Hackaday Comment Policy; We’re cleaning up.

posted Jul 27th 2011 1:01pm by
filed under: news, rants

Sit down for a moment commenters, we need to talk.
Yes, you all knew this post was coming one day. We’ve talked about this topic at length internally, and we have decided that we’re going to clean up our act. For some time, Hack a Day has been growing a reputation as the prime source of extremely negative, vulgar, rude, sexist, and inflammatory comments in the hacking community. We’ve had complaints from readers (yes there are readers that aren’t commenters, thousands of them) and fellow members of the hacking community about this problem for a long time. [Eliot] even mentioned it back in 2009 when a job applicant expressed concern. We’ve nicely tried to steer things to the positive in a variety of ways, from suggesting commenters to be more supportive, jokingly making a troll detector, and simply stating that the comments need to stay “on topic and nice”.

When we see things like these  tweets by [Jeri Ellsworth], we hang our heads in shame.

She’s not the only one. We actually get this quite regularly. As our readership grows, we see it more and more often. We get emails explaining that people have done a hack but don’t really want to post it because the commenters will just tear it apart in an unnecessarily aggressive and negative way. We have actually had people ask us to remove their projects and comments due to uncivil behavior. Constructive criticism is good, but insulting and angry deconstruction isn’t helpful to anyone.

We’re better than that aren’t we? We are fast, agile and fairly unrestricted in our content. We should be at the center of this community, not on the outer edges, reviled by many for the behavior of a few. Hackaday should be the teacher at the front of the classroom, not the kid in the back throwing wadded up paper at the kids in the front.

What we’re doing:
First off, as far as we can foresee, we will never close the comments section of our web site down. Hackaday should be a home for the entire hacking community and as such, you will always be able to settle in and have a reasonable discussion. We do not want to implement any sort of G+ integration or similar, nor do we want to require registration to leave a comment. We will if we absolutely have to, but lets try to avoid that.

Comment sections and forums have often been a place where negative comments can get out of hand. There are many theories for why this happens, but the result is usually the same: rules and moderation. Many sites have already laid down the law and are adhering to their goals of keeping things civil. We realize that we are to blame if our image is this poor, so we are doing something about it.

From this point moving forward, Hackaday comments will be civil. If you are posting an empty in-joke (“where’s the Arduino?”), a declaration of “not a hack”, a racist, sexist, completely off topic, platform-hating, or personally insulting comment, your post will be deleted. This will be at the discretion of whichever Hackaday staff member happens to see your comment first.

Can you criticize Hackaday?
You can’t walk into a business and start screaming about how much they suck without being escorted out immediately.  Same thing applies here.

We are always hard at work trying to find interesting hacks, makes, repairs, tweaks, videos, etc. that appeal to a wide spectrum of readers. We put this web site together for you, as well as 200,000 other individuals.  Not everything will appeal to everybody. That would be impossible. However, if you don’t like a post or project, just skip it – we’ll have another one ready in short order. We will feature projects that appeal to the seasoned EE as well as the complete beginner. We were all beginners at one time, and it would have been great to have something like Hack a Day around back then to show us hacks ranging from simple to advanced.

From time to time however, Hack a Day can be a less than desirable place to hang out, especially for those who are coming here for the first time. We don’t want to chase off young, creative minds. As a community, we should be helping those that are just starting to venture into hacking electronics.

If you have a problem, email us. You’ll probably actually get a response that way too.  My email is Caleb@ and you’re always welcome to email me personally. Again, please be civil (yep, I’ve had my share of death threats).

Grammar/spelling corrections and dead links:
No need to comment, just email us. A message to team@ will suffice, but you will probably get a quicker response by emailing the author directly. We know we have issues – we’re often so excited about a hack that some little goof slips by. Email us and we’ll fix it. Don’t write a 3 paragraph comment about how important the oxford comma is, or how we’re obviously incapable of functioning because we accidentally flubbed a word. We promise we will never intentionally screw up some grammar, spelling, or punctuation.

What you can will do to help:
Be constructive.

