Basement fusion reactor

posted Feb 19th 2010 1:00pm by
filed under: misc hacks

Do you ever wonder what projects your neighbors have going on in their basements? [Will Jack's] neighbors might be surprised to find he’s building a fusion reactor. The first step toward completing a Farsworth-Hirsch Fusor is up and running. The picture above shows heated plasma contained in a magnetic field. Next he just needs to up the voltage and inject some deuterium.

Yeah right! Deuterium, aka heavy water, is extremely rare and very difficult to refine. If you’re not familiar with the substance, you should get your hands on the NOVA episode: Hitler’s Sunken Secrets.

We’re glad to see that [Will Jack] is donning a lead vest for protections.  [Will O'Brien] cautioned us about the stray X-rays these things produce when he covered fusors back in 2007.



103 Responses to Basement fusion reactor

  • k0ldBurn says:

    And I thought I was badass when I rebuilt a broken roomba and got it to run again… This is awesome

  • stevetronics says:

    Deuterium is actually not that uncommon: it it roughly 1:6500 for hydrogen to deuterium atom for atom. That sound like a lot, but when you consider the sheer number of hydrogen atoms on earth, there’s a lot of deuterium around.

  • Will Jack says:

    Actually, deuterium isn’t that hard to obtain, as it is not radioactive and is sold in lecture bottles for about $150, however tritium (helium 3) is very hard to obtain by an amateur as it is radioactive.

  • Nwyawka says:

    If this unit is Farnsworth Fusors then there is no magnetic confinement of plasma. Fusors use inertial electrostatic confinement.

  • Will Jack says:

    Nwyaka- you are correct, this is a farnsworth-hirch type fusor and it does use IEC confinement, tokamak fusors use magnetic confinement, however, the ions in it are accelerated due to the inner grid’s negative electromagnetic charge.

  • Will Jack says:

    Aleksejes- David Hahn’s plan was to build a “breeder” reactor to create fissionable elements and as result, x-rays poured out of his device. In farnsworth fusors, x- rays usually do not appear until the input voltage reaches about 40 kv, which is far higher than mine, which has an input voltage of about -9500 volts DC (from a 15 kv neon sign transformer, full wave recified)

  • Brianmanden says:

    Deuterium == Hydrogen 2
    Deuterium != Heavy Water
    Tritium == Hydrogen 3
    Tritium != Helium 3

    FYI:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_hydrogen

  • Digital says:

    Good News everybody, I’ve just invented a new way to kill all of us. now if you’d all stop complaining I’d like to get on with the experiment!

  • Stu says:

    *checking if its April 1st*

    *nope*
    This is a joke, right?
    People experimenting with radioactive substances and apparatus in their homes!? In neighbourhoods?
    Its downright irresponsible. Oh yeah its great if HE wears a lead vest, how about every other poor sod in his neighborhood, and beyond? Babies and children included? Or have we all forgotten that radioactivity travels clean through 1000 house walls? That renders it more dangerous than an LSD production lab.
    Call the police on the scum, he should be locked away.

  • Snard says:

    Good news everyone!

  • Will Jack says:

    @ stu – No dangerous radiation (X-Ray, Neutron, ETC.) is emitted from this device.UV radiation is produced, but the levels are not harmful, plus, I have UV protected contacts.

  • Will Jack says:

    It is practically a fancy neon light

  • 24601 says:

    Do a little research Stu. There’s nothing radioactive about a Fusor.

  • answr42 says:

    Sure he may have a lead vest on to protect against EM radiation, but the real danger comes from the neutrons that are released if he ever gets this reaction running… I would suggest putting the reactor vessel in a deep pool if you value your life.

  • nave.notnilc says:

    @Stu
    err, stop spreading nonsense, as the builder said above, the voltage isn’t high enough to generate any radiation with significant penetrating power.

  • Will Jack says:

    Sorry for typo in previous comment, I meant hydrogen, not helium

  • 24601 says:

    Will: Pretty much, but they’re so much prettier than a standard neon, particularly the last image on this page: http://www.fusor.net/board/view.php?bn=fusor_images&key=1088538270&first=75

  • nave.notnilc says:

    ugh, this post is going to become a monstrous pile of nonsense and denying nonsense :P

    /me predicts 150+ comments

  • eDave says:

    D-D fusion reactions have a neutronicity (percent of energy released as neutrons) of 0.66.
    So once this thing is up and cooking deuterium neutron radiation could be more of a problem. But if it’s in a basement, I’d only be worried about anyone actually in the basement.

