Hackaday Prize Entry: Self Sustained Low Power Nodes

Consider for a second the Internet of Things. A vast network of connected devices, programmable matter, and wearable electronics can only mean one thing: there’s going to be a ton of batteries. While changing the battery in a smoke detector may seem tolerable, changing the batteries in a thousand sensor nodes is untenable. The solution to this problem is self-contained sensor nodes, and right now the best power source for mobile devices is probably solar.

For his Hackaday Prize entry, [Shantam Raj] is building a self-contained sensor node. It’s a Bluetooth device for the Internet side of this Thing, but the real trick to this device is solar energy harvesting and low power capabilities through optimized firmware.

Basically, this system is a low-power SoC with Bluetooth. The power from this device comes from a small solar cell coupled with a very efficient power supply and some new, interesting supercapacitors from Murata. These supercaps are extremely small, have high storage capacity, low ESR, and fast charging and discharging. The test board (seen in the video below) provides a proof of concept, but this device has a problem: there’s a single ‘sanity check’/power LED on the board that consumes 4 mA. The microcontroller, when running the optimized firmware, only consumes 1 mA. Yes, the LED thrown into the prototype that only serves as an indication the device is on is the biggest power sink in the entire system.

This project is great, and it’s exactly what we’re looking for in The Hackaday Prize. If the Internet of Things ever happens as it was envisioned, we’re going to be buried under a mountain of coin cell lithium batteries. Some sort of energy harvesting scheme is the only way around this, and we’re happy to see someone is working on the problem.

35 thoughts on “Hackaday Prize Entry: Self Sustained Low Power Nodes

  1. pulse the led once every 10 seconds when powered on initially and once an hour or a day after that just to have physical feedback that it is working (at least while debugging).

    1. Never mind I just watched another video from the same person and the device is in low power most of the time and only goes active when the available power reserves collected is enough to make it active for a few seconds. Some interesting chips for sure.

  2. I’ve been looking forward to seeing more energy harvesting of motion/vibrations. A wireless pedometer would be battery-free in my utopia.
    TV remotes, wristwatches, LED keychains, ect…

    Nice job on the solar!

  3. What is that youtube video supposed to show? A blinking light?

    HaD, can you contact entry submitters and ask them to shape up their content a bit before you feature them?

    1. HaD reader(s) (in this case sdfdsfd), could you please test all links in the article (in this case one) before assuming the submitter has no up to shape content prepared?

      Sorry – couldn’t resist ;)

        1. not really confusing just unfamiliar – it’s just properly applied metric units.
          I’d have used 0,022F or as you did 22kµF (ok that last one is just awful!).

          But where did you find MMFD and MFD? I’ve never heard of these deprecated (Wikipedia) units before – please keep those away from me!

  4. If the design consumer consistently very low current and is powered by a small solar cell, why use high end supercaps that put a lot of cost and effort into their ability be be charged and discharged quickly. Seems like a waste to me. Put those caps in a drone or something will utilize the attributes you are paying a premium for. Just my 2 cents but it sounds like the supercaps are in there for more of a buzzword than their being a need for that tech.

    1. Yes, I have seen them in some buildings (i think there are multiple companies making them). Also seen rooms super heated or super cooled because the light was not turned on for a long time and the thermostat died.

  5. Great. I wish to get 1$ everytime when I hear about “10 years lasting IoT device”. And then you need to attach some sensor to this extra-ultra-low-energy marvel…

      1. I think the ultrasonic sensor burns most power, a bit of googling shows me models with huge batteries (3.6V 19Ah). They seem to require close to 1mW of average power. That is still a lot, but you probably care more about the service cost of battery replacement than the battery cost itself.

  6. I never got why people build a super low energy node and then power it from something intermittent as ambient solar, with a reserve of a few day’s worth of energy. What if you leave the building for a few days and there is no light inside and your thermostat gets stuck?

    You can easily make a temperature sensor that will last 10 year on a pair of AA batteries. By that time whatever technology and system was around that node will probably get replaced with something cheaper and better.

      1. It is true lithium has better shelf life. But good quality alkalines can be 5-7 years. Whatever charge is left after this is the manufacturers have different opinions, but I would say we can still count on 50%.
        So you could go for the simple option to have 5-7 years of operation with regular alkaline or go for the much more expensive lithium, depending on the application.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.