Our thoughts on the iPad

posted Jan 29th 2010 3:00pm by
filed under: macs hacks, news

The iPad, announced earlier this week,  has been a massive media extravaganza. Some people were elated, and some let down. We’ve been asked over and over what our thoughts on the device are. Join us after the break to find out.

[Caleb]–My grandma would love this. I really think that she is their target. It is easy to use, portable, and has a custom interface that removes all of the windows style interface cruft. Personally, I don’t need one. I have an iPhone (yes, I know most of you hate them). The iPad offers me nothing that my iPhone doesn’t, except a larger screen.

I am excited though. I’m excited at the prospect of a mid level touch screen tablet with an appliance style interface becoming common. I can’t wait to see the knockoffs that can run Linux with a custom interface. The knockoffs that will actually have USB ports, and a non wobbly back. Those same knockoffs that will most likely have a front facing camera. I want one of those.

As far as hackability goes, this might actually be fairly hackable. The processor isn’t actually as proprietary as some would think. It is ARM based, and not too different from some other devices we’ve seen. It appears as though they planned for a camera. There might even be a spot on the motherboard for it. I fully expect to see it “jailbroken”, but what I WANT to see is the guts modified. I want to see home hackers add external storage (card slot), load a different operating system, up the storage. Then again, I thought the same thing about the iPhones and iPod touches, but haven’t seen hardware hacks at all really.

[Mike]–This is the first I’ve heard of the iPad. I got soooooo tired of all the apple tablet rumors that I quit paying attention. I run Linux only and unless this device will sync out of the box with my Linux systems I’m not interested. I also don’t usually do hardware hacks on anything that cost me more than $250 but buy so I’m not going to be cracking the case open on this thing anytime soon.

[James] — The iPad has the opportunity to be a great product, but probably not for me, and probably not for most of our readers. It markets itself to the casual internet user who wants to listen to music, browse Facebook, or watch Youtube on the couch rather than the hardcore photo editor, writer, or programmer. I am excited to see someone like Apple really push the market, and cant wait to see the responses, especially from people like MSI and Asus. Personally, I’m waiting for someone to make a really great convertible tablet netbook with native support for Linux.

[Jakob] — I hate Apple products, I mean almost with a passion. But I actually do own an iPhone – and I admit, it is one slick nice device. Small, powerful, convenient – all things the iPad is not. Its like Apple couldnt decide on making yet another iPhone revision or a full tablet PC and decided to give us a semi nerfed iPad instead. From what I’ve heard, there is no multitasking and several other features that – if can be included on the iPhone – why did they remove it from the iPad? Final note: being an apple product, its  about $500 more then it should be.

(And it doesn’t even come with wings for extra absorption)

[Devlin] — Meh, I don’t think there is going to be much to do with hacking the iPad, I won’t buy one because I don’t see a reason for having it. If others have the same thought, not many people are going to be buying the iPad and therefore not many people are going to be hacking the iPad.



161 Responses to Our thoughts on the iPad

  • Odin84gk says:

    iPad is to netbooks what the iPod was to mp3 players. If they make it pretty enough and easy enough to use, it will succeed.

    On a side note, it can act like a phone with a bluetooth headset and a VOIP application.

  • osgeld says:

    Jeez hack a day, keep on the ball much?

    anyway, its a nifty toy with no market, designed for dumbness who get confused pushing the time in on their microwave

    what else can you say, other than the normal apple stuff of “it looks pretty” and “i better sell the car if i want one”

  • Tim says:

    This is a lame product simply because it’s really behind the curve already. Really, it’s almost like the iPad is knockoff. Look for web tablets that already run android and have been on the market for awhile. You can get them with screens from 3.5″ up to 12″, and nearly all of them are cheaper, have more features(multitasking), and are more open.

    I’m not an apple fan, but I was hoping they would do some impressive things with this like they usually do whenever they enter a new field. I’m sure people will still buy it though because a lot of people just go with whatever apple makes.

  • macegr says:

    Another thing to think about: it’s going to spread the innovation-choking cancer of “Made for iPod” and “Works with iPhone” licensing. You cannot make a device that officially connects to this product without including Apple silicon in your design, for which you pay. Device manufacturers are (anonymously) already complaining about the price of entry into the Apple market. Hobbyists and hardware hackers are written out of the picture entirely. The iPhone could support Bluetooth SPP and connect with many devices, but it doesn’t. It could talk to devices over serial port through the dock connector, but that’s not allowed unless you are a big manufacturer and can pay $4+ per device to Apple. The iPad is the same thing, but the difference is it’s intended to take over a good chunk of the computing sector. There will be people who have only the iPad. I cannot independently make a device that these people can use without Apple’s approval.

  • Odin84gk says:

    When have they ever gone into a new field? They just make quality versions of what is out there.

  • StandAloneComplex says:

    Fuck you mr Jobs and fuck your proprietary software, FREE SOFTWARE IS THE ONLY WAY TO SURVIVE!

  • Oler says:

    I sold my original iPhone a while ago to buy an HD2. I love it but the browsing just isen’t as good as on the iphone(flash aside), altough the ressolution makes a huge difference. When i want to do a cassual browse in the couch, I grabb my netbook, and that is just not a great expierience with the little mouspad and keyboard. I had an Acer C300 convertible tablet, it needed a stylus, but for browsing it was perfect. To bad the touchscreen broke down.
    I would love to see a more affordable alternative with windows 7 or linux that has usb and does multitasking in a 2 month timeframe, like the Lenovo U1(no pricing yet, guessing it won’t be cheap) otherwise I will buy an iPad and get screwed next year with all the extras apple waited to add in.

  • TheFish says:

    I agree with you osgeld, im waiting for something more on the developer side, then i would buy it.

