Designing a quadcopter brain PCB

When working on his quadcopter project [Matt] decided it would be best to build a robust controller for the device. He had never sent off a PCB design for fabrication, but took the plunge and ended up with a compact and reliable PCB on the first try.

One of the first things that comes to mind when we hear about quadcopter controllers are the feedback sensors. The accelerometers which are used for these projects generally come in a DFN or QFN package. This means there are no legs. Instead the chip has pads on the bottom of the package making it a lot more difficult to solder. [Matt] side-stepped this issue by using an IMU board which already has the sensors in place and offered a 0.1″ SIL pin header to use as an interface. This is simple to roll into the design, along with all of the other connectors for motor control, power, etc. He grabbed a copy of Eagle Lite to do the layout, and used OSH Park to get the boards fabricated. He was surprised that everything worked on the first try. Thanks to his planning it fits inside of a plastic food container where it should be able to ride out most minor crashes with ease.

Comments

  1. Mark says:

    Angry birds, now on quadcopter!

  2. Jeez! I really need to get off my ass/step up my game… I keep seeing projects on here that I’ve been wanting to attempt but wasn’t quite there yet…

    I’ve had quadcopters on the brain for a while now, and based partially on this awesome rcgroups thread I want to design an all-in-one board using the MSP430.

    My thinking is a 2.4GHz transceiver on-board based on the reference design for that TI wireless dev kit, a 3-axis digital gyro from STMicro, and possibly on-board brushless motor control. Still on the fence about that, because it’s a cost/benefit thing; How much smaller/lighter does it make the quad, versus the difference in price between an integrated solution and just some super-cheap brushless ESCs.

    I want to see how tiny a quad I can make…before I move on to platforms large enough to be considered full-fledged UAVs. :3

  3. Le Samourai says:

    What the… is that bird real?

  4. kevin mcguigan says:

    I sure would like to have this controller board. I am using a Hobby King multikopter board and I cannot get it right.

  5. Ren says:

    Supergluing a parrot by the feet to the copter to provide extra lift might be considered cheating in some circles.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 96,742 other followers