Displaying Images On The Surface Of Bubbles

The image you see above isn’t a simple photograph of our blue marble from thousands of miles above. No, that image is much cooler than a satellite because it’s a projection of the Earth onto a soap film screen. Yes, we can now display images on the surface of bubbles.

Instead of a the soap bubbles you’d normally give a small child, this project uses a mixture of sugar, glycerin, soap, surfactant, water, and milk to produce a film much more resistant to popping than your standard soap bubble. Shining an image through these films doesn’t result in much of an image, so the researchers used ultrasonic speakers to vibrate the film and make it possible to display a picture.

With a small projector, this system makes it possible to display an image on the surface of bubble. Of course, the display area is tiny right now, but the size will most likely increase as the experimentations continue.

You can check out a whole bunch of videos demoing this tech after the break.




13 thoughts on “Displaying Images On The Surface Of Bubbles

      1. It’s all about the texture. That’s what they are talking about when they mention BRDF. Handy explanation -> http://www-modis.bu.edu/brdf/brdfexpl.html

        Essentially, displays are flat, the world mostly isn’t. When something that should be bumpy is displayed flat, we can see the difference and it (among many other things) makes computer displays look fake. Bubbles are also flat, until you blast them with sound. By varying the pitch and shape of the sound, you vary the texture of the bubble surface.

        They have implemented a basic BRDF in the display surface. You can imagine this being developed into a monitor that could display, for instance, a picture of cloth so real you could swear someone sneaked in and upholstered it while you weren’t looking.

  1. I love how everytime somebody comes up with a new display/battery/etc. under applications it goes into EVERYTHING, even if it’d be more than unpractical to do so. (Your iTouch screen has to be redrawn mechanically in case you touch it. Also it will emit high frequencies to drive you slowly insane.)

  2. Seems like they could eventually transition to frequencies outside the hearing range, to avoid that annoying squeal. Maybe they already have and the camera is just picking it up.

    1. Can’t you read? Both in the article and later in the video they show the experimenter with only ultrasonic sound, sound you cannot hear, the start of the video just uses audible sounds to show the effects of waveforms.

      But I guess my post is pointless since you don’t want to read, oh well.

    2. I was wondering about that too. What I thought was that maybe those sounds ARE outside of human hearing, but the sampling on the camera microphone caused aliasing which frequency shifted the ultrasound down to human audible frequencies.

      whatnot: no need to be rude. also, you may notice that later in the video there is no sound at all, so there may still be squealing in the original recording.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.