, places like dreamhost give unlimited monthly bandwidth, no fine print, at quite affordable rates. I imagine that a dedicated colo server can’t be that expensive.

    So I guess I ask, why does HAD need to grow/expand? Sure, try to cover the costs, that one’s pretty obvious. But do you really need more articles for that? Don’t become lifehacker. And once you’re in the black, how many writers do you ACTUALLY need? Sure, let the owner pocket some for setting up/running this (it can’t be a full time job), and throw a reasonable salary at some telecommuting writer to write up the descriptions and sort through submissions. Hell, if you guys pulled $100,000 a year in, you could pay two good writers $40k each, pay $1000/mo (too high) for dedicated hosting, and still have another $8k to pocket. You’ve got 2 million uniques a month. Let’s say you got 2 million visitors a year: pulling an equivalent value of 5 cents per person would pay for everything I outlined earlier. Or pulling $5 out of 1% of your readers in a month. Maybe I’m missing something, but it seems like between ads and merch, and maybe shrinking your hosting costs, there’s no reason you can’t pull that off. Unless you’re using tens of terabytes a month, which part of me doubts, and if you are, you should really figure out how to save every last bit!

  • blue carbuncle says:

    Virtual Bread Board. Supports Arduino
    http://www.virtualbreadboard.net/

    Otoy Cloud computing. Run Crysis on your iPhone
    http://otoy.com/#/home/

    Programming your car’s key fob to work with another car
    http://filear.com/index.php/other/48-other/64-programming-a-replacement-keyless-entry-remote

    best of luck HAD

  • Blind says:

    Caleb, it was condescending. That you think it wasn’t doesn’t change that it was. The person you said it to even said it felt like a slap in the face.

    And quotes like this:

    I’d like to see Hackaday grow and expand its mission beyond “one hardware hack a day.”

    do not mean that fewer posts are not an option.

    • Caleb Kraft says:

      @Blind,
      Ok, I guess that can’t be argued. Sorry to all that felt condescended to. It was definitely not my intention.

      Just to clarify things. I’ve spoken with Jason about this several times and, if it isn’t completely clear from his post, let me just state: fewer posts are not an option. Hackaday will expand and grow. Hopefully we can do it based on the feedback of our readers.

      We’re currently working on ways to compromise (better filtering, classic section!, etc), but we won’t be slowing down.

  • imsolidstate says:

    Thanks to Caleb for being the mediator and asking for our input.

    One thing I don’t get is if HAD is actually in the RED, why did they just hire three new writers? Usually people get laid off when things aren’t going well. I think matt brought up some good points. HAD doesn’t need to be super popular or make tons of money. The people that like the real content of this site are a small percentage of the population, hence the small numbers. I don’t see that as a problem, simply a reality.
    I for one would be willing to pay a small fee or buy merchandise or something to keep HAD pure. I like coming here BECAUSE I don’t have to sort through stuff I’m not interested in. I’m tired of the “learn a little self control, just cause there is a link on your screen you dont have to click it” school of thought. The whole reason websites exist is to group content for a particular audience. Diluting HAD with lots of low level content will really diminish the value of the stuff I come here to see. For example, how much of the CORE audience ever goes to instructables? I never do, because I don’t really learn much. There might be some good stuff there, but I’ll never find it because I’m not going to search through everything else. In fact, that’s why I started my website in the first place. I was tired of not finding much on the web, so I started posting my own projects. I found HAD when they linked to one of my projects.

    It’s obvious from Jason’s letter that the direction of this site is for more content, not less. I respect that since Jason is the owner; he is free to do as he sees fit. I guess I’ll probably go back to reading engineering publications like design news and electronics design, it’s just too bad that they are so boring compared to HAD.

    I’m sure not seeing much of this overwhelming “I’d like to see Hackaday grow and expand its mission beyond “one hardware hack a day.”” on this thread.

  • osgeld says:

    “”I’m tired of the “learn a little self control, just cause there is a link on your screen you dont have to click it” school of thought.”"

    I get tired of the ‘i visit a free website and expect them to custom make content that I approve of’

    “The whole reason websites exist is to group content for a particular audience.”

    Really?