  • MS3FGX says:

    As others have said, this is a far cry from a fusion reactor, and is little more than a novelty; though still a very interesting project.

    This device is relatively harmless (certainly, other projects featured on HaD are more likely to kill you than this), any concern about this device is from confusion and misunderstanding of the technology.

    Sadly, it is mindsets like Stu’s that have criminally held back research like this (or anything involving nuclear, for that matter).

  • 24601 says:

    just have to watch out for the nuclearphobes who have the same reaction as Stu above, and try to have you arrested.

  • Will Jack says:

    When I start fusing deuterium, it will be remotely controlled. It will also have adequate shielding.

  • zengar says:

    I just love the continuing “fallout” from the cold war. Everything having to do with atomic power was shrouded with secrecy and miss-information, and as a result you now only need to say the word ‘nuclear’ to make some people’s brains turn off. Have you people ever played with a plasma globe? At this point it’s about the same level of danger.

    People have been building these in basements and garages for years. (not to take away from Will Jack’s achievement, just because people have done it before doesn’t make it any easier or less cool)

  • anon says:

    what you use that for? toasting some epic bread?

  • Stu says:

    @24601 @nave.notnilc – NO I will not do my research because I’m not the slightest bit interested in becoming a nuclear fusion scientist, I never claimed that it WOULD generate dangerous radiation, I’m just entitled to be concerned about nutjobs like this guy who could potentially generate dangerous radiation at some point.

    If the levels are likely to be dangerous, then he should go to jail for carrying out dangerous experiments in non-industrial areas. Its clearly non govt-authorised, totally unregulated, possibly under-shielded. Simple.

    It appears we have some closet nuclear technicians on this comments page, it seems. God knows there’s no concensus on these comments pages as to whether its dangerous or not! I can’t tell whether this shit produces radiation but its damned well irresponsible to find out in a neighbourhood!

  • Stu says:

    @MS3GFX – you are a dick. Simple.

  • eDave says:

    @Stu
    It should also be noted that though some ionizing radiation is highly penetrating, it still falls off with the square of the distance. It doesn’t have to go far before it falls down to an intensity that is indistinguishable from background radiation.

  • Will Jack says:

    @ Stu … did you just blatantly ignore everything I just said? Also, the neutron radiation that is emitted for these devices (when fusing) is incredibly small, and is very easily shielded.

  • jeditalian says:

    good thing its fusion not fission:)

  • poiso says:

    @Stu

    Best Be trolling, seriously, reading will teach you so much!

    STFU and appreciate when people are smarter then you are…. it’s ok to be scared about what you dont understand, just like when you where amazed at the toaster!

  • momotarosan says:

    counting down to Dec 1012, 10,9,8,7….

  • baobrien says:

    I know someone that is trying to build a ‘fusion reactor’. These projects are all very interesting.

  • nick says:

    @ Stu,

    you need to gtfo. take your crazy elsewhere.

  • lee says:

    Without any heavy hydrogens (ie extra neutrons) he is only doing what is called ion multipacting of whatever charged particles remain inside the presumed vacuum chamber.
    when he back-fills the vacuum with deuterium or tritium hopefully accelerating some of them into one another fast enough for fusion, he will be producing neutrons which is a radioactive byproduct. This is a pretty difficult task as the vacuum has to be strong, but its possible. if he gets arcing between the charge grids, he can also risk making some nasty x-rays, so good call with the lead vest. For the neutrons i heard borax, which apparently contains boron, is a good collector of excess neutrons.

  • CalcProgrammer1 says:

    @Stu

    Your mindset is why scientists are leaving the USA. People can’t advance science when stupid people like you can’t take any slight bit of risk. Do you think electricity was safe when people were discovering it? No way, and many people complained, but look at today, electricity is a must-have. Quit being an idiot and denying science, because science is going to move society forward, your stupid government and their pathetic regulations will only hold it back.

  • Will Jack says:

    Yes, borax in water is great neutron shielding.