  • Angel says:

    IPad is almost all about hype, but Lenovo and Microsoft are going to bring similar devices in the next months. Apple has outrunned them with all the viral marketing which has surrounded the ipad all these last months. From the technical point of view, the ipad isnt anything marvelous, its just an arm with a “decent” screen and a fairly nice battery. No webcam? You have to upgrade the internal USB bus to add a new port. Thats no big deal.
    The big score of Apple is the deal with all the editorial world. They have showed with the ITunes store that they are serious people to the music editorial houses. Almost the same thing about the software developer world with the AppStore. Why not with books?
    I think those are reasons that are different this time with this tablet PC, and why it may finally boost the launch of this technology.
    And anyhow, the design is really high-tech.Havent we watched plenty of movies/tv-series these last years that show people with these devices?

  • lizardb0y says:

    Does anybody else see the iPad as an underspecced, unhackable, but expensive CrunchPad knockoff?

  • Jacob, if it’s $500 too much, then .. you wouldn’t take one if I paid you a dollar to do so?

    Dive into Mark had an interesting post on the topic of Apple’s strangling their developer community – http://diveintomark.org/archives/2010/01/29/tinkerers-sunset

    This just might be another episode of Apple snatching victory from the jaws of defeat.

    And the name of the device.. PR FAIL.

  • Prince says:

    Honestly, to me, it doesn’t look bad at all. It does all the thing’s I’d want out of the device. VoIP, taking note’s at school, reading books, play causal games, watch HD video. At $500 it’s a steal if you think of how much buying a book reader, iPod, and netbook would be, and it runs much better than them. I don’t have any of those already so it’s really aimed toward people like me, sure that audience is limited, doesn’t make me rage.

    The only thing I’d want is multitasking of course, so I can VoIP while doing other things… and maybe a stylus to come with it to draw.

  • googfan says:

    i already hate the ipad.

    steve jobs could put his seal of approval on a used napkin and people would buy it.

  • Angel says:

    By the way, beeing a Linux and OSS user,I really hate Apple

  • Oler says:

    @lizardb0y
    Are you calling apples mobile products unhackable?
    Oh, it does 720p playback on a non hd screen, something my netbook fails to do.

    Expensive -check
    Knockoff -check

  • jeditalian says:

    i heard it doesn’t support flash?
    the only thing i would do with an ipad is pour spaghetti sauce on it and upload it to youtube “Just how absorbent IS the iPad”

    Apple Fails. ( to sell me their products because they want to control too much. like “i’ll sell you this mp3 player but you can’t put your mp3s on it, you have to buy content from our store” and “I’ll sell you this phone that is supposed to be all awesome but you can’t use a memory card with it and you can’t bluetooth your friends to get music & stuff, you have to buy them from our store”
    iCantWait until they release the iGiveUP, iHaveRunOutOfProductNamesBegginingWith’i’.
    Steve Jobs, are you iRate?
    isn’t it iRonic? lol (are you mad?)
    but seriously, if you’re gonna make something like that, why not just make your standard netbook, with the standard netbook Atom processor, minus the keyboard, touchpad, hinges, plus a touchscreen, bluetooth, and USB PORTS?
    iMdefinitelynotbuyingone.
    suggested names for new apple devices: iFail, iSuck, iAmOverpriced, iAmLimited, iDontworkwithgloves.

  • I’m with Caleb on this one, sans the excitement.

  • osgeld says:

    “”When have they ever gone into a new field? They just make quality versions of what is out there.”"

    no they put them into quality cases, their products OMG, seriously I cant understand how a company that started the major pc revolution is still around and cant solder worth a crap

    ask my g4 with its cpu half self desoldered, or any macbook user in the last few years getting 3-4 repairs cause their gpu keeps poping off, or every other freakin model bursting into flames

    and the G5′s nuff said there, 10 grand for a computer that cant keep from self destruction?

  • Oler says:

    @prince
    I agree.

    There are cappacitive styli available.
    Multitasking probably will come after jailbraik.
    Yes i does hd but on a non hd screen, my netbook can’t.
    Lcd is way faster than e-ink.
    I dissagree on the ipod part, you just can’t pull this out of your pocket to chance what song is on.

  • Prince says:

    @Oler
    It does have an HD screen, it’s 768 tall, perfect for 720p content. HD has to do with height not width last time I checked.
    But on your other points, I do agree with you. I probably will buy a capacitive stylus and jailbreak it, and you’re right this does not fit in my pocket.

  • john says:

    I’m really really not going to buy one of these. I’m really disturbed by the trend that apple seems to be putting in place here. In addition to positioning themselves as the gatekeepers for all richly interactive content, Apple continues to drive a wedge between users and developers. Every programmer I know started out because they were raised with devices which lent themselves easily to the practice. Now we have a platform on which any sort of development environment is outlawed! This is not in the spirit of the internet that I was excited about back in the 90′s.

    So, what I want to see out of this is jailbreaking go mainstream. Someone needs to write a killer app to kill the app store. I’m not sure what said app should be, but if someone could get a viable flash player running on this thing I think it’d go a long way towards proving that it pays to actually control the devices you pay for.

  • oler says:

    @prince
    My bad, 720p indeed just refers to horizontal lines, 1280×720 is just a common resolution used.
    and 768 is often paired with 1366.
    You do get huge black bars or the sides hiddden when you zoom in due to the 4:3 format.
    I guess 16:9 or 16:10 isn’t verry handy in a tablet.

  • oler says:

    @john
    Freedom to devs!
    Multitasking and flash FTW

  • funky gibbon says:

    So does this freeze and give you twirly bananas too? just like a MAC when being asked to do anything more than power up, but my tip is save yourself some money and way till 3rd gen ipad comes out in a couple of months, one more question, is it upgradable like other apple products? i mean throw it away and buy a new one

  • John Ferin says:

    @osgeld

    Yes, you’re right – but that’s most people. Thus Apple will probably make a tidy sum selling it too.

  • therian says:

    “Today, Apple launched a computer that will never belong to its owner. Apple will use Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) to gain total veto power over the applications you use and the media you can view.”

