A 3D Printed Magnetic Stirrer For Your DIY Chemistry Projects

When mixing or agitating delicate solutions in the chemistry lab, a magnetic stirrer is often the tool of choice. They’re able to be easily sterilized and cleaned, while maintaining isolation between the mechanical parts and the solutions in question. While they can be purchased off the shelf, [Max Siebenschläfer] whipped up a design that can easily be built at home.

The build consists of a 3D printed base, containing a simple brushed motor. This is hooked up to a motor controller fitted with a simple potentiometer for adjusting the speed of rotation. The motor is then fitted with a small 3D printed spinner containing two magnets. A similar 3D printed part acts as a stirrer, and is fitted with a matching pair of magnets, and dropped into the solution. The magnets in the stirrer are attracted to the ones on the end of the motor, and so when the motor spins, the stirrer spins in the solution, with no physical contact required.

It’s a simple way to build a magnetic stirrer at home without having to shell out big money for a laboratory grade unit. We imagine this could be put to fun use for stirring coffee or cocktails, too – if built with a food-grade spinner. More advanced designs are also possible for the eager home scientist. Video after the break.

20 thoughts on “A 3D Printed Magnetic Stirrer For Your DIY Chemistry Projects

      1. Most commercial grade chemical stirrers are coated in PTFE or some other plastic that specifically does not react to many chemicals. Despite that, I have chewed up a few over time.

        You do not want the magnet material in your reaction. I know that Neodymium magnets will react with a lot of chemicals. I am also guessing they probably aren’t the healthiest materials to consume if you use this for food or brewing.

        I love the DIY aspect of this but the stir bars only cost about $1 each when you buy a set.

        Give me something that performs better or has more features and i am all in.

  1. DIY magnetic stirrers are common in the homebrewing community, used to agitate and drive off CO2 i yeast starters. Often built from computer fans with glued on magnets and a speed controller. I’ve built a few myself.

  2. You can buy teflon covered stirrer magnets very cheaply, so there’s very little worry about the plastic dissolving and contaminating your solution, and little chance of traces of the solution hiding in the printed plastic layers polluting the next solution you stir.

    1. Eh, those super cheap hotplates are pretty crappy. No temp control, relatively low max temp, and generally pretty weak stirrers. But hey, I use my hotplate for “proper” chemistry work. If you want a good one for hobby projects, I’d recommend buying one used.

    2. …and with a scrapped fan, and 1$ worth of magnets, you get it for free?
      Please check what website you are currently visiting…
      54$ is two weeks of food for some families in the 1st luxury world (and in other parts of the world, a years worth of fucking sustenance)

  3. I’ve always wondered if you could just use the coils and (possibly a custom) speed controller of a brushless motor with the rotor removed to just drive something like a stir bar directly.

    1. It would effectively be a 2 pole motor with very low flux density, so the KV constant would be incredibly high. It may require an impractical amount of current to spin the stirrer directly with the necessary force, and would be very inefficient due to the I^2*R resistive losses.

      The use of a proper brushless motor with any number of poles and high flux density gives you a reasonable KV constant to work with, trading voltage for current to achieve the same mechanical power with good enough efficiency. The coupling magnets coupling the motor to the stirrer aren’t converting electricity to kinetic energy so much as just transferring force, just as a physical coupler would do.

    2. the bare stirrer bar has very little inertia, so it has no reason to just turn instead of jumping to one of the magnets…there’s a good reason why even pro gear has a spinny bit inside ;-)

Leave a Reply to Max SiebenschläferCancel reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.