Every project here probably has an area that could be improved, or a part that was done inefficiently. Support your fellow hackers by offering your expertise. Explain why something isn’t working, or how you would improve it. Don’t slam them for their shortcomings. Also keep in mind that different people go about things different ways. Poster X didn’t build something the way you did?  Offer an alternative without being insulting. If someone chooses to use their brand new Core i7 monster system to drive a few LEDs, that’s their prerogative. Inside, we all know that it is not the most efficient use of money or technology, there’s no reason to beat that dead horse in public.

You know what else encourages hackers to do more projects? A pat on the back. I talk to people all the time who say that they just don’t have any constructive criticism for the projects, so they don’t comment. Well, that and they know they’ll bring the ire of the worst commenters if they happen to ask a silly question. Drop in and say what you like about a project. Those positive posts might just be enough to encourage that hacker to take it a step further. How many projects have you seen dropped simply because people thought there wasn’t any interest? Tons. If you like a project, let them know.

To encourage this, the writers are going to be keeping an eye on the comments. Randomly, when we see someone being exceptionally helpful, we’ll contact them and send them a prize. This will most likely be in the form of a hackaday sticker, but we’ll see if we can’t find some other fun things as well.

Help us make Hack a Day great. Please.

[Update: we're working on a comment flagging system currently]

[Update: threading and comment reporting have been added]



562 Responses to Hackaday Comment Policy; We’re cleaning up.

  • Alan says:

    As a long time reader and first time poster; I always enjoyed reading the comments due it’s gossipy nature.

    But I guess that’s what Facebook is for…

  • NTM37 says:

    Long time reader, first time commenter;
    One word: finally.

  • kyle says:

    also inb4 overly offensive comments

  • sillyzombie666 says:

    huh really the 3 things i had feature receive negative comments on the videos or instructables, but here there were a few but not many

  • anonymouse says:

    honestly, though, reading the comments on a jeri video is very, very cringeworthy.

  • Monty Werthington says:

    No I have to agree with the staff on this one, the troll face and racists were putting me off. Now to try and enforce this.

  • Will says:

    @kyle – your “free speech” will get deleted, so go ahead, post away :)

    I think it’s about time HaD did this. I’ve had a few projects featured and at least 90% of wha tI got was “that sucks, yous hould have done it like this” or something to that effect. It’s time to get rid of the trolls once and for all.

  • patheticbliss says:

    And if anyone needs an example of the idiocy that is being referred to here, take a look at the first comment! Useless? That’s right! (Unless it gets removed)

    Actually, I’ve seen enough good, useful, interesting comments around here that the stupid, idiotic ones don’t bug me that much. But yeah, an overhaul would be nice.

  • Alex says:

    Sorry but free speech is not relevant here.

  • Wile E. Coyote says:

    I am glad to see that something has been said about this. The comments were really getting out of hand for some time now. I hope that everyone takes this seriously. If the vulgarities recede, I will seriously think about submitting some of my hacks.

  • Jozh says:

    The face is neat :D

  • Jason Coyne says:

    kyle : Everyone is entitled to free speech. You are not entitled to force someone else to publish your speech. Go make your own website/blog. They are free to publish or not publish what they want, without any standards whatsoever. However they should be wary, as by moderating the discussion, they do lose some common carrier protection, and can be held more responsible for what they choose to leave up. Also, good job on posting one aboslutely worthless post like they JUST COMMENTED ABOUT, and one two word post, within minutes of each other.

  • Anonfriend says:

    This is simply a challenge for trolls to be more effective. I’ve always thought trolling should be more elegant. The target should never feel like they are getting trolled. They should wake up in the middle of the night, pained over what that one apparently serious comment said.

  • Job says:

    I’m not sure if I miss something, but altough I’m in favour of deleting trollish comments it won’t prevent trolls from finding the projects of people linked on your website. Which is what seems to be the core of the problem here.

    The only way I can think of that prevents this is to prevent this site from being a portal for those people in the first place. Essentially, you’d have to outright ban those people like it works on (of all places) 4chan.

    Just a thought.