    “The iPad’s unprecedented use of DRM to control all capabilities of a general purpose computer is a dangerous step backward for computing and for media distribution.”

    Listen this time it serious and dangerous for all of us. People this is historic moment, this event will affect our future, if Apple will get away with this soon everyone will follow their path and we will be doomed to have TV like computers and internet, with out right
    to “own” them.
    So please show Apple that you are not little Kids who need supervision all the time because they too stupid to be individual and make own decisions.
    The critical time to resist is now, in a month or even few weeks it will be too late, show Apple that they crossed the line this time.

  • wifigod says:

    While I must admit I’m not too happy by what was revealed (or lack of what was revealed like a camera, flash, sd slot, etc), I’m probably still going to purchase one of the lower-end 3G models because of the prepaid pricing plan they’ve developed with AT&T.

    Due to some financial mishaps after graduating college and not being able to pay my student loans (which has been remedied, but my credit still suffers) my credit isn’t the best in the world. AT&T (and Verizon, others were slightly cheaper) wanted/wants a $500 deposit for me to get an iPhone, which pushes my first month’s bill to just under $1000 when you figure in the cost of the phone and the first month’s bill. The ability to buy 3G internet access “when needed” is VERY appealing to me and I really wish there were other options like this out there.

    I can definitely justify $660 for a mobile internet enabled browser and SSH client for accessing all the various switches/routers at our remote clinics. It’s smaller than my laptop/bag combo that I normally have to lug around and there’s quite a variety of RDP clients in the App Store that could essentially turn this into a 10″ thin-client laptop terminal.

    Does anybody else know of any other way to get month-to-month 3G+ w/o costly (less than $100) hardware to buy? Hardware being a modemcard of some sort, I already have a laptop/netbook.

  • Ken says:

    I might have been impressed if it ran a real OS,
    but the ipads just a gimmick laden screen with little else. Personally I don’t even like the look of the thing it looks dated cumbersome and just waiting to fall behind a couch down a storm drain or get cracked in a back pack filled with books. Why are there books in the backpack when you have the Ipad? Why because the majority of books people use or read that aren’t a new york times best seller probably won’t be readily available. Why can’t they actually put forth some effort into making what they have more robust and modification friendly instead of loading poor IT people with devices that suck at integration. I can’t wait to see our students figiting with these and wondering why they can’t hook it up to the projector like the other students with real netbooks and laptops.

  • Mr. Q says:

    I’ve been looking for something like that, not for me but for my parents. They don’t understand how to use computers and even after long hours of trying to tech them they can’t cope with all this double vs single click debacle. The bar on the bottom showing windows is impossible to comprehend (win xp), no matter how many times I explain it they will never get the concept and are confused then a mail program opens a word document.

    This is ideal for them to check photos, witch they can’t do themselves but sometimes ask me to put on for them… No flash support kinds kills it though as a web browser though – can’t play video on news sites… If I here in that keynote, when steve had that no-flash-plugin on the screen I would just stand up then and there and shouted “a browser without flash support this day and age? fuck you Steve!” and walked out. Maybe some bad press about that on release day make them think next time…

    $500 it’s a lot for a digital photo album, but no other product on the market I seen would bring it even close to being computer-illiterate friendly. Of course I will need to upload pictures for them.

  • anon says:

    wow, I’m really surprised by all the negative response to the iPad. I am beginning to wonder how many of you people are shills for the competitors and if you aren’t, you are all a bunch of fucking tools.

    How excited were people when the crunchpad was being developed? This device is 10x better in every way and will absolutely dominate its market. It’s offered in two versions so you aren’t forced into a 3G tax.

    My god how blind are you people? Can you imagine going to the doctor and the receptionist hands you an iPad to fill out your information on? Or any other service oriented place?

    I do plan on buying one, probably even the 3G version considering how cheap the bandwidth plans are. I might wait until the second or third generation, but I kind of doubt it.

    As for hacking, I think an hd upgrade is in order, but i think i’ll let someone else figure it out first.

  • Eric says:

    so in the end, it’s a big ipod touch?

    at least it’s cheaper that the (initial) price of the iPhone

  • viperware says:

    @Prince
    Actually, it does not have an “HD” screen. The lowest resolution HD is 720p. 720p is a 16:9 resolution. Being binded to that aspect ratio, your max scalability is governed by the vertical lines. In this case 1024. 1024 with a 16:9 counterpart is 1024×576. This resolution is called 576p and is considered EDTV (enhanced definition). So the ipad technically scales 720p video to it’s 576p display.

  • therian says:

    “1976: July – The Apple I computer board is sold in kit form, and delivered to stores by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. Price: US$666.66″

    Do you see twisted game Steve Jobs playing? he encrypt message himself in price and name of device, that we will be doomed if we use Apple, just like biblical meaning of fruit

  • baobrien says:

    @therian
    Steve Wozniak chose the price on the Apple I. He was Atheist. He liked repeating numbers. He didn’t know what it meant until people pointed it out to him.

    I still don’t like the iPad.

  • viperware says:

    @anon
    Yeah, a $1000 fabrege` glass tablet instead of 25 cents worth of paper, pen, and clipboard to be handled by people who may not know how to tie their shoes. I can see this saving lots of money for an already messed up healthcare system. Better get a launch model before Blue Shield buys them all up for all their providers. HD upgrade hack? Really? Better check the shed again and see if there’s a missing pitchspoon.

  • b0red says:

    I guess a lot of guys miss the point on the product. For the entry level price, it is just $10 more expensive than a Kindle DX. Kindle R.I.P.

    I see the iPad killing the Kindle, and selling millions of units to the same market that already bought millions of Kindles (and lots of kindles in the dumpsters or waiting to be hacked). I see iTunes selling books, and Apple making a ton of money out of the book market… plus music… plus movies…. they are just expanding the intellectual property they can sell on iTunes, and creating the product for it.

