Cheap biquad antenna extends LAN between apartments

[Danilo Larizza] is sharing a network connection between a couple of apartments. They are not far apart, but they are also not right next to each other so a set of external antennas is necessary. He built this 2.4 GHz biquad antenna on the cheap (translated) just to test if it improved the signal before he tried to buy a proper antenna. It turns out to work well enough that this is all that he needs.

The antenna itself is about one meter of thick wire bent into two squares which are 31mm on each side. The coaxial cable going to the router connects to the center portion of this antenna. For a bit better directional reception he added some tin foil as a reflector. Since this is outdoors he used a food storage container for protection (the antenna is mounted to the lid, the body has been removed for this picture). The whole things is perched on a stake in a flower pot with proper line of sight to the other antenna.

We’ve seen a very similar design used for an NRF 24L01+ radio. If you need more details that [Danilo] posted that would be a good project to study.

40 thoughts on “Cheap biquad antenna extends LAN between apartments

      1. It is an odd word. Many others would argue it should be Aluminium, rather than Aluminum. But hey, I could tell what was meant, and spelling isn’t my strong point, so whatever floats your boat.

        1. Most scientific names are those given by the original discoverer and follow that priority. It’s only IUPAC that decided much later that it should be -ium instead of -um so that it would ‘fit’ in with other metals like sodium, potassium &c. Davy the discoverer(A Brit btw) spelled it -um so that’s how it ‘should’ be spelled.

          1. Picking on UIPAC again for another example – should sulfur really be spelt sulphur – as that was the original version of the word? Language is dynamic rather than static, otherwise English as we know it wouldn’t exist.

  1. Cool that it worked out, but after designing and tuning quite a few antennas. It probably works, but if properly tuned up (spec-an/tracking gen) to where the VSWR settled below 2 it would be a kickass antenna. You may be able to cheat using a router with an interface that provides signal strength or RSSI and trim down the quads/stand off. No measured and cut antenna will be optimal off the bat.

  2. I’ve built something similar with a copper clad board, some copper wire, and an RF connector. They work really well in pairs. I considered a more complex Yagi desgin, however these are faster to build with minimal parts to measure.

    1. Wow right over my head that the reason for the article was that this is a quick,cheap way to do it, also there was a HAD article earlier this year about it. Good job Danilo, making simple solutions.

    1. Yeah…the original post is a little ambiguous to start with, and Google Translate isn’t doing the best job either, but I think it was supposed to be one meter of coax cable and a coat hanger’s worth of thick wire, not one meter of coat hanger wire. I can see how someone would get the interpretation rendered above, but as you point out, it doesn’t really add up.

  3. You mean there are still people using 2.4Ghz out there :)
    If you want to narrow your beamwidth you can stack 2 biquads on top of each other.
    The diameter of the wire you use also has an impact on the frequency range and the distance of the termination points impact on the SWR as well as the distance of the element to the back plane. If you want to do something really different you can also use a biquad with rounded elements instead of square ones…
    Like OO instead of

  4. My preferred approach is the good-old circular yagi-uda. In my opinion it is the easiest to manufacture to a high degree of precision, because you only need to find circular things of the right sizes to wrap the wires (or tubes) around. You can also use tape to fine-tune the inner-diameter. I have paint bucket wrapped in duct tape in my closet, for some of the 433 MHz ISM band Yagi-Uda arrays I’ve made.

    1. A tip if you ever decide to build one for 2.4: almost all wifi antennas sit vertically oriented. I built a 40 cm yagi recently and found out that the neighbouring ids dropped to a fraction when I positioned it horizontally. Odd but true.

        1. My electronics education is too old to contribute something useful on this topic … 2.4GHz was experimental military stuff in those days.

          Do you remember/know to what extent that noise contributes on 2.4GHz ? I imagine it doesn’t propagate very far.

  5. Pretty cool and seems to do the job, so that’s what matters the most. I’d personally want to find a way to make it look a little better. It wouldn’t be so bad if it wasn’t for the foil.

    While I do like the DIY route, it’s worth considering that an equivalent (likely better performing) yagi direction antenna can be had for about $5-$10 on eBay. So if all else fails, it’s quite cheap now days to get a decent antenna.

    1. This is exactly the guide we used back then for our AP900+ Quad. We used some 50cm coaxial cable soldered directly to the AP PCB.
      Before we tried a tin can / Pringles antenna unsuccessfully.

  6. The antenna gain would be negated by the long run of coax. At 2.4ghz you lose signal very fast unless you run extremely expensive hardline. Best to place the router/wap/etc as close as possible to the antenna.

  7. I did something similar for my brother, who wanted to share (with permission) his neighbor’s wireless internet. Two pieces of foamcore, cut to form a parabolic curve, which was then covered with alumin[i]um foil. A hole was pierced at the focus of the parabola, and the coaxial dipole antenna of the wireless adapter was inserted. Signal strength increased noticeably on the display.

    Some gain is better than none, but as says, you gotta minimize feedline loss, because most coax doesn’t perform well at 2.4G.

    For those considering longer paths, surplus satellite dishes work well, but you need to replace the feed with your 2.4G biquad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s