  • doesn't matter says:

    What the hell ?!
    This is the first I have read about this.
    I lurk here about 3 -4 years now I guess but this is the first time I heard about this.
    I even never noticed it but I don’t read the comments.
    I’m a bit dissapointed as this might hold back some articles.
    And against Jeri Ellsworth ???
    I’m a bit ashamed to be called a “hackaday reader” now.
    I thought this was a community where the stupidity was atleast low.

  • fbz says:

    yay! as an ex-had-employee, and a woman, i’m really happy to hear this news! YAY!

  • darkore says:

    What the hell ? Is the average age of people posting projects here less than 10 ? If you can’t extract something constructive from a negative comment, ignore it. If it’s just a pure insult, ignore it. No need to run crying to your mommy about it. Seriously people, grow up already.

  • rand says:

    Long time reader…first time poster… I appreciate your reaction to the need to moderate. I’ve been surprised in the past when I read negative comments… to the point of not reading them as a general rule. Thanks for sharing that I’m not the only one that gets put off.

  • avrpunk says:

    Censorship is worse than the comments. That’s ok, I can just stop visiting this site.

    • Aeros says:

      Sounds good. No one is MAKING you stay.
      Censorship is a bad thing..BUT to a certain point. People that take the freedom of speech to the point of harassing or just being complete idiots for the sake of it are destroying and taking advantage of what that really means.
      But I suppose your not reading this since you are already gone.

  • andres says:

    well i hope this works out. sifting through the trolls to find the interesting comments took alot of the fun out of reading.

  • jgunn says:

    As someone who has posted many times trying to be encouraging and getting people to understand that saying what you want to say but phrasing it in a tactful (if not positive) way will get you a lot further than being negative, and has had it seemingly fall on deaf ears, I support your efforts here.

    It would be great if people could say whatever they want, I’m not a fan of censoring anything, but I’m a bigger fan of encouraging a positive community that attracts a diverse membership, and people acting like jerks goes counter to that.

    It’s been talked about a lot. Things haven’t changed on their own, so the people running the site are taking action. I think this is probably the best that could be done of a situation that people made for themselves.

    There is a huge amount of value to this site and a little bit of comment moderation when other efforts has failed won’t diminish that. I trust the HaD folks to handle that responsibility better than a lot of people out there.

    Keep up the good work guys.

  • slinky says:

    *like*

    @kyle: freedom of the press belongs to those who have a press. You’re certainly free to speak your mind, but from where you are, I can’t really hear your voice without something like hack-a-day in the middle. And if you’re going to use hack-a-day as your voice-transport-mechanism, I guess you have to suck it up now and abide by their rules.

    Go Hack-A-Day!

  • asheets says:

    Quick question — will moderated comments be marked as such (so that the poster will know he/she did something wrong), or will they just disappear?

  • Fortunate says:

    Avid reader, first time poster. I love reading HaD and seeing all of the projects from the most basic to the advanced. The creativeness mixed with the hacker spirit is why I continue to read. I am glad to see HaD attempt to clear out the uneeded/unwanted static and re-focus the discussions to the projects themselves. This is a good move! Thanks HaD Team!

    PS. Hope to see you at DC19!

  • HHH says:

    As a daily reader of HaD, I’m happy you’ve decided to do this. HaD is my favorite place on the internet (in addition to Wikipedia), and I think you’re doing the right thing.

    Thank you for all the things you’re doing.

  • yetihehe says:

    HAD could implement something like youtube. Comments marked as spam are showed as small line “spam” with button and if someone wants to see why it was marked as spam, he can just click a button to show full content. It’s just small simple js script.

    • jiro says:

      Excelent excelent idea. Let the userbase determine what is or isn’t trolling…its much more efficient than HaD self moderating. I think the trolls will quickly be pushed to the frindges when they find the HaD community won’t take it anymore…

  • Jason Coyne says:

    For those who are complaining about censorship : THIS IS NOT CENSORSHIP. You are free to say whatever the hell you want. Somewhere else. Nobody is prohibiting or preventing you from doing anything, except using HAD’s reputation, and google-juice to spew your drivel.

    • steven-x says:

      Maybe trolls can create their own web site “Flame-a-Day” or FAD. And load it up with stupid comments.

      Alkso, those that flee due to the new policy will not be missed. In fact, too bad HAD did not think of this sooner, if that all it takes to get rid of them!