    Seriously, the guys at amazon, and barnes and noble, and sony and every other e-book reader be really worried now.

  • kb says:

    Wow, this topic was perfect for revealing the ratio of adults to adolescents in the Hack-a-Day community.

    If you don’t like Apple products just don’t buy them. Some of us like Apple products, and not because we’re drones. We like them for the usability, the great software and attention to the human interface.

    So, to the point, I love my MacBook Pro and my iPhone, but I’m not sure I see an iPad in my future. In truth, I was hoping that all the rumors of a tablet would turn out to be false and that something more interesting would have been revealed. Then again, when the iPod first rolled out I was disappointed as well. However, I think that the user space for the iPad is going to grow because I’m sure the iPad will iterate fairly quickly just as the iPod did.

    I also would have liked to see the iPad be more of a computer than a large iPhone that will be more difficult to develop for.

  • Frogz says:

    everyone!
    i just found it runs on a Motorola 68000 with 4k of ram and runs internet exploror 0.024(internal alpha) in kiosk mode

  • grovensien says:

    All the fussing and fighting! Initially i was unimpressed with the bubblegum looking apps that were demo’d, however imagine the apps that could be developed on this platform!

    Come on, it looks like a solid piece of hardware, could be used for all sorts of multitouch midi hardware control. Think of the lemur!

    Yeah apple have lost touch with the creative people but apple products are far from unhackable, just try harder!

    Its interesting how angry people get about apple products i think most are just closet fanboys! Hiding in their cupboards wishing they had that macbook pro!

    flame on!

  • jhamblett says:

    I am not really sure where this fits in within the sphere of computing devices. Without its add-on keyboard it is essentially an iPhone with gigantism without native voice support (Yes I know it is possible to use the 3G radio and voip but that is cheating) and with the keyboard it is a netbook without any of the advantages (like multitasking, USB, free world apps etc).
    That said it probably wont stop the device selling like hotcakes – I fully expect to see people tout these on/in public transport and coffee shops/bars in the near future.
    As for copycat devices not constrained to Apples cult-like restrictions it would still seem to me like someone snapped the keyboard off of a touchscreen netbook…

  • DanS says:

    It’s just a big iPod, built in New Jersey.

  • no says:

    really? really? i cant believe people that go to a site like hackaday could possibly like this device. its over priced, the highest model only has 64gb. no ports, no custom software. everything this device is, a cheaper tablet does better save for weight. what can this thing do for the hacking community? nothing. it would have to be unlocked and even then the hardware is limited and overpriced. its just disgusting to see fans of this device calling anyone that doesn’t love it derogatory terms. no thanks. i already hated the new inexperienced posters of content (heres looking at you mike) but now the community has gone mainstream and falls for hype. hacking is not about what is pretty or useable. its about what you can do with it. its about taking something cheap and turning it into something powerful. no i for one am done with this site. this site lost its way when it lost its veterans. anyone remember when this first came out and it was a true hacking site. i do. i remember when they posted the best macintosh wifi hack on the net. bet nobody here remembers that. the audience has changed to consumers, not creators and tinkerers, and i am not part of the new audienec.

  • banana9000 says:

    I’m glad to see this finally get under way.

    Once apple manages to pull in enough market share with a pure DRM play, Microsoft will quickly follow. The biggest difference between Vista and Windows 7 is pretty much that they’ve worked out the bugs in the DRM so that it doesn’t cause issues for people who don’t file share.

    How many people know the story of the netbook maker who captures the built-in webcam photo on first log-in… and sends it home while checking for updates? Yes, now your dossier has a picture. That’s pretty cool, isn’t it?

    What I really look forward to is widespread IPV6 rollouts. IPV6 = no nat required – finally, we’ll be able to absolutely track where you go and what you do on the internet with you… And no more browser tricks required.

    Run firefox? It has unique per install IDs.
    Run IE? Even worse.
    Any browser that runs flash has uniquely trackable information. Even if you’re crafty, the first time your wife, son or brother-in-law checks into hotmail, yahoo or gmail, you’re no longer anonymous.

    You cannot hide your tracks anymore, little mice!
    So be very, very good!

  • AnthonyDi says:

    I honestly don’t understand the point to it. If I’m at home I can use one of my computers/tablet/netbook if I’m somewhere else I can use my iPhone where does this thing come in as practical use?

    Don’t get me wrong its a cool gadget but it just seems like an iTouch with a bigger screen.

    ps I think it should have a webcam and a larger hard drive

  • The Ideanator says:

    Marketing 101, he took it.
    How he describes it is quite lulzy IMO, but either way its pretty sweet, i wonder when an open source clone of this will be manufactured, preferably heavier duty than this.

  • ob1 says:

    Think about all the good brought to our world by braindead and pretty software and hardware: without braindead, zombie-proof stuff we’d be here surfing the web on emacs. By pushing the boundaries of simplicity you have the chance to go hardcore when you want to, and feel proud that chanllenged people can enjoy tech as well

  • ob1 says:

    I mean ‘challenged’ (‘errare humanum est’)

  • captain says:

    Starfleet Command is laughing at this right now. “We’re we actually that stupid and redundant in the early twenty-first century?”

    Yeah. Apple, DOES have the most advanced technology on this planet, but it’s not perfect. On this note, how is it that Microsoft got the Tablet PC concept right and Apple did not?

    I have always wondered this in Earth history. Fascinating, indeed. Wait till you see what Apple comes up with next. I can’t tell you, though.

    Temporal Prime Directive.

  • Osgeld says:

    “My god how blind are you people? Can you imagine going to the doctor and the receptionist hands you an iPad to fill out your information on? Or any other service oriented place?”

    yes thank you, finally a way I can have my medical records locked into a propitiatory device that is in constant link with its parent company

    The star trek notion is cool, and yea I want that also, but I personally dont want apple to control every single thing about it

    On a side note, I cant help but wonder if Steve Jobs didnt stumble on a time machine jump years into the future, video taped himself at age 80, then came back to 84 for the commercial

  • captain says:

    P.S. Amazon Kindle, Barnes and Noble’s Nook and Sony Reader. These e-paper solutions already exist. What was Apple thinking?

