CES2017: Lulzbot Has The Best Names For Stuff

Lulzbot is the poster child of the RepRap project. Everything they do is big-O Open. At CES, Lulzbot launched the MOARstruder, a tool head with a 1.2mm nozzle diameter. That pushes a lot of plastic out, allowing for faster print times. This is the same nozzle diameter as the largest E3D Volcano, and from the big prints sitting around the booth, the results are similar: you get faster prints at larger layer heights, and the layer lines become a design feature.

Also announced by Lulzbot this week is the release of Cura 2 (Lulzbot edition), a partnership with the Blender Institute to develop a streamlined version of the best Free 3D modeling software available, and a collaboration with Monkeyprint to develop Free Software for resin-based 3D printing.

16 thoughts on “CES2017: Lulzbot Has The Best Names For Stuff

  1. That’s welcome news about Blender. I like Blender a lot but don’t like having to tell people new to 3D modelling and looking for a recommendation, “but it has a big learning curve”. I’ve also found getting the dimensions right for 3D printing to be tricky so this will help.

    1. The learning curve for Blender diminished a LOT about 7 years ago. I don’t know if you remember the 2.4x versions, but they were quite bad. Soon after 2.5 came out, which the Blender history page refers to as the recode, was when I really started to learn Blender. My sons and I took a whole saturday and some example objects to model, and went crazy. By the end of the day we had more than the basics. My vote is that we should all stop saying it has a steep learning curve. It’s not as steep as it used to be.

      Andrew Price has a brand new series on learning Blender from a total beginner perspective. Even though I already know Blender pretty good, I watched some of his videos and I’m thinking it’s easier than ever before to learn.

      1. I started out using Blender in the 2.4x days but only for a short while before the interface changed. I’ll have a look at Andrew’s new series. It’s entirely possible I’ve missed a lot of the new tools that have been added to make it easier to model things.

        1. The biggest changes in ease-of-use have definitely been in how the UI is organized.

          When I started with Blender, the majority of functions (extrude, scale, etc.) were only available as hotkeys, some of which were unintuitive and difficult to remember. Today, pretty much every function is available from a tiered menu, and those menus are sensibly organized so you learn where to find what you’re looking for pretty quick.

    2. I’ve been using Blender for about 10 years, and it has come a LONG way in terms of interface friendliness. Still, it’s not a CAD suite and was never intended to be. Last week I designed a quick coffee mug for myself and it took a while to figure out why Cura was placing a solid cap on top of the cup. Apparently the wireframe modifier does not create manifold geometry and Cura tried to correct it as simply as possible, but the “Make Manifold” tool in Blender patched it up pretty easily.

      Then there’s scaling. Blender’s “Blender units” are sensible enough for art projects where scale is arbitrary anyway.Unfortunately the STL and OBJ exporters assume 1BU=1mm. You could adjust for this by scaling before export or by scaling in your slicer, but it’s an additional layer where a correctly-designed model could be rendered just 1% too big to fit in the whole it was designed for.

      The good news is that Blender has totally reinvented itself before to fit new applications, such as sculpting, simulation, and the game engine. I’d like to see a CAD mode, selected in the same way as Sculpting mode, where the Blender units are replaced with real-world units (default mm), polygon normals are ignored, and tools attempt to enforce manifold geometry at all times. A few new tools for measuring surfacing, mating objects, etc. and you’ve got a great CAD tool for people familiar with Blender but intimidated by actual CAD suites. Blender is tough to get started with, but Solidworks is 100x worse, IMHO.

      1. I may have been bitten by the same thing that happened to your coffee mug. In my case it was holes designed for LEDs that were printed filled in. Drilling them wasn’t a problem. I’ll keep your solution in mind. Thanks.

        1. In Blender’s Preferences, go to Add-Ons and look for “3D Printing Toolkit”. There’s some great simple tools for detecting non-manifold geometry and attempting to repair it.

  2. How is it possible that we’re somehow still in an age where someone can completely overlook a bunch of cool technologies and growth of a company just to comment about the physical appearance of a woman?

  3. That is an impressive mixed bag for so few words. You have faster times, faster prints, and larger heights all at once! I know, people use the meaningless phrases all the time like shorter length (yea, length is a noun, but they mean shorter road or shorter stick or shorter bolt, etc.) and colder temperature (same problem). But you don’t have to apply the idea to everything; it is so vague.

    The first two are “faster printing”, and the last one is, I suspect, meant to mean “taller prints” or “larger prints”.

    And yes, distracted browsing HaD instead of football game :-) So there.

    P.S. I don’t think it is possible to have time go more than a tiny fraction faster than it does now, given the flatness of the space-time around here.

  4. Tore Lund, arduino dude, Steven Gann, and anybody else who feels qualified to publicly criticize the appearance of someone you’ve never even met:

    Here’s a thought. Why don’t you all post pictures of yourselves here, and everyone else will take turns judging various aspect of your body type, grooming, fashion choices, etc. Does that sound like fun and a good use of time to you? Is it possible that some aspect of your appearance might not be camera-ready?

    Look, I tend to cut my fellow nerds a certain amount of slack when it comes to social behavior, because I know how many of us fall somewhere on the autism spectrum.

    But there has to be a line somewhere.

    So here’s the deal: decent human beings do not behave this way towards other human beings.


    We all notice things about each other that we decline to mention because doing so would be hurtful and pointless. It doesn’t matter whether those observations are valid or not; there is no benefit to anyone in sharing them.

    If you didn’t know that before, I’m telling you now. If you persist in this behavior, or continue to defend it, you are a bad person. Not “honest”, not “unfiltered”, bad. You are a bad person who deserves to live and die alone and unloved.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.