  • Aleksejs says:

    Woah. I was just joking. :) Thought that remembering David Hahn would make everyone smile.

  • MS3FGX says:

    I don’t know what’s worse, somebody making inaccurate comments and fear-mongering; or a person who admits to doing it and says he doesn’t have any intention on getting accurate information because learning doesn’t interest him.

  • Erethon says:

    @MS3FGX’s last comment: Well said dude, well said.

  • Will Jack says:

    +1 Internets to MS3FGX !

  • M4CGYV3R says:

    There are a lot safer and more scientific ways to build a Farnsworth Fusor.

    The first thing you should do is invest in some lead glass and machine a nice metal(lead maybe) enclosure with a window in it.

    Some places, such as hospitals and dentist offices being torn apart, are FULL of materials from their X-Ray rooms which you can often have just for the asking or small fees.

    You may even be able to find the lead glass there – but bring a friend. Lead and Lead Glass are extremely heavy.

  • Will Jack says:

    I am still debating whether or not I should make a metal chamber for when I attempt fusion. I may just add steel shielding inside the chamber, along with a borax-water shield.

  • nnx says:

    you should put a tungsten carbide shield around it to reflect the neutrons, except for a small hole, on which you mount a neutron collimator, use some laptop batteries in a backpack as energy supply, now mount your fusor on your shoulder like a strogg-railgun from quake.
    Now you can go to town and dish out neutron-headshots left and right.

  • Khordas says:

    What a bunch of ignorant claptrap and paranoia from a bunch of folks who most likely didn’t even bother to read anything at all about fusors first, or get past the ‘oh shit, it’s nooo cuuu laaaar, run!’.

    This is not a dangerous experiment by any stretch of the imagination, other than the obvious, and so far ignored in this thread, dangers inherent in 15 KV DC voltage at non-negligible currents. This is a project that requires a good working knowledge of high voltage, and that’s its primary danger. In terms of neutron flux, it’s really really hard to get to dangerous levels with this. Higher voltage, really good vacuum in a metal jar, and a few refinements are usually necessary before getting more than a few neutrons. Worst case scenario, assuming he gets thousands of times more neutron flux than the average amateur built fusor, you set a bucket filled with water and borax next to it, and mark the neutron shadow of the bucket with duct tape on the floor so you know where the safe area is. You’ll get some neutron activation in certain materials, but that falls off with the cube of the distance so its pretty limited to the jar and the electrodes.

    K

  • Khordas says:

    @ Stu:

    Apparently ‘Nutjob’ = ‘People smarter than you’

  • Coyt says:

    WooHoo My first hackaday comment!

    I am in a club here at the University of South Florida called X-Labs, and we have a small IEC Fusor. We use it for demos, but hopefully it will fuse some day. The Fusion reaction is not dangerous at these voltages at all. I am 15 years old and I have built power supplies for the thing. I love seeing one in a glass bell jar. The plasma is so much more viewable, it makes me want to use a bell jar. Great post and great design; i love seeing more people do hacks like this!

    http://xlabs.eng.usf.edu/

    @Will Jack, you could try using a Biphase Doubler rectifier for your neon sign transformer, this should give you almost the full -15kv instead of your -9.5kv. The problem with neon sign transformers is that their secondaries are center tapped to the case, so they become hard to fully rectify.

  • Tachikoma says:

    If anyone is interested in fusion devices, have a quick search on “polywell”. Basically the device is based loosely on the electrostatic fusor concept, but it actually uses magnetic confinement. The advantage of the polywell is that you won’t get losses associated with grid heating, as you do with the fusor. The polywell was developed by Bussard, who sadly passed away a couple of years ago.

    Bussard did a presentation at google, you can watch it here:
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1996321846673788606#

    A transcript of the presentation is available here:
    http://wikiwix.com/cache/display.php?url=http://askmar.com/ConferenceNotes/Should%20Google%20Go%20Nuclear.pdf

  • nicco says:

    lol, stu sez “i be ignant”

    coyt, you’re 15? you’re in a club at UofSF? wow, lots of respect for you, but… you know you’re gonna be a virgin for like… ever, right? well maybe not, cuz skolnick and the gang did all right, but still…

  • hawkeye says:

    Coyt and Will Jack – Even though people like stu are voting democrat and busy enslaving us with Government regulations… You are both ahead of the curve, don’t let naysayers get in your way.