    Would it not be easy enough for Apple to merge with Sony or buy the technology from a company like Sony and just come up with something feasible? (*hint, hint*)

  • thecityspiders says:

    i’m not a fan of mac so i can truly say there is not a single aspect of a portable device with out open ended media support,flash player support,flash drive ports of any kind or general usefulness beside being a giant I-Touch.
    With that said i am going to wait on a more useful’ less restricted device with actual ports and full blu-tooth support. which IMHO is going to be easier to do than some have suggested.
    on another note why hate Apple? when you can just move along and ignore the trivial hype?what should be a larger concern is the workmanship that is put into ANY device these days …. a crashing economy suggests those with out money are likely leaving control in the hands of those that are irresponsible and dubious at best…. if you do not like some thing {change it} especially the minds of those in control … this is a democracy in a pseudo republic. stand up or get trampled appl relies on the same business all other companies do …tell you favorite brand you would like these types of products and HOW you would like them to be…don’t just BITCH….

    this is,
    TheCitySpiders

  • Grayda says:

    And just like the iPod and iPhone, you will have to wait a few years or hack your device to get the features you actually need, that could have been present right from the start. It’s a clever marketing ploy by Apple. They sit around, release a stripped down device and with software and hardware revisions make it into a decent device, then people praise how innovative they are. Case in point: MMS on the iPhone. EVERY phone I’ve had from my SIemens MC60 upwards has had MMS capabilities built right in. iPhone didn’t have one until 3.0 and when they did, “oooh MMS! Apple are so clever!”. It could have been done from day one! Case two in point: Photos on iPods. Doable from day one, never implemented. When it is, millions of sales for Apple and praise from the press. Even my cheapo $20 Chinese player can do that!

  • Ben Wright says:

    I have an ipod touch, and I find it quite usefull for sitting on the couch and checking email/ this site when we are spending time together and I don’t like what she is watching but feel obligated to be in the same room with her. I use the X-copy for PSP to rip movies that I can drag onto the ipod a bit cheaper than itunes. Iv’e played countless games for free that itunes gives away. I see a big market for rented movie watching and book reading with this kind of device.

  • Alan Parekh says:

    We will have to see what happens but my prediction is it will fail to catch on. I would much prefer to have a real laptop in every situation I can think of.

  • Whatnot says:

    The effect of the ipad I’d expect or should I say would like to see is more attention to the specs on the screens with things like netbooks, apple specifically went for a quality IPS panel and that’s something you’d think a company like samsung and such would do, sell a netbook and such and specifically highlight that is has a quality IPS panel in it, since samsung is a monitor manufacturer and sells netbooks they would be in a good position for it, but they aren’t the only ones that could differentiate their offering that way.

    The ipad itself is a non-entity really, as caleb says you’d hope someone would hack it up into a usable thing, but it didn’t pan out so much with the iphone/touch so why bother hoping for that really, I think it makes more sense in hoping for the knockoffs and trust the imitations will be way better and then finding a nice one in those offerings .

    So basically I agree with caleb’s sentiments.

  • Whatnot says:

    Best apple can expect from the ipad release is a boost in sales of iphones and ipod rtouch, since they seem so nice and small now, so comfortably pocketable and easy to hold.
    I think they might have released them in the wrong order.

  • thecityspiders says:

    The “knock off’s”" will be pretty sweet if the trends continue….people will demand these features and also liken to have an open development platform as others have often suggested before. it is a good thing and also a sign of the times as paper is pushed aside for endless meglomedia…
    I for one am looking forward to the up and coming variations of the concepts this has presented.
    I honestly hope Apple consumers are happy with it so that it will spur more trustworthy products that can be used and customized unlike the ipad/ipod/iphone/imac/idontcares

    Signing off,
    The City Spiders

  • Haku says:

    How long til someone starts selling iPhone/iTouch upgrade kits* to turn them into an iPad?

    *kit content: One A4 sized fresnel lens.

  • freedom says:

    i just wish it ran a real os like a mac tablet but this is just a big ipod touch

  • Jethrine says:

    in 24 months we get to do clothing hacks… installing normal sized pockets on everything. I’m going out to buy a lifetime supply of levis tomorrow.

  • kb says:

    @no
    “its just disgusting to see fans of this device calling anyone that doesn’t love it derogatory terms. ”

    This is a joke, right? You ARE kidding, right? It is the PC & Linux crowd that calls Mac users “drones,” “kool aid drinkers,” and “gay.”

    Give me a break.

  • swingaroo says:

    People will buy it anyway. By thousands. There are hordes of people who don’t need the device to be hackable or compatible or something. It’s pretty, it’s heavily marketed, it’s easy, so your mom can use it. Just enough for million sales.

    I personally would like the x86-compatible tablet with Pixel Qi display, please. HP tc1100 was a killer. Now when we have Atom, Ion, Tegra etc, they can make something in this form factor, which would be a serial murderer.

  • RoboGuy says:

    I bought an iPad about half a year ago. It’s pretty neat – came with a full OS, several ports, a giant screen (in comparison to this new model here), a processor that humiliates this new one, and is highly customizable. In fact I could (and did) immidiately install a secondary OS – Kubuntu Linux. Got the whole thing for $300, too.

    Oh, wait. I bought a freaking laptop.

    To all those saying “It’s got great hardware”…Sorry to say, it really doesn’t. It’s basically a crappy netbook w/ a capacitive touch screen slapped on so that I can’t use it for any purposes I care about (eg. word processing, programming, model editing, non-casual videogames, freaking Flash playback, etc.).

    oh, and
    @kb
    “It is the PC & Linux crowd that calls Mac users “drones,” “kool aid drinkers,” and “gay.””

