GimBall Bounces Off Trees And Comes Back For More


We’ve seen a lot of flying robots over the years, and for many of them, intimate contact with a stationary object would be a very, very bad thing. [The Laboratory of Intelligent Systems], at EPFL in Switzerland designed GimBall to not only take impacts in stride, but to actually use them as navigational aids. This is similar to an insect bouncing off an obstacle in nature.

GimBall’s design is a bit of a departure from the norm as well. Contra-rotating airplane propellers provide thrust while countering torque. It appears that the propellers are driven by two separate brushless outrunner motors, which would allow for yaw control via mismatched torque. Directional control is provided by a 4 articulated vanes on the bottom of the craft. Standard RC servos move the vanes. While not as common as quadcopters today, this “tail sitting” design has been around for decades. The Convair XFY “Pogo” is a good example of an early tail sitter design.

What makes GimBall so novel is its exoskeleton. A carbon fiber gimbal encircles the entire craft. Around the gimbal is a geodesic sphere made up of carbon fiber rods and plastic joints. The sphere acts like a shock absorber, allowing GimBall to harmlessly bounce off objects. The gimbal ensures that impacts won’t upset the craft’s attitude. Check out the video after the break to see how these two systems form an impressive shell which completely separates GimBall’s chassis from the outside world. GimBall can actually use its shell to “rotate” around obstacles.

During a recent test, GimBall was unleashed in a forest with only a compass heading as guidance. It was able to travel several hundred meters, bouncing off trees and plants along the way.  [The Laboratory of Intelligent Systems] members hope that GimBall will one day be helpful in unstructured situations, such as searching for victims of building collapses.

[Thanks Jayson!]

22 thoughts on “GimBall Bounces Off Trees And Comes Back For More

  1. Well, for a test it’s OK, but please people, don’t use these kinds of noisy annoying sounding things in the forest if you can avoid it.

    (I think if you try to use them in a city others will point out the annoying aspect in a clwar manner, so that fixes itself ;)

  2. “… helpful in unstructured situations, such as searching for victims of building collapses” — yeeeah, right. Like General Dynamics’ “Big Dog”, a kind of St. Bernhard’s that can search for avalanche victims, no? Rumor has it the Terminator was officially developed to help with the lack of qualified kindergarten personnel.

  3. Oh, this is evil! Imagine annoying drones flying around in a non logical way (just towards a way point as this drone does) and bumping on your head! It can be compared with annoying bugs likes mosquitoes and the like, lol…

  4. I like how every autonomous robot video since the 80’s has been boldly envisioning ‘we hope to use these robots for search and rescue’ as if we’ve used them for search and rescue before. Where’s my jetpack at?

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.