    Keep up the excellent work!

  • nave.notnilc says:

    hawkeye++ for trying to turn this into a political nonsense too :P

  • Will Jack says:

    Yeah I have been considering removing the centertap for a while.I am 15 as well, it is glad to know that other people my age are doing this

  • octel says:

    @Stu
    “That renders it more dangerous than an LSD production lab.”

    good troll :)

  • Neil says:

    @ Lee:
    NO tritium for amateurs (USofA)—besides being expensive, getting it requires all kinds of forms filled-out for the gov’t. It is a massive no-no to have it or experiment with it without the training that the gov’t requires. Tritium would be a danger to you and your neighborhood.
    captn

  • Neil says:

    Stu said: “Its clearly non govt-authorised, totally unregulated, possibly under-shielded. Simple.”
    The gov’t doesn’t restrict this type of experimenting—it is, indeed, totally unregulated. Simple.
    the_captn

  • Neil says:

    @ nnx: There’s no advantage to (try to) reflect the neutrons back into the chamber.

    the_captn

  • Marty McFly says:

    Journal of M. McFly
    ——————–

    Doc Brown and I just got back from 2015 where I was totally surprised to learn that Will Jack made the 2014 Darwin Awards. He was named right above the guy who tried to improve the thermodynamic efficiencies in his apartment furnace with the unfortunate side-effect of burning down the whole complex.

    But, all of you should be pleased to know that Doc and I tried to change the time-line so that Will would live, (we made him more concerned with making his mortgage payments) but Will got iced by terrorists when the poor guy tried to sell them some “Helium 3″ he was calling Tritium. I guess those Libyan terrorists knew their isotopes.

    Oh well. Back to the Future for us. I hear you can mod your Mr. Fusion to triple the amount of energy it produces per unit time. There’s a slight possibility of it exploding but I’ll put a couple of layers of lead tape around it. Should take care of any mishaps.

    But if an exploding, falling sky-DeLorean (TM) happens to knock you dead, well, as long as I get to research what I want, where it’s convenient to me, it’s OK.

    Then again, there might be a reason why test-facilities exist… maybe they limit the damage to others when things (radiation, fire) go unexpectedly wrong.

    M. McFly

  • j says:

    Marty, we all know you wouldn’t be back in the future if the time machine was built in a test facility.

  • Will Jack says:

    Marty, your Back to the Future reference is funny, although do your research before commenting, this device is no more dangerous than a neon sign or a plasma ball.

  • Tachikoma says:

    Could someone explain why my comment is “awaiting moderation”?

  • Scott says:

    Deuterium’s actually pretty dang easy to get your hands on. Here’s the easiest source I know of:

    http://unitednuclear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=16_17_69&products_id=135

    $10 for 10 grams of heavy water. Separate the deuterium using electrolysis, just like you probably did in high school chemistry with the regular hydrogen in water.

    Tritium’s not totally unobtainable, either. I have a bit here on my desk, in the form of a sealed glass tube with a phosphor coating. You can get much bigger ones from self-luminous exit signs, but I really wouldn’t suggest messing with that unless you know what you’re doing.

  • Jikki says:

    I’m sure I’m not the first person to mention this, but heavy water is actually naturally occurring, just in small concentrations. It’s also deuterium oxide, not just deuterium. But whatever. A fusion reactor would be sweet. =D

  • Jikki says:

    Tritium would be harder.

  • Cyrozap says:

    Stu == Troll

    Don’t feed the Trolls.

  • octel says:

    This basement fusion reactor is more dangerous than cannabis consumption!

    CALL THE FBI!!!

  • bothersaidpooh says:

    Heh, I am collecting parts to build this thing. Got some strange looks at the garden centre when asking if they had any bell jars for “a vacuum chamber”… lol..

    Yeah, X-rays are dangerous but if you are careful and use safety precautions such as leaded glass and shielding (lead rolls from spare roofing stock work) and dosimeter schedule to determine safe levels you should be fine.
    Also its quite feasible to use low pressure helium to make up for a lousy vacuum (increases electron free path) and makes the whole system a bit safer while still demonstrating many of the effects of a fusor.