    “For example, how much of the CORE audience ever goes to instructables? I never do, because I don’t really learn much. There might be some good stuff there, but I’ll never find it because I’m not going to search through everything else.”

    must be nice to expect total strangers to serve you custom tailored content to your tastes of the day, god help YOU find something that interest you

    “I was tired of not finding much on the web, so I started posting my own projects.”

    you just stated your not going to search, how do you find anything if your not looking?

    boo hoo, IMO HAD should go like instructables, load it with ad’s make a login, charge for premium services, then the only people left will be the ones who want to be here, not a bunch of people acting overly entitled on a free blog

  • Whatnot says:

    IRC might seem nice but in practice you usually don’t get much actual help on IRC, people are either AFK or feel trying to help people as too much pressure or get annoyed if they are asked to help because it exposes that there is stuff they don’t know and that hurts their self-image.

    It’s not impossible, but it’ll look better on paper than when it’s there in all probability.
    But I don’t mind being proven wrong though.

  • thlip says:

    I can understand the crunch that Caleb and Jason are in. I think the main point is if going forward there is more content going into the site that it’s good quality and original. I think a lot of the complaining that goes on, on the site is sometimes the lack of originality in some of the posts. I did read Jason’s letter and know that these are being put on the backburner, but posts like the top 5 twitter clients is one that comes to mind. It might be a well written article and facts aside is it really a hack? I think most people would agree that it wasn’t. But you can look at some of the other content that HAD staff are trying to come up with and I’m happy with such as android tutorial. It’s not a hardware hack really but I think it is more suited for the site.

    Adding in more articles per day doesn’t mean that they have to be lacking in quality, but I think it requires more thinking. I think Jason is right the site if it goes forward in this direction needs to come up with a distinct mission statement and establish what that is so that we as readers know what kind of content to expect and set that as a guideline and people can stop complaining.

    This seems to be more what you need to be asking Caleb. What do you think the mission statement should be for the site? I think it should be “To create a culture of building quality novel Hardware/Software projects and designs” Then stipulate what falls into this category. We could have users working together in a group setting like IRC or a web forum(answers.hackaday.com is a start), and more writers working on projects and maybe facilitating new projects by users.

    Maybe I’m out of line, but I think if done right this could be a good growth as long as the quality doesn’t slip. Some look at some of the articles and think it is slipping or has. I’m sure that’s what more of the worring is about. I look at all the above posts and they ask for less articles not because they want less content but because they want more quality content. If you could convince them that there would be more quality insightful articles that are directly related to hacking some hardware or hacking some software to do something then I think they would be on board. I don’t think the current users want to see non technical stuff on here, and see things like the twitter review as a move towards that. Yes it was addressed but people see the move forward and see similar things. It doesn’t have to be, tutorials for beginners is still relevant and doesn’t have to be overly amateurish.

    Wow that was a long ramble.

  • imsolidstate says:

    osgeld: your contributions to this website are so meaningful and constructive! What would HAD be like without you?
    Unlike you I actually create content. I don’t NEED to FIND anything at all. I make it.

    “must be nice to expect total strangers to serve you custom tailored content to your tastes of the day, god help YOU find something that interest you”

    You forget that those total strangers chose my content to serve. I have had three of my projects
    posted on HAD.

    • Caleb Kraft says:

      Everyone stop arguing with eachother please.

      We value everyone’s opinion. Whether you’ve had 3 posts about you like [imsolidstate] , 6 like [Osgeld], or none. Please keep your comments on topic. No personal attacks at each other are necessary. Lets talk about what you would like to see on the site.

      So far we’ve got, fewer posts with higher quality content.

      what else? What tutorials would you like to see?

  • Osgeld says:

    “So far we’ve got, fewer posts with higher quality content.”

    I think you need to know the expectations of what quality content means

    does that mean well documented with instructions, does that mean the objects of the article are of the highest quality, on and on and on

    people making loose cloud demands should speak up and define quality to them, otherwise you will never satisfy them

  • Drone says:

    *3. Which of these items would you like to see HackADay add or expand upon?

    Option: “Life Hacks”

    Need I say more? Bad HaD…

  • jukus says:

    I would love to see something done with the sheeva, maybe adding a serial port for an x10 module?