    Have you seen an Apple ad recently? Notice how it was an attack ad?

    Seen a Windows ad recently (btw Macs are PCs)? Notice how it was positive about Windows & didn’t attack Apple?

    Seen a Linux ad recently? No, you didn’t.

    Windows has a much bigger usage than Apple’s PC OSes, so it makes sense for you to see more Apple hate online, simply because more people hate Apple – not because Windows & Linux users are evil scumbags.

  • Prince says:

    @RoboGuy
    “Notice how it was positive about Windows & didn’t attack Apple?”

    Didn’t attack Apple? Nearly every “I’m a PC” ad that showed people buying laptops had them saying “I guess I’m not cool enough for a Mac” or something around those lines, pretty sure that’s a direct bash.

  • RockerX says:

    I can’t wait till I see an ‘ipoke’ or ‘idab’… HURRY CHINESE KNOCK-OFF MANUFACTURERS!!!!

  • Wpm says:

    I heard in a couple months they’re coming out with a
    20 inch version called the Max-iPad

  • Walky says:

    It’s just…. the largest PDA I’ve ever seen!

  • Ugly American says:

    iPad only belongs on Hack a Day if it had been rooted.

    Apple’s tablet entry is underpowered, overpriced and DRMed.

    In terms of price, performance & hackability, there are other tablets coming with the Tegra 2 chipset which means a well documented dual core ARM CPU with dedicated gfx acceleration by Nvidia. The Tegra 2 prototypes were shown in person at CES and can play 1920x1080p video, have more RAM, multitask, have real USB ports and can run GNU+Linux and NetBSD.

  • Koplin says:

    Steve Jobs = Apple, when he dies so will is company and by the look of him lately, that wont be too long. Has he changed the landscape of computers, and how we view and use technology YES, debate, argue it doesn’t matter most of you are probably not old enough to remember they days before the internet or before Apple and Job’s line of ripoffs.

    Apple used to be a lot of things, and people have a lot of expectation. Apple’s products have always been more expensive compared to other products but what you pay for is the brand. If you fall for that pit then the “extras” will kill you. AT&T is to the iPhone what all the adapters you need to make the iPad a netbook.

    I have been in computers for 30+ years! They are all tools. They will all die and leave you with big holes in your pockets. Cray, Kaypro, Commodore, Atari, Tandy, VAX, Texas Instruments, Compaq, (Mosaic, Netscape) etc the list is long but I have used them all and eventually something better comes around. Some work and have long life’s others not so much. Linux, Windows, OSX the mythical great “Cloud” (caugh *google*).

    I am sure Apple’s agreements with AT&T, music copyright holders, hardware accessory’s vendors are all like working for Apple or being an Apple consumer. Do it there way or take the highway. This kind of bulling only works so long as you have the market captured. They have to keep releasing new crap or buy out the competition before its a viable option. If those options don’t work, pay lots of money to lawyers to make the other companies life miserable. Apple only exists now because of Microsoft’s handout.

    http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-202143.html

    How does all this relate to the iPad, next year you will be going what the hell was an iPad? Then you will go off and find something else to complain about. :)

  • Hubble Trouble says:

    Saw the “Pirates of Silicon Valley” movie and kept rooting for him to get killed in the bloody shootout between Gates and his thugs.

  • chuckt says:

    I already have too many electronic devices and it is fun packing them for the shore.

    It is thin and it will probably crack once you drop it.

    I have a bunch of nail marks in my notebook keyboard from my wife so typing on a tablet will only be worse. Make sure you have plenty of windex.

    I won’t buy Apple products or any with DRM.

  • Hubble Trouble says:

    People will be breathlessly searching YouTube for the “unboxing of the iPad” video-I look forward to the “pine boxing of Jobs”.

  • cantido says:

    If it wasn’t an apple product there would be zero discussion of this thing… but alas it’s an apple product and that makes it “special”. I’m not bashing apple, I’m writing this on a macbook (running debian),.. but why can “apple people” never give you a straight answer on things. This is an argument I had today.

    me: ok, look I don’t care either way.. but tell me any resounding, ground shaking, amazing feature of any apple “product”.

    them: they’re easy to use!

    me: well that’s debatable and a lot of that will be down to personal tastes won’t it? Do you have anything of technical merit to back up your argument? Proof of “ease of use”

    them: n number of people are using it! they must be right

    me: but more people are using windows, 90% of the market share is windows on the desktop… so windows must be doing something right too?

    them: erm erm you’re twisting what I’m saying.. anyways the build quality is outstanding.

    me: what like earphone jacks that break after minimal use, machines that are shipped broken.. again technical merit?

    them: ugh ugh, it’s made out of dolphin friendly plastic!

    there are plently of reasons why you might consider apple products over other products.. for example.. um I can’t actually think of any. Oh maybe some of the mixed CPU/GPU processing stuff apple are coming up with is interesting. But if you argue about an apple product you just go around in circles and the end product is that you establish the other party has no ability to consider things based on merit or even their own needs and is too stupid to use anything that hasn’t been reduced down to the simplest hand-holding mush imaginable (it’s user friendly!).

    iPad.. meh. other devices are out there that do more, but jobs didn’t hold it up and say “this is going to do x” so no one cares. Ask anyone the merit of the device, where it fits into their needs.. “aaa my gran could use it to browse the internet, its sooo user friendly!”, “ok, so you’re gran can’t operate an modern intuitive graphical environment as shipped by windows, any linux distro, hell even solaris… but she can navigate her way around the shit hole that we call the interwebs? right”.

  • hrpuffnstuff says:

    WTF is it with people and Adobe Flash? Stop whining about the phones not having it and whine to the company who owns Flash and that’s Adobe.
    It isnt up to the phone companies so much as Adobe to port Flash to devices. Stop blaming manufacturers and phone companies like Verizon and Tmobile and email Adobe.
    It effin amazes me at the constant drone about lack of Flash. You can have the security prone cpu sucking Flash on your phone, leave mine alone

  • amk says:

    The iPad had a very basic flaw: It doesn’t fit in my pocket, so when I’m done using it I’ll need a bag or case to store it in. Unfortunately that bag currently contains my laptop which happens to be much more versatile and useful than an iPad.