    On a side note, if you are feeling creative its quite simple to make a hybrid magnetic fusor using surplus toroidal magnets (or arrays of square magnets from Ebay etc arranged in a funnel shape) to get substantially more ion focussing with moderate high voltage.
    maybe combine the two and use outer basketball shaped grid, intermediate magnetic array and centre electrode.

    another amusing idea is to homogenise the fields by spinning the magnetic cones (have no idea if this would work) and applying field feedback with external magnets to iron out any kinks in the fields to stop those irritating leaks.
    :)

    (shades of “The Time Machine” here…)

    contact me on the high voltage and electronics forums..

  • I don’t know if this has been said already (can’t be bothered reading all the comments) but Deuterium is a non-radioactive isotope of Hydrogen and costs about $150 a bottle from gas suppliers near me… It doesn’t require any licensing or anything to get. Tritium is radioactive and thus a controlled substance, but Deuterium is dead easy to get hold of.

    And for uninformed people like Stu, the radioactive aspects of this are not remotely dangerous – the biggest danger for this guy is that he is doing it in a glass bell-jar, which could have a big risk of shattering at the low pressures required for fusion. Usually fusors are made with metal vacuum parts.

    Then there’s the electrical risk – although they use extremely low current (a few milliamps), fusors generally operate at around -10kV to -40kV (the inner ring is at a negative potential relative to the grid, which is ground).

    All you have to worry about apart from that is a few fast moving neutrons, but home built fusors are so inefficient (compared to, say, industrial ones that are actually used as sources for fast neutron radiation) that you’d have to sit less than a metre away from it while it was operating for a few weeks or months to do any real cell damage…

  • Anonymouse says:

    As far as stresses on the vacuum chamber go, high vacuum is pretty much equivalent to low vacuum. Say the pressure is 1/50 of atmospheric. That’s a pretty crappy vacuum in the physics world, only useful for chemists doing vacuum distillation. However, at that pressure, the stress on the vacuum chamber is 49/50 of what it would be if it (didn’t) contain a perfect vacuum.

  • jonny5 says:

    i love it next start up some dark matter and we will have a episode of fringe

  • ehrichweiss says:

    Give Stu a break, he’s British. No seriously, I’m pretty sure he’s a Brit because of that extra “u” in “neighborhood”, and Britain is called “the Nanny State” for a reason. Perhaps he’s a member of Parliament.

    I figure if we’re gonna get on the nutjobs, AND we’re gonna make it political, then we need to make it cross borders as well..lol.

    Will Jack, excellent work.

  • Khordas says:

    One thing you could do with this design to get some better efficiency would be to make the outer electrode a larger copy of the inner one. Having two different electrode patterns prevents the fusor from operating in ‘star mode’ where the ions that collide with the grids are preferentially removed and the ones remaining are on trajectories that pass through the spaces in the grid. The grid collision losses are one of the big barriers to efficient operation, and anything that can be done to reduce them results in big gains. That’s the (very simplified explanation warning) theory behind the polywell modification as well. Magnets to trap electrons, in order to create virtual electrodes rather than ones requiring wire, so that grid collision losses don’t occur.

    In another vein, if you ever do get a decent neutron flux, lining your chamber (metal chamber only for this) with lithium will result, if I recall correctly, in neutron activation of the lithium to tritium. Basically this would be the breeder reactor configuration. Start it on deuterium, make enough neutrons to start breeding tritium, and then continue to fuse the tritium for more power.

    K

  • tantris says:

    i don’t see any problem with this deuterium fluorescent light, but if i believed for a second that my neighbor was creating a powerful neutron source – and actually able to do it, i would be more than just concerned.
    so why the hostility against stu?

  • americasfuture says:

    i want to see the nuclear accident from this

  • polossatik says:

    @tantris: because it’s then a similar reaction as shouting “bomb” when you see some electronics with wires attached.

  • Khordas says:

    @ tantris

    Because he’s making it clear that he has no idea what the project’s actual dangers are or are not, and is promoting a climate of hostility against hackers and basement research.

