Making Music With Tech Stolen From Predator

This is a second generation Manta, a touch-based controller with visual feedback made to use with Max/MSP. The hexagonal size and the patterns seen in the video after the break remind us of the arm-based computers the Predators sport in the movies. Like the previous generation, this controller can tell not only which of the 48 sensor you’re touching, but how much of your finger is touching it. The sky is the limit on extensibility with this type of data, but for now you can just try out the pre-built plugin and see how it goes. New with this rendition of the Manta is the use bi-color LEDs which adds another lay of interaction with the PC to which this is tethered.

If you don’t mind giving up the touch controllers for good old push buttons perhaps this Harmonic Keyboard is right up your alley.[vimeo=]

[via Engadget]

17 thoughts on “Making Music With Tech Stolen From Predator

  1. That is a really nice build. I usually go the capacitive way when building touchscreens, but this time I got a feeling I should try resistive next time.

    Wouldn’t he get more precision by decreasing the width of the contact tracks and increasing the number of them?

  2. @Hackius

    I make them. They are static back-lit touchscreens like this one. The design is similar to this one – I cut the tracks and pads from thick aluminum paper (PCBs work too) but instead of using finger resistance to measure screen touches, I charge tiny capacitors and then measure the discharge when your body enters contact with the conductive pad.

    There is plenty of documentation out there on using AVR’s pins in high-impedance to measure charge variance.

  3. To everyone saying “thats not music” Thats Christopher Jon playing. He plays industrial rock music with his band I, parasite, synths for Android Lust and makes noise music for another band. Forgot the name though.

    Anyway while you might not think so this man has serious synth patching skills; and the sounds can be changed anyway its not like they’re hardwired into the thing

  4. My arse flute is more melodic that this guy “mastering” this “instrument”.

    However if they sell this stuff for 700bucks they make at least 680 margin, because it’s not too complex to set this up with a few QMatrix touchlib AVRs.

  5. The thing about this kind of “data-intensive device” is its inherent compromise:

    The more detailed data you pull from it (say, to make more different nuances in the music), the more skilled the performer has to be.

    If you use the data to really “max out” the capabilities of the device, you make an instrument that may be impossible, or at least impractical, for any performer.

    It’s like, initially speed limits were 5-10 miles per hour; as the equipment got better we were able to push that to (roads considered) pretty close to “safely sub-average” human limits — we need self-driving cars before we can go 150mph everywhere.

    The relation is simply that you can probably use a device like this to require more skill than a human can learn. I think that would be a fascinating study.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.