Additive manufacturing techniques like fused deposition modeling, aka 3D printing, are often used for rapid prototyping. Another advantage is that it can create shapes that are too complex to be made with traditional manufacturing like CNC milling. Now, 3D printing has even found its way into particle physics as an international collaboration led by a group from CERN is developing a new plastic scintillator production technique that involves additive manufacturing.
A scintillator is a fluorescent material that can be used for particle detection through the flashes of light created by ionizing radiation. Plastic scintillators can be made by adding luminophores to a transparent polymer such as polystyrene and are usually produced by conventional techniques like injection molding.
For a future upgrade, the ND280 detector of the T2K neutrino oscillation experiment will use about two million cubic-centimeter polystyrene-based scintillator cubes with a total mass of two tons. The assembly of such a detector would be an extremely cumbersome task that is usually achieved by exploiting the workforce of many graduate students. To ease the assembly, the goal is to 3D print a single “super-cube” that is composed of many individual cubes separated by an optical reflector.
As shown in the image above, the researchers have used an FDM printer to successfully produce scintillator cubes with a light yield comparable to commercial plastic scintillators. Next, the scintillator parameters need to be further optimized and the reflector material to optically isolate the individual modules has to be developed.
3D printed plastic scintillators are not completely new. Researchers from Korea have also produced plastic scintillators with a commercial DLP printer. We would like to see this technique developed further until everybody can print their own DIY scintillation detector at home.
7 thoughts on “Towards A 3D-Printed Neutrino Detector”
While printing a single form is far better, why haven’t they built a robot to assemble this stuff? It seems like it would be pretty ideal, doing a single repetitive task a couple million times. I must be missing something.
It’s currently cheaper to use grad student labor than design a robot to do it :P
If it’s simple enough, use undergrads and have them pay for the privilege :-D
Two million cubic cm sounds spectacular, but it is (precisely) 2 cubic meter; a wee bit more than the sitting space most of us experience in a airplane. If the total device weighs two tonnes, the average density is one. Which matches the density of Polystyrene which is 0.96–1.05 g/cm3 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polystyrene). Not to be confused with Polystyrene foam.
“Not to be confused with Polystyrene foam.”
Thanks, I WAS confusing it with foam, and wondered how it could be that heavy, man!
Sounds like some grad students are going to have a hard time finding their internships.
Where’s that guy who wanted to use neutrino detection for underground navigation? Here you go, you can replace 10 tons of water with 2 tons of plastic, much more mobile LOL
Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)