    A similar example: not that long ago, police busted a nearby amateur soapmaker, because her neighbors had noticed that she was buying chemicals and had lab supplies. While eventually charges were dropped, it took her a lot of money and a lot of time, she has a police record, her neighbors still treat her as a pariah, she never did get her chemicals and equipment back, and the judge gave her a statement basically saying that the whole thing was her fault, and that no one outside research institutions should have chemicals, make their own products, or do their own research, and that the police and neighbors were entirely right to treat her like a scary person. What a slap in the face to someone who’s doing a process that’s been known and done at home for thousands of years. What a slap in the face to everyone who actually makes things, does things, and thinks.

    When I see someone promoting this sort of bullshit, my blood boils, and I can tell that a lot of the other actual hackers on this board have a similar reaction. Guys like stu can go to hell.

    K

  • Steve says:

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jan/15/students-evacuated-school-chollas-view/

    When people don’t know what they are talking about, they cause a lot of trouble. The very least someone could do before jumping to the conclusion that you are trying to kill everyone is do a little bit of research and be open minded. Not everyone is out to kill you(although they might be if you keep insisting that they are).

  • tantris says:

    @polossatik @khordas: yes, yes, yes
    and i can’t tell you how much i hate this anti-science paranoia. but i don’t think a project that -if it ever worked- would (slightly) irradiate your neighbor’s kids, is the project to cry freedom-to-hack over.

  • Stu Nutzjob says:

    You feed the inspiration of life. You ruin the dreams of many. What political world are you in? This is no longer a time of the “government” ruling the world. You think Communist China is entirely as powerful? They may cover things up but the media captures it all. Soon enough the people will overtake what needs to be overtaken. I won’t speak for many but I can tell you that many of those scientist that flocked to America… did for one reason. Freedom of experiments. They are going to do what they want to do. Try and stop them and you may just have another Hitler Nazi regime coming after you with some way more powerful weapons than firepower… we are talking massive amounts of RadioActive WaveGuns that can instantly fry all brain cells… you are still alive but awfully retarded. Wait, I think my last WRT54G did that to you with 251mW power! LMFAO.

  • poiso says:

    Godwin’ns law

    /end comments

  • Will Jack says:

    @ Tantris,Please read some of the comments before you do, this device currently does NOT produce x-ray or ionizing radiation at the moment. However, when i convert it to a full fusing fusor,it will not output very many neutrons at all (as the farnsworth-hirch type fusor is inherently inefficient) , and those are easily shielded by borax in water, the x-rays that will be produced will be shielded as well. I am not placing myself or others in danger of being irradiated. The greatest danger of this project is electrocution, which I am protected against as well.

  • Infernus says:

    Am i the only one who thinks this thing should be placed inside a bender-bot in honor of farnsworth :D

    Maybe it can be used to give the bender-brew still some nice glowing eyes!!

    In all seriousness, I made about ten of these one year(very little, cost me like 300$ total, all new supplies :p) and noone ever complained… and i hung them on my fething deck.

    Not to diminish from his work AT ALL, this is a remarkable project, but I really want people… to understad that unless he ups the voltage ten, increases the vaccum, AND starts injecting deuterium w/ tritium, we, and the neigbours cat, have nothing to worry about.

  • Scottar says:

    Stu is the same kind of wonko-nuts who think CO2 is causing global warming.

    We have cosmic rays that are constantly bombarding everything and they can travel through the earth.

    There are more dangerous contaminates in the average home then you will ever get from a few neutrons that can only travel a limited distance.

    Stay away from cathode ray tubes Stu, the xray poltergeists might drag you in.

  • Anthony says:

    There is a fusor-like without inner grid, it uses electrostatic and magnetic confinement of plasma.

  • MysticShadow says:

    cool lamp, on the scientific level though I must say you know in order for the proper reaction to take place pressures and temps are not up to specs, but like I said cool lamp, will for sure get you laid!

  • windsweptfungus says:

    Hah! stu is “entitled” to disallow us from learning because a completely different project with a similar name MIGHT be dangerous. LOL

  • Roger says:

    @ Stu, PopularScience Mag gave a 50k scholarship to a high school kid a few yrs ago for building a fusor, currently there are about 65 of these fusors running in the 48 states, IIRC 7 of them built by high school kids. Andrew Seltzman is probably the most noted kid, hes now @ Univ of Wisconsin at Madison working under DR Kulcinski.

