Portable Solder Paste Station Prevents Smears With Suction

Applying solder paste to a new custom PCB is always a little nerve-racking. One slip of the hand, and you have a smeared mess to clean up. To make this task a little easier, [Max Scheffler] built the Stencil Fix Portable, a compact self-contained vacuum table to hold your stencil firmly in place and pop it off cleanly every time.

The Stencil Fix V1 used a shop vac for suction, just like another stencil holder we’ve seen. The vacuum can take up precious space, makes the jig a little tricky to move, and bumping the hose can lead to the dreaded smear and colorful language. To get around this [Max] added a brushless drone motor with a 3D printed impeller, with a LiPo battery for power. The speed controller gets its PWM signal from a little RP2040 dev board connected to a potentiometer. [Max] could have used a servo tester, but he found the motor could be a little too responsive and would move the entire unit due to inertia from the impeller. The RP2040 allowed him to add a low pass filter to eliminate the issue. The adjustable speed also means the suction force can be reduced a little for easy alignment of the stencil before locking it down completely.

We love seeing tool projects like these that make future projects a little easier. Fortunately, [Max] made the designs available so you can build your own.

23 thoughts on “Portable Solder Paste Station Prevents Smears With Suction

    1. Typical troll comment, never occurred to you that they used the parts they had on hand and wanted to use. It’s their hobby, you don’t get a say in the “right” way for them to have fun or spend their time or money. If you wanted it done differently then get away from the keyboard, make one yourself and post about it online.

    2. Beginner: Learns the one most popular high-power microcontroller of the day and uses it for everything. We’ve seen this with Basic Stamp, Arduino, ESP32, Pi-Pico… etc…

      Graduate: Realizes they don’t need that power for a simple project, finds the perfect MSP430 or maybe even 555.

      Professional: Is building widgets w/ Microcontroller X all day long. So what if it’s overpowered.. why learn a whole new environment just to save 1/2¢ on a one-off? That makes no sense!

      Know it all: Complains about what someone else used. Builds nothing.

      1. Professional designing real products:
        – Don´t use a microcontroller if you can easily avoid it.
        – Find failure modes and improve robustness
        – Then cost.optimise without loosing robustness

          1. That really depends on which industry you are. The hugh volume consumer products are more sensitive to BOM cost, but for some small quantity products, a reliable solution and ready to use code base and/or tool kits is more important.

        1. Exactly – who gives a sh.. if the chip is over-powered, it’s a few bucks and they’re everywhere, why would you bother even looking around unless you were planning to make a million of them?

    3. It’s the right choice for a one-off prototype type device. Allows you to add things later, maybe an LED to indicate something, a servo to open close a valve, timer for auto shutoff, temperature sensor…

      You got that micro and maybe some python (I’m kinda appalled myself here) and this can be knocked out in minutes rather than hours.

    4. Not everything has to be optimal in terms of cost and resource usage.

      How much does a rp2040 board cost? Very little so it is hardly a waste to use one that you already have in a one off project.

      It is also likely much faster to do, rather than trying to figure out if you can add a low pass filter to the servo tester which might not be the case.

    5. RP2040 costs 1$, so it really is a reasonable solution to replace e.g a bunch of 7400 series TTLs, or a 555, or even an analog passive filter. To think otherwise is like complaining that a steel hammer is overengineered because it requires the services of a coal mine, coke factory, steel mill and a foundry, whereas a rock would do the job.

  1. I thought I understood how SMD stencils work, that’s until I saw that eyeballing some liberal amounts of solder paste, straight from a syringe onto the pads, also produces good results. Is it necessary for a short run in the home lab?

    1. Really depends on what packages you are soldering. For most larger soic smd parts pasting manually is good enough with some potential small touch up with an iron afterwards, for tight pitch stuff with no easy way to get an iron in there like qfn or worse bga then a stencil is probably worth the investment and effort.

      1. I had a go at using solder paste for the first time today: on a 2x2mm LGA-12 accelerometer. I’m glad I had room for tweezers around the chip, as it took three or four attempts to get a reasonable join on all pads. (Main learning point: be more generous with the paste in the first place.)

        Paste was applied by the high-tech method of using the end of a toothpick. I didn’t have a solder stencil made, as it would have cost nearly the same as the small batch of PCBs I’d ordered.

  2. So the stencil alignment is just eyeballed? Seems like a missed opportunity to stick a couple of alignment pins in the stencil part.

    Neat idea though, especially for hobby stuff.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.