  • Schell says:

    >>lizardBoy
    yeah – looks like a crunchpad – but less good.

  • Mr Foo says:

    As far as I’m concerned, it’s a flawed product, but that’s to do with where it’s aimed, not with any technical problems. What I wanted was a replacement for my 12 year old Newton, not a shiny A4 pad with no handwriting recognition. Still, that’s a gripe from an old hand in the mobile industry, not from the target market.

    For those claiming the crunchpad or other tablet computers are somehow “better”, get real. What Apple know how to do is put together some pretty average hardware, and make it fly, make it work in a way that nobody else can. Consider the way the iPhone works – when it came out people were “meh, it’s got no buttons”, but pretty much every smartphone is now an iPhone clone. And yet, somehow, apple’s overpriced iPhone continues to sell by the truckload. Why? Because the clones are about as appealing to use as a sackload of sick. I found (yes, really, it was buried in the snow at work after dropping out of a client’s pocket) a windows-based smartphone. One button? check. Big screen? check. looks a bit like an iPhone? check. I spent an hour or so trying to get at the contacts on the (locked) SIM, gave up, and handed it in to the lost property people. If it’s not claimed at the end of the season, it’s mine, but frankly, I don’t want it. It was vile to use.

    As for flash:

    A: The videos clearly show flash video running, Apple aren’t stupid enough to fake something like that, they’d get sued.
    B: Apple have hung their hat on *standards compliant* HTML5 video as opposed to *inaccessible, proprietary* flash (see http://youtube.com/html5)
    C: Flash has always run like crap on the Mac, but that’s not Apple’s fault, it’s Adobe’s. A flash-based youtube video embedded in a webpage grabs 40+% of CPU on my iMac, whereas I can play HD html5 video, fullscreen or windowed, or zooming between the two fluidly, on the fly, using well under 5% CPU.

    iPad is likely to be to the tablet market what iPod was to MP3 players. Before – a few geeks had them. After – everyone has one, and the majority are sold by Apple.

  • Rat says:

    “As for flash:

    A: The videos clearly show flash video running, Apple aren’t stupid enough to fake something like that, they’d get sued.”

    Guess what? Adobe released images showing what webpages REALLY look like on the iPad.

    There is no Flash support. Apple, as usual, is misleading.

    the iPad is probably the least imaginative (and considering how their entire business model exists around ripping off other people’s stuff and putting it in pretty packages) “product” yet. And that’s actually saying something.

    Oh look, we made an iPod touch bigger!

    Apple’s released a lot of things I thought were gold covered turds, but this iPad is a real piece of crap.

    If you think Netbooks are crap. At least they can run more than one application at a time!

    AND browse with Flash!

    AND don’t have DRM! AND have a user replaceable battery. AND have storage expansion. AND have a keyboard. AND…

    The iPad is fail on every level.

  • Mr Foo says:

    >> their entire business model exists around ripping off other people’s stuff and putting it in pretty packages

    Please expand on this.

    >> The iPad is fail on every level.

    And it will still sell more in a month than every other tablet device ever made rolled together.

  • Frogz says:

    i just wanna visit pown.it and alluc on my phone, damn you adobe!
    damn you palm!

  • Reggie says:

    When the hell are the US/EU goverments going to bring an anti-trust case against apple and their restrictive/industry retarding practices? Would that be before or after consumers have filled apples pockets so their big enough to plunder?

    Steve Jobs alone should be arrested for tucking his jumper into his trousers. All those PR gurus and no one has told him he looks like a cock.

  • blue carbuncle says:

    I am loving hating on the iPad! Seriously, no multitasking, flash, or a douche-level checking app? They steal from UNIX while making a fuss about MS and Xerox. Jobs is a complete egomaniac that surrounds himself with yes men. And wonderful proprietary hardware and a nice 3% of the market share lol. Did anyone else mention apple will take a bath on this one lol?

  • Mr Foo says:

    >> When the hell are the US/EU goverments going to bring an anti-trust case against apple and their restrictive/industry retarding practices?

    At about the time Satan is skating to work.

    There’s nothing anticompetitive in this. Apple have released a tablet device. Other tablet devices exist. They aren’t pressuring other manufacturers not to make tablet devices, or to only put Apple’s operating system on their tablets. If you don’t like Apple’s tablet device, go and buy a different tablet device, and enjoy iy.

    The same goes for mobile phones. If you don’t like iPhones, don’t buy an iPhone. Buy a Blackberry, or a Nokia, or a Motorola, or, or, or…

    Again, the same goes for (desktop) computers – don’t like Apple’s range? Go buy something else. MP3 players? It’s not like Apple have put Creative or any of the thousands of other MP3 device makers out of business, is it? Buy yourself a Zune. Get with the social, or something.

  • LF4 says:

    My initial thought was “Look a huge iPhone!!!” which is pretty much it. An iPhone with a big display and faster processor. Pretty looking (like most of Apple products) but functional and innovative I don’t think.

  • Jeff says:

    well, I’m certainly underwhelmed. Hopefully it gets a few people to see a kindle or nook (perhaps to me) and then dies out quietly. So I’ll have a nice toy with e-ink, and the world won’t have to deal with a giant ipod touch

  • kris says:

    If it has the same lousy singleprocessing UI as the iphone, this is going to be the most horrible invention since the square wheel…

  • ak77 says:

    What a lot of fucking FUD.

    I don’t care about the iPad either way, but people *so* invested in hating Apple are so much sadder than the equivalent fanboys.

    I enjoy an even tempered discussion of Apple’s failings as well as its successes, but when that’s replaced with impassioned half-truths and squealing misinformation from people with little actual experience, its indicative of the actual-energy the haters put into a company that they don’t need to patronise nor waste their time on.