  • David says:

    it’s your site baws, but i have to say… when I see a comment I don’t like. I skip it. In much the same way I do with the articles. Teh intartubes has become full of this cya sort of stuff for the last few years and honestly, just like in real life you have a choice to make. Feed in or ignore it. I guess the thin masks we wear are getting too close to our thin skins..

    Reminds me of a comic I was running a few years back. I think i had around 1000 readers, one of which took the time to create a “flame site” about it after I switched their forum ID to hide every post they made after a few mins. (they were just trying to make money off banner ads in their sig. and I wasn’t the only forum they were doing it in.)

    I linked it, and thanked them for the traffic.

  • Jason Coyne says:

    Unfortunately this new policy will not address Jeri’s issue, as the trolls can still go over to her site and troll away, and I am sure she is getting hammered even now, as the designated whipping girl for HAD’s new policy.

  • Adam says:

    I would like to start by saying: Thank you Hack a Day. I used to avoid the comments section because of the rude, ungrateful few quickly turning my enjoyment of an interesting hack into anger. Sure, some things can always be improved, but those improvements can be pointed out in a civilized manner (as demonstrated by this article). Maybe now i will be able to enjoy Hack a Day in its entirety.

  • slinky says:

    @Caleb & HaD: Have you considered a comment rating system?

  • kyle says:

    Just for everyone’s information:
    My comment (saying “free speech”) and someone else’s (saying “not a hack”) have been deleted. HAD’s sense of humour has officially flatlined.
    I think this post is relevant to the discussion (seriously am I going to have to end every post with that now?).

  • MattQ says:

    Cool, but where’s the ardui-… I’ll stop right there. While I understand that comments can get carried away with being overly aggressive, I think that there is plenty of room on a hacker site for posting criticism. Hopefully comments critical of the post aren’t just torn down for slamming the project as long as they’re constructive in some way. The world doesn’t need another Gizmodo.

  • Mike says:

    I fully support your efforts here, I am a member of a hackerspace in my town and we have discussed this very topic.

  • Jason Coyne says:

    kyle : perhaps it is your sense of humor that needs tuning. Doing EXACTLY what they are complaining about is not ironic, or funny.

  • Doktor Jeep says:

    Who in the world could ever find a reason to troll Jeri? I’ve had my share of arguments, especially over hacks that have some military – and hence political – impact, but trolling Jeri? Why?

    And where is all the sexism and racism coming in from, in comments regarding technological hacks? I must have a habit of not reading them. How does that happen? Someone jailbreaks a cell phone and sexist/racist stuff shows up?

    I don’t get it.

    From a private property perspective, the owners have a right to do with their forums anything they way, as much as they claim responsibility for it. Therefore even if it could be called censorship, they still have the right. If someone thinks their opinion has the right to be on the internet, they have to pay for the bandwidth. Hackaday pays for the bandwidth, so they can do whatever they want with it.

  • default says:

    I have been viewing HaD at least once a day for at least the past 6 months. Never have I had a desire to ask a single question (being new to hacking and starting a BS in EE) about anything due to the horribly negative comments I read daily. I also had no desire to perpetuate the negativity by demeaning the demeanor. I thank you HaD staff for doing right by the community and cleaning house. I will now probably feel comfortable contributing comments to some of the amazing projects that are featured. This is my first comment here ever; hopefully not my last. Thanks again.

  • ss says:

    Hey! Where is the Arduino? :) (KIDDING!) I have to agree with Caleb. I posted in the past a few projects and I was fortunate that it wasn’t killed by mean words and comments, however, I have seen nasty stuff here. I also have to admit that I have posted “lame” or “that’s not a hack” probably twice or 3 times. It may have been out of frustration when HAD has posted something, actually, anything, looking to me as if HAD didn’t have anything else to post “but we need to post”. Not trying to blame it on you guys, but you may have to admit some guilt in the quality of some postings.

    I will continue checking and loving HAD and also promise to contribute with positive feedback (or no feedback). I like this site and the job that Caleb and others do. Go HAD!!! And thanks for bringing this up! :)

  • jc says:

    Slashdot comment moderation levels seem to work well. Have you considered something like that, where users (preferably “respectable” ones) moderate the comments.

