Self Built Power Meter Uses Dual Sense Transformers

[Renaud] built a AC power meter from scratch. While commercial power meters like the Kill A Watt are available [Renaud’s] build gives an interesting insight into the methods used.

currentAt the heart of [Renaud’s] design lie two sense transformers. The first is a typical voltage stepdown transformer. This brings the AC line voltage down to +/- 10V, which is more amenable to digital sampling. The second is a current sense transformer. In current transformers the primary is typically a single wire (the AC line in this case) passing through the middle of a ring (see the picture to the right from wikipedia). The secondary is wrapped round the ring. When the secondary coil is shorted a current in the primary wire/coil induces a current in the secondary coil.

In practice, the voltage drop across a low value resistor is used to detect the current in the secondary. Clamp meters use this principle to make non-contact current measurements. Other power meters often use hall effect sensors for current measurements. It will be interesting to see how these methods compare when [Renaud] benchmarks this build.

[Renaud] takes the voltage and current readings from these transformers and samples them with a PIC in order to calculate power. As the AC voltage is periodic [Renaud] uses a method similar to Equivalent Time Sampling (ETS) to combine waveforms from multiple cycles and increase the effective sample rate.

Great stuff [Renaud]!

9 thoughts on “Self Built Power Meter Uses Dual Sense Transformers

      1. The article above points out that current transformers will give an incorrect power factor reading (approximately 3% off for the specific devices in that article) unless you account for the phase shift in the CT due to parasitics in the CT. Would be interesting to see if this devices is accurate enough warrant correcting for percent scale inaccuracies, it does at least seem to do proper RMS calculations so it is likely that these last few percent could be the dominant source of error after calibrating the voltage/current readings independently

      2. He can calculate all he wants, but garbage in garbage out. He doesn’t seem to know that it exists as there is no mentioning of it in the article. He made his own transformer i.e. one without even a datasheet.

        If you have a highly non-resistive load such as a large inductor (e.g. motors) or capacitive (e.g. switch mode supply without power factor correction), the error is more than just a few percents. See that example in my previous URL. It can be double digits errors (%). 13.1% in the URL example just because the CT has a 3.3 degrees lead.

        Elm-chan built one with resistive current sensing which will has less phase error.
        http://elm-chan.org/works/heco/report_e.html

      3. BTW the phase shift is frequency dependent, so while you can calibrate it for 50 or 60Hz, if you have significant high frequency harmonics, your result are still inaccurate. e.g. badly designed compact fluorescent light, wallwart etc as they have minimal input filter (due to cost cutting, size limitation) and usually do not have power factor correction.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s