    These devices are somewhat common, of course there are those of us who are scared of things they dont understand and they tend to panic due to the lack of understanding.

    @ STU, we’re having having a chuckle at your expense, I hope your feelings arent hurt.

  • Will Jack says:

    @ Roger, Make that 8 built by high school kids, I’m a freshman in high school ;)

  • bothersaidpooh says:

    hmm..

    wonder if anyone has tried building one of these to collide heavier ions than deuterium.
    Sounds like a good starting point for a “Small Hadron Collider” :)

    (disclaimer. IANAP (I am not a physicist)

    at the moment the main sticking point here is the lack of a good vacuum pump.

  • Roger says:

    Right on Will Jack, good for you. Have you seen Andrew Seltzmans website? He has a Flouro cooled grid plus an ion gun, his craftsmanship is excellent.

    http://www.rtftechnologies.org/

  • Chris says:

    This is really interesting to me, im allways trying to find things that are interesting, ive pretty much masterd computers(Gay) and im moveing on to electronics and id love to build one of thease babys

    theres a few things that are ticking over in my brain

    to create 15,000V at , i think i read like 20mA
    How many amps would be drawn from the primary winding? and would it be at 240v??

    How much heat is generated?

    WHat will happen when Deterium in “Injected” into the Core, What kind of reaction will occour??

    im no Physics genius as you can probally see from my questions

    “In another vein, if you ever do get a decent neutron flux, lining your chamber (metal chamber only for this) with lithium will result, if I recall correctly, in neutron activation of the lithium to tritium. Basically this would be the breeder reactor configuration. Start it on deuterium, make enough neutrons to start breeding tritium, and then continue to fuse the tritium for more power. ”

    when u say “and then continue to fuse the tritium for more power”

    do you mean fuseing tritium will result in a higher energy output as Heat???? than deterium

    And anouther idea , are the effects of microwaves or an electron gun known on the plasma???

    chris Ramsay

    P.S Stu if your Denying experiments then you might as well remove yourself from the gene pool.

    Justify your existance!

  • Will Jack says:

    Chris, I highly recommend you visit the forums at fusor.net . You will find lots of help there.

    To do measurable fusion, you generally need 20 kv at the least, full wave rectified, at about 5ma minimum.

    The primaries are generally run at 120 volts, use whatever your transformer is rated for. The current draw changes due to the magnetic shunts on the transformer.

    Generally a fusor will draw less pwer than a microwave.

    *ION* guns can be added to increase output, and I do not know the effects of microwaves on one of these.

    I do not have any experience in breeder reactions, however I do know that tritium is fairly dangerous.

  • Chris says:

    Thanks Will * Goes to fusor.net

    Im greatley interested in this ,,, will have to take a trip back up to Royal derwent, its a abandoned mental hospital dateing back from 1830′s if i remember corectally ,

    theres huge pressure vessels for the hot water boilers so i could make a good chamber out of one :D

  • Chris says:

    i am on the site, My user names Shifteh

  • sunsetter says:

    some one said that tritium is hard to find but i wear a vile around my neck…in glass coated with phospherus pouder and then a layer of plastic:) lol now i just know sum tard is going to be like ” but dude its radio active” first off i know… secondly i also know its only hamful if inhaild or mixed with water and then injested. also ther are alot..alot of radio active material all around…in your house even. some of its gamma and not betta like whats on my neck. but anyway you can get tritium fairly easy… look up betta markers or betta light..or somthing of that nature… lol sorry spelling wasnt my fave in school. but do check out what im saying and you will see what i liked to learn in school

  • sunsetter says:

    btw tritium was in all the exit sighns. they started to remove them …because after ther use was up they had to change the tritium tube.. but sumtimes the glass tube would break and poision the air….and tritium is leagle to have in modest amounts… so is uranium…yah… however i cant speac about enriching it though lol. but you should do reserch about the past and the actual laws:)… dont be nieve..or ignorant hell ever heard of uranium glass.. aka petrolium glass. gues what they put in the glass lmao.. try to buy and finde sume its not that hard ..at all

  • Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Hack a Day serves up fresh hacks each day, every day from around the web as well as hacking related news.

    Send us your hacks






         




    Hacks

    Resources