  • Brett says:

    Some of the hacks are very dangerous or…unwise, and we rightfully call people on it. For example, all the pneumatic “devices” that involve PVC.

    Many of us feel that hacks posted here should be novel (either in concept, execution, etc) and complain when editors fail there. I agree, because there’s always Instructables and Lifehacker for the inane. Don’t post for the sake of content; you devalue the site, something that good bloggers have known for years.

    Another long-standing pet peeve of the HaD community is using Arduinos for stuff that could have been done with basic discrete circuitry. It’s not the fault of the audience, but exposure to so. many. uC. based. projects.

    Re: Jerri’s comment, it’s not so much that HaD brings more trolls than any other site; it brings a huge audience, period, and with that comes more trolls.

  • Thank you HAD.

    I was nervous once when one of my projects made it on your site.

    http://hackaday.com/2010/02/11/use-an-analog-oscilloscope-to-display-digital-logic/

    And today, after reading your article, I think I have been guilty of posting not possitive comments. I will rethink the way I post something, sometimes just rewording it can make it possitive. ie: why did you not do this vs that? or thats interesting, here is another way as well.

    And your right, people do things differently, this is how we inspire, hacking is not allways creating something new, but experimenting for the purpose of learning.

    Lets look at the first transistor. NOT A HACK, where it the TRIODE TUBE? why do that, just stick a triode in it and call it a day. lol

  • WilliamHenryHarrison says:

    One thing that I’ve noticed being a human being on this planet for as long as I have is that, people who tend to be rude, spiteful, and deconstructive on the internet tend to also be the same in reality, but are just lying to them selfs about being a committed cynic. This wave of cynicism that has infected the internet is to of no one’s best interest and only leads to counter productivity.

    And to those of you who are waving the “Free Speech” flag, I highly encourage you to live in a country like China or Yemen for a month, and then we’ll have a dialoge on the true “restrictions” of civil rights.

  • woutervddn says:

    Honestly I didn’t mind the ‘where’s the arduino’-jokes. It’s just a fact that HaD features a lot of arduino projects. And imho, there is nothing wrong with that.

    I also agree with [slinky] about the comment rating system.. It’s better than removing a comment entirely. (talking about projects you’d like to be open and free while censoring might pull of some people)

    Nevertheless, I agree that something should happen. I’ve seen a lot of decent projects here. And although some didn’t gave me an epiphany or didn’t made it on my ##want##-list, I still enjoyed them. The people who put their time and effort in them deserve some words of encouragement!

  • captnmike says:

    Most of the hacks that show up here are way over my head, but I still enjoy seeing creative people stretch out – it is a sad commentary on our society that the rude trolls are driving good people away – I hope your new policy helps to encourage more people to share their projects with the world.

    Sadly anyone with an online presence needs to develop a bit of a thick skin.

    Good luck

  • adam outler says:

    I always thought the tone of the place was quite condecending…. because there’s a bunch of geniouses and linux programmers who spend alot of time getting their facts straight. I don’t believe anything will change.

    However, I will start commenting that I like things more.

  • Mike says:

    About time :D

    There is no need for the negative comments. If you don’t have anything constructive to say then do one.

  • coaxial says:

    Long time reader, first time commenter, and I wholeheartedly approve! While you’re at it, could you also delete/block the inevitable whining from the safety patrol when a project isn’t completely idiot-proof? Keep up the great site! ;-)

    • J says:

      If I suddenly got the idea to grind a bit of aluminum with a bench grinder, with tons of built up iron oxide all over (of course).. I would thank the guy who took the time to explain the potential injuries of a flash thermite reaction.

      Wait, that’s what I do with every single new guy in the shop.. I still smoke when jumping the car tho’. ;-)

  • DainBramage says:

    Bravo, HaD, bravo.