    They have chosen to invest their time in something they hate.

    I could understand the Microsoft hate, back in the day, when there really was little alternative to a client handing you some locked-in MS formatted file. Shouting about it eventually gave us open standards and ways around the MS clique. But if you don’t like Apple, there is really no reason for you to be dealing wih them.

    “But the media and my favourite blog won’t stop talking about Apple!”

    Find a new favourite blog then, and ignore that one-more-story like you ignore all the other stories about shit you don’t care about. The problem is you DO care, so sort it out and stop caring. If you stopped clicking the blog-links and generating such intense “debate”, the media/blogs wouldn’t report on it so much.

    And here’s a tip to the Linux fans: try get the Windows bitches to really hate you, seems to drive up the public profile no end and we might finally see that Year of the Linux Desktop.

  • localroger says:

    @wifigod — both Sprint and Verizon offer the Alcatel MiFi 2200 3g-wifi bridge. I got mine from Verizon for $29 after $50 rebate and the 5 gig per month data plan is $60; they have a 250 meg plan for $30 if you’re cheap and won’t use it much. This device acts like a wifi router so any wifi device can get to the internet via 3g without installing any drivers or special software.

  • mike says:

    Unlike the Iphone/Itouch theres nothing really innovative about this except nice packaging. Considering that similar devices have been around, and considering the platform restrictions other netbooks will win here. Lacking competition and hype in the tablet sector have kept prices quite high so we should really be happy about the move. There’s probably good money to be made programming initial apps for this devie… We can hope other manufacturer (lenovo) will provide affordable windowsxp/7/linux touchpad tablets soon… Hackers/hardware developers will naturally prefer the open platforms…

  • Ross E says:

    Jakob, I love you simply for sharing my vendetta against apple

  • funky gibbon says:

    It’s so funny to read all the responces here, the only other product to cause this much keyboard bashing is the Arduino, I dont like Apple products, their slow, overpriced and restricted by licensing, Lookup ipod flee parody, it’s an old parody but so true of apple products

  • Hackaday.com I will get http://www.hackaday.com and the skull tattooed on my arm. If you buy me Ipad…

    makerofdesign@yahoo.com and Im over the age of 18
    I will send a video of it as prof or i can come to you. if you know a good tattoo guy!!!

  • ak77 says:

    I agree that the hardware on the iPad isn’t that innovative. But I think the thing that’s going to work (eg. shift units) is removing the desktop metaphor from the OS and making a limited-purpose appliance, rather than a full-spectrum ‘computer’.

    I think that the limitations in the iPad OS will make it a bigger hit than other tablets, because it doesn’t have any of the negative baggage non-geeks have with using computers; painful installs, viruses, arbitrary directory structures, etc.

    No-one (in the real world) expects multi-tasking and root access from their Kindle or their dumbphone. Those products have unambiguous purposes, and are not trying to be “computers”, per se. They do what they do. iPad happens to be expandable (va apps) to do more things, but they are still single discrete tasks, without a lot of hassle.

    Also, until there is a non-desktop interpretation of W7 there is unlikely to be a hugely successful WIndows based tablet (whether or not there is a hugely successful iPad). I understand there are a number of Linux touch-OS solutions, that don’t use the desktop metaphor, so there may be some good news there.

  • Reggie says:

    it’ll be another locked in device, tied to X format and restrictive practices on 3rd parties writing their own software. That’s the non-innovating bit. Then of course there is the near saturation point in advertising for apple products, I am truly numb from it all, I shouldn’t have to constantly avoid places to not be annoyed by another condescending advert because I chose not to buy their product (same as apple users shouldn’t have to put up with the M$ bull).

  • blub says:

    I think the iPad will be a scuccess simply because it’s available from a trusted company…
    Of course there are a lot of other tablets out there but nobody sells them… Go to your next electronic market and try to find a tablet.. There will only be some overpriced and slow x86 hardware with an OS that is not realy thought to run on a tablet… if there are tablets at all…

    So the iPad will sell simply because it’s available and usable.

  • Hubble Trouble says:

    The iPad is thinner than Jobs.

  • ITIL Prince says:

    There are plenty of good points here, but I’d like to try to add a few news ones.

    Apple products are not for the frugal. They are aimed at people with disposable income. The average hacker or maker is right on the edge of having true disposable income, so the market is limited right there.

    Apple products are about design. Johnnie Ive and Steve Jobs put together sexy products (and sometimes the Newton). As an audience, we tend to build using bare wires and boards. Clearly there is limited appeal for good design by itself.

    Apple products are modal. Steve said many years ago that he wanted an interface that was easy to use (I read it somewhere on Gizmodo, if you want to find it). Modal interfaces mean the iPhone looks like a phone when you want it to be a phone, and looks like a calculator when you need one. It’s not like a Windows system or even an OS X system where the phone and calculator work at the same time. Apple is focusing their mobile market on having a flexible device that is readily understood by non-technical people.

    That’s the secret, folks: “non-technical people”. Here, they aren’t getting any respect for dumbing down interfaces or hiding complexity behind well-designed curtains. It’s not that they’re doing the wrong thing, it’s just the wrong thing for this site’s readers.

    Sorry, but I’m an old fart with a hint of disposable income, so I bought my first iPod Touch a couple of years ago, and I’m going to stay in this space for a while. And yes, it did seem to cut back on my making. So that’s a bad thing, I guess.

  • RoboGuy says:

    Back @ Prince:

    I don’t recall that, but I’ll take your word for it.

    Still, the direct attacks on Microsoft by Apple are much more consistent – and you really can’t argue that Apple doesn’t like to show off its “style.”

    The point is, Apple’s not all that considerate to a company that once bailed them out and is largely passive these days.

  • Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Hack a Day serves up fresh hacks each day, every day from around the web as well as hacking related news.

    Send us your hacks










         




    Hacks

    Resources