If you live in a city with poor air quality you may be aware that particulates are one of the chief contributors to the problem. Tiny particles of soot from combustion, less than 10μm across, hence commonly referred to as PM10. These are hazardous because they can accumulate deep in the lungs, wherein all kinds of nasties can be caused.
There are commercial sensors available to detect and quantify these particles, but they are neither inexpensive nor open source. [Rundong] tells us about a project that aims to change that situation, the MyPart, which is described as a portable, accurate, low-cost, open source air particle counter. There is a GitHub repository for the project as well as a series of Instructables covering the build in detail. It comes from a team of members of the Hybrid Ecologies Lab at UC Berkeley, USA.
Along the way, they provide a fascinating description of how a particulate sensor works. A laser shines at right angles across a photodiode, and is brought to a focal point above it. Any particulates in the air will scatter light in the direction of the photodiode, which can thus detect them. The design of a successful such sensor requires a completely light-proof chamber carefully built to ensure a laminar flow of air past laser and diode. To that end, their chamber has several layers and is machined rather than 3D-printed for internal smoothness.
We’ve covered quite a few environmental sensors over the years here at Hackaday. An open source volatile organic compound (VOC) detector featured last year for example, or this Raspberry Pi-based system using a commercial gas sensor.
PM10 is a chinese invention. The creator of this device will be arrested and sent back to North Korea.
They use PM2.5. here in the mean time. Seems to be more suited for the greenis to bugger car owners. You can get higher numbers with much less mass, so they are more impressive.
Braaaaaaiinzzz!
PM2.5 gets deeper into your lungs and stays in the air longer than PM10. Hence why it actually matters.
This is great!
Even know it is a nice build and an interesting project: I don’t like it. Here this will just lead to even more charges for people that don’t have the cash for a fancy new car.
And people that do have sufficient cash will just not buy an economic reasonable car and get away with it anyway.
Or like my neighbour once said ‘there’s so much bad air, it’s horrible’… right before she started her new G-class benz. \o/
we cant keep living by the lowest common denominator.
it’s early, I haven’t finished my coffee yet but, at first, I read this as an Air Particle Printer. I read into it thinking that air borne particles were picked up and then somehow fused to a page. I’m fairly certain this process would take forever but it’s certainly novel. I suppose a particulate counter is good too.
One could maybe somehow achieve that using electrostatics… take a while unless it’s a real dusty environment.
That sounds like the next level of air-quality. “It is not just bad for you, you can actually use it to print.” Can someone calculate what kind of PM2.5 (or PM10) levels are needed for a printer?