Hackaday Links: March 20, 2011

SNES Arcade Cabinet

arcade_cabinet

[Daniel] let us know that he finished up a SNES arcade cabinet he has been working on for awhile. It looks so good, he says that his wife has even agreed to let him keep it in the house!

DIY Overhead projector beamer

diy_beamer

[Liquider] sent us some information about a DIY beamer he built using an overhead projector and an old LCD panel. It looks like a great way to get a big-screen wall display set up in no time.

WordClock gets a makeover

wordclock

[Doug] wrote in to share with us some progress he has made on his WordClock. You might remember our coverage of this creative timepiece a little while back. This time around, he has built a new control board, and is using vinyl stencils for a much cleaner look.

Interactive water fountain

interactive_fountain

[Gerry Chu] is well known for his water-based imagery and projects. His most recent project is a water fountain that interacts with passers by. There are no real build details as of yet, but we hope to see some soon.

Sixty Symbols explains why glass is transparent

glass

Do you think you know why glass is transparent, but a brick is not? If you looked it up via Google, you are likely mistaken. A professor from the University of Nottingham explains why the Internet is so, so wrong about this, as well as how energy gap determines if photons of light can make it through a piece of glass. [via i09]

Comments

  1. roy says:

    first lol but i liked the links

  2. pod says:

    missing link for the overhead projector beamer :/

  3. Mike Nathan says:

    @pod, fixed. Thanks for the heads up.

  4. Martin says:

    now the beamer link goes to “Making Kinect Work With PS3″ ….?

  5. Munch says:

    @Mike, wrong link to the beamer, and the site is impossible to navigate. :(

  6. Mike Nathan says:

    Fixed for real this time.

  7. strider_mt2k says:

    Love the arcade hack.
    I seem to recall the joystick part being featured a while back. Cool to see more of the build!

  8. Regarding the University of Nottingham video: as far as completely explaining why glass is transparent, it leaves a little to be desired. One might envision from the explanation that any photon with more energy (shorter wavelength) than the visible spectrum will pass through glass and any photon with less energy (longer wavelength) would be blocked. But radio waves can pass through glass (and I also believe UV is partially blocked). Why is this?

    Well, it is not just about exciting electrons to a higher energy state. There are other ways to impart energy to an atom, e.g., vibrating it, rotating it, ionizing it, etc. For glass, visible light happens to fall in between the light which causes vibration (IR) and the light which causes excitation (UV), and since visible photons are too energetic to cause rotations, but not energetic enough to cause excitations (as described in the video) they fail to be absorbed.

  9. Phil says:

    Ha, I had to do a double take there. Professor Moriarty was one of my lecturers at Nottingham.

  10. dmo says:

    Regarding the University of Nottingham video: I agree with Insipid M. The explanation regarding the photon energy is a little too simplistic. Isn’t there a lot more to it? (adsorption, reflection, refraction, re-emission, multiple energy level changes, etc.)

    I think an additional explanation about why light gets dimmer as the thickness of the material increases is also warranted. Leaving that out implies thickness wouldn’t matter.

  11. dmo says:

    adsorption -> absorption

  12. Leithoa says:

    Sure the vid leaves something to be desired if you’re getting you’re degree in materials engineering or physics, but it was recorded with a target audience for you’re average Joey Bloggs walking down the street.

  13. Joe says:

    Having physics degree in optics, I too agree that the light video is over simplified. We just jumped to quantum wave equations and did not play around in the electron ball pit. Throw in a few more integrals, some vector calculus, and Maxwell, and then we’ll be on our way.

    For example, Germanium lenses are transparent in the infrared, but not in the visible. Hum… the visible has higher energy photons than the IR. Shouldn’t they be transparent Doc?

  14. bob says:

    @Joe: Isnt that exactly what the video explained? Infra-red has low energy, so it cant put the ball on the shelf, so continues on its way to the other end of the room.

    I quite liked the video as I had always wondered why glass is transparent. I know its a simplification, but now knowing that it’s to do with energy levels, and knowing stuff about energy levels, i can infer a lot of other things.

  15. phnx says:

    Interactive Fountain – *gerry* chu

  16. S says:

    A few months ago Jeri Ellsworth explained the bandgap, how affects light and why you should give your girlfriend a cubic zirconia instead of a diamond.

    Making an OLED – Light from Carbon Compounds – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAgRF8TibJ0

  17. Tachikoma says:

    All the youtube channels from Nottingham is quality, especially periodicvideos. Wish more of the internet was like that.

  18. Brian.Holiday says:

    There is a problem with the beamer, the heat from the bulb in the projector will burn the LCD causing a ‘bad spot’. I fixed the problem on mine by raising it up a little and ducting airflow from a little fan.

  19. BillyBob says:

    @Brian.Holiday did you even read the article? “After installing all the driverboard and powersource i had to build a cooling system in order to prevent the screen from getting damaged through the OH’s lightsource.

    Cool air gets sucked in at the front and flows under the screen right through the driver board.”

  20. guffguff says:

    @dmo: Surely the reason for glass becoming more and more opaque with thickness is just due to impurities. The light may go through glass, but if there are a few atoms of some element in it, it will cause a slight amount of light reflection. For a piece of glass a few millimetres thick you’d never notice, but as it gets thicker, the chance of meeting an impurity increases and it gets more and more opaque.

    Maybe…

  21. Brian.Holiday says:

    @BillyBob You got me, I missed it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 91,443 other followers