  • edonovan says:

    I went back through the past few weeks of posts before replying here…

    Site content seems fine to me. Personally, I could care less about photography hacks and android programming; but I can appreciate there are a number of people who are interested in those things.

    It would be nice to have more generalized categories, maybe even branched. Creations, Bending, Software, Life, etc. Obviously, some posts can belong to more than one category.

    But if you can define 4 or 5 categories, you could direct posts to each category per day. This could keep everyone happy (except the trolls, obviously).

  • imsolidstate says:

    @Caleb:
    Sorry. I thought your tutorials were a good idea. Everybody is interested in different things though so it will be tough. I personally wasn’t interested in the DTG tut because I have a screenprinting setup. Probably a lot of people would be interested in CNC or PCB tutorials.
    How about something like building a setup for bending acrylic? Maybe repurposing a plastic bag sealer or something.
    Personally I think it would be cool to see stuff like a tutorial for building galvanometers on the cheap for a laser projector, (I tried that, it’s hard) or how about a tutorial for building an OBDII interface and the required software. Does that help?

  • Gottabethatguy says:

    How about user competitions, where a clear and concise goal is set, define a price point maybe for what you are allowed to spend on the construction or maybe have multiple categories of judging. Maybe one month the challenge could be put out to design a method of finding coins on a beech, or who can create a portable beer cooler that doesn’t require ice or have to be plugged in. Create a points system maybe where HaD chooses its favorites, then let the crowd choose their favorites and hand out prizes.

    This would encourage original site content, increase user submissions, and it might actually get a few more people actually making stuff. Maybe the winner each month (or however often the contest is ran) could get a guest spot on HaD and have their project highlighted and work with the writers at HaD to create a tutorial on how the project was made.

    The contest could be anything from hardware hacks, to photography challenges, or software challenges. Perhaps put up a encrypted message and see who can decipher it. I think if the site got more of its users actively involved in creating things we could generate the content required to feed HaD current hunger for more content.

    More content isn’t a bad thing by itself, its only a bad thing when quality is sacrificed. By poor quality I mean specifically, posts that don’t fit the meme of the site. Posts that have not had the proper and required research done to create an intelligent article. Saying that no schematics are provided when they are and the author just failed to click through the links on the site they are linking to is a perfect example of this. We don’t need posts showing us how to set up firefox. We don’t need posts telling us about the coolest new chat client. We don’t need posts showing us how to hook a D cell to a couple dinky cars to act as a switch.

    We are supposed to be a community of hackers and makers. Not a community of invalids who need to be spoonfed and hand held at every turn. I beg you to not dumb down the content. The tutorials are great, intro articles to complex subjects are great. Everyone needs to start somewhere right. But for those who need help setting up an rss feed, let them go elsewhere. This is frigging HaD, I consider this site to be an elite site among a sea full of mediocrity. Please please please don’t become another life hacker.

  • kernelcode says:

    @Gottabethatguy
    I like that idea a lot! The ‘make a business card sized project’ comp brought out some pretty good stuff as far as i can remember, and it would certainly be a good way to get some content!
    +1 on the competition/challenge idea.

    I guess the Hackit articles are sort of a stab at that, but I think something more specific would be better. Seems like a tall order to pluck these ideas out the air, but give it a shot if you can!
    Maybe like the hackthissite.org software challenges, but more hardware oriented

  • JMLB says:

    I like the challenge idea. I also like that people could work with the writers to make a good tutorial and all the documentation would be available. I would participate :P I never have project Ideas. Even the chance to be on HaD would be motivation enough imo.

  • Squirrel says:

    I’m starting a movement right now that to help HaD stay afloat, we should all turn off our ad blockers on hackaday.com (after all, TANSTAAFL)

    Who’s in?

  • mehville rite says:

    Let’s have HAD define “hack” so we all know what to expect. I’ve seen more articles lately that I can’t see where “hack” is appropriate. I’m getting close to going to only “once a week HAD” or “don’t even bother anymore with HAD” if the trend continues.

  • Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Hack a Day serves up fresh hacks each day, every day from around the web as well as hacking related news.

    Send us your hacks






         




    Hacks

    Resources