Atlas humanoid robot standing on his own

boston-dynamics-atlas-humanoid

Boston Dynamics likes to show off… which is good because we like to see the scary looking robots they come up with. This is Atlas, it’s the culmination of their humanoid robotics research. As part of the unveiling video they include a development process montage which is quite enjoyable to view.

You should remember the feature in October which showed the Robot Ninja Warrior doing the Spider Climb. That was the prototype for Atlas. It was impressive then, but has come a long way since. Atlas is the object of affection for the Darpa Robotics Challenge which seeks to drop a humanoid robot into an environment designed for people and have it perform a gauntlet of tasks. Research teams participating in the challenge are tasked with teaching Atlas how to succeed. Development will happen on a virtual representation of the robot, but to win the challenge you have to succeed with the real deal at the end of the year.

[Thanks Ferdinand via Endandit]

34 thoughts on “Atlas humanoid robot standing on his own

      1. Yeah, no kidding! Petman is by far more terrifying. In fact, the more human-like they make it (like dressing it in camo), the creepier it becomes. And who in the world thought of calling a soldier companion robot Petman, anyhow?

    1. Was just going to make a comment about Hector from the movie Saturn 3.

      A pretty creepy movie, with an odd pairing of Kirk Douglass and Farrah Fawcett.

  1. i find it scary robots like this in this speed we have real terminators or cylon,s.
    how far are we go gif it a gun and use it in war to hunt.

        1. I am under the impression that he’s referring to the unit requiring some form of mobile power source, and intended to express that, to my knowledge, their units rely on tethers for communication and power supply. At the very least, the linked page mentions that the tether carries networking which, to me, implies that, whether or not it is in fact supplying power, this unit does indeed have a tether. And that fact, though it does not remove the possibility of the unit possessing an autonomous power supply, simply allows for the possibility that the power is derived from a more or less generic municipal-type system.

          I’m sorry if I missing something and, if so, would very much appreciate you or someone else kindly curing my ignorance, but is name-calling really necessary?

          1. You’ve still not got it. He wasn’t talking about how it’s currently powered, but rather the research he suspects they are doing to make it stand-alone.

          2. Lol it’s you who haven’t gotten it. His point is that it WILL be power tethered rendering any argument about a battery useless. Whether he is right or not is irrelevant for the sake of this argument.

          3. Yeah. I mean, to clear up any confusion I’m just saying that there’s nothing to my knowledge that necessitates their skunkworking a compact mobile supply, though they of course could be doing just about anything.

          4. Terminator would have been a short film if Arnie came to the end of his extension cord and fell over due to lack of power.
            It’s a good deal more interesting if they are working out how to run these things without a tether, which is what the original point was.

          5. Of course they are researching a mobile power plant, otherwise this would be the pursuit of a known dead end in developing a vehicle in this factor. Research grants can be staggering and aren’t just thrown around.

        2. Fred, You’re the sort of person that drives people away from comment boards. There is 0 reason for you to jump at stithyoshi like that.

          1. OR could it be you, who accuses people of ‘jumping at’ when they point out a silly mistake, that is the one that ruins discussion boards?

            I know, I know, trying to make you think won’t work.

  2. It needs a big Lexan dome to protect it’s sensors, and accordion tubing for dust exclusion from the joints.
    Robbie may have been a more realistic depiction than we at first thought.

  3. All humanoid robots I’ve seen lately remind me of 90’s Discovery channel documentaries. They are for sure a challenge to build, but they all look quite clumsy compared to HONDA ASIMO.

    Call me when they can AT LEAST do this:

    1. clumsy is highly relative,

      asimo is made to be charming, with smooth humanlike motion, it does so very well.
      ATLAS is of an entirely different design, where versatility and range of motion is far more important.

      so it might not look as gracious, but it will be able to reach places and work where asimo never could(not that it is intended to do so, kinda my point)

    2. Yup. It’s all a tradeoff between speed, power, and accuracy. Asimo may be graceful, but it can only lift a couple of pounds using both hands. Atlas can probably tote a chaingun, and unlike 90’s robots, can walk on uneven ground without moving at a snail’s pace or toppling. Considering Atlas is a concept robot for troop support, which is more appropriate?

    3. Asimo expects a clean smooth environment and can’t lift much, and runs through a number of preprogrammed scripts during demos.

      The boston dynamic ones are able to carry stuff and are expected to traverse a varied terrain and react and adapt to an unknown environment.

  4. I was totally thinking skynet the whole time I was watching this. Both amazed and terrifying at the same time.

    1. Or actually the connection between the leg and hip, it has to be movable and carries the hydraulic fluids, so it’s a point where an successful attack will disable it a good bit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s