  • nave.notnilc says:

    perhaps put a little link to this page with the text “Think before you post” or something above the comment box.

    anyway, one of my more favorite discussions of the topic, http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_a_dick

  • BuckUp says:

    Maybe Jeri should take a cue from Becky Stern.
    From the Make blog yesterday http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2011/07/5-4-3-2-1-things-about-becky-stern.html

    “2: Letting YouTube comments get to me: MAKE has a quarter million subscribers on YouTube, and they sure are chatty. Something about YouTube attracts the lowest of the trolls, and the hurtful comments used to get to me. Not anymore! My skin has grown thick and now all I see are Halloween costume suggestions like La Roux or Ron Weasley.”

    Deal with it.

  • Moorbo says:

    While this certainly falls under the category of not a hack it is a welcome post. Though I’m not sure it will solve much since the content off this site will still be trolled. Maybe just making HAD an unwelcome place for trolls will prevent it from being a jumping off point. I guess time will tell. While you’re changing things this might be time to consider a comment rating system where the user can choose to see a chronological or best rated listing of comments. There are certainly comments that are not really useful that wouldn’t be considered trollish. A well intentioned but incorrect post could be pushed down the page that way.

  • MopInc. says:

    Welcomed change, thanks.

  • Toscino says:

    LONG time reader, first time commenter and I just wanted to say that I am behind this 100%. Its unfortunate that it had to come to this and I am sure the decision was difficult, nobody like censoring people. I think this will go a long way in changing the attitude of this place and it should eventually/hopefully spill out in to the sites that Hackaday links to and the community as a whole.

    I think all of the trolls and 12 year olds really discouraged true feedback and discussion.

  • RobZilla says:

    Maybe it’s just me but I though the people who were part of this hobby had bigger stones. We void warranties and tell various service providers to shove it and we can’t take a bit of criticism? It’s the internet folks. I try to be constructive in my posts but I also understand that what we do here can bring out the worst (and the best) in people. Guess i just see it as a necessary evil, or, more appropriately, one we’d all adjusted to.

    Guess it’s just me.

  • SDC says:

    Glad to see this. Yes, the content on Hackaday is always worth checking out, but the comment section had turned into a kind of predictable (or, as mentioned by a previous poster, cringeworthy) joke. Outside of my browser I hear people ragging on ‘those Hackaday people’ pretty often, but hopefully this change will get people back to talking about the projects instead.

  • Steve says:

    I do understand why you think this is necessary. But since i dont like censorship in any way i can not support it.
    I also dont think that i will do much good. since there are quite a lot of “smart” people here they will not need to use offensive language to make something sound condescending or demeaning.

    Its somewhat like u.s. american television bleeping “bad” words. its ridiculous, everbody knows what they meant to say anyway and people find ways to circumnavigate using them while still expressing the same message.

  • LoFrango says:

    As a long time HaD reader I disapprove this, IMO useless comments should be simply ignored, but if the admins feel like this is getting way out of control and want to have some kind of moderation OK, it is their site after all. But simply deleting comments that staff finds offensive is the worse possible way of doing this. Here are a couple options that come to my mind (none ideal):

    1- Like someone else said do something like “Comment marked as spam” instead of just deleting it.

    2- Some sort of comment rating system, either simple like YouTube or complex like Slashdot (however if most of the community is part of the commenters you want to avoid this wont work).

    But if don’t like and want to change the current userbase this will not be easy and can result in loosing a massive amount of users, do it gently and don’t try to force you idea how users should behave upon all the community.

  • The Ideanator says:

    It really is too bad that the commenting necessitates overt moderation such as this, but when a guy I work with (who has things featured here from time to time) goes on about the notorious HaD commenters, its bad. I’m glad something is going to be done about it, also, good luck with this.

  • AllThatJazz says:

    Thanks for making the change. Varying opinions are the fuel of invention, but good manners should span the gamut.

  • Urza9814 says:

    C’mon guys, don’t just delete them outright. I’d HIGHLY prefer you hide them (with an option to view), though I’d accept the “Comment exploded into glittery magic” strategy as well…but flat-out deleting comments damages your reputation to me far more than the comments ever could. It makes you look downright hostile towards your community.

  • cde says:

    I’m not sure if this post is more “We’re disappointed in you son” or “It’s not us, it you”.

  • csc says:

    People who do the projects are crucial. Without them, the site wouldn’t have a purpose.

    People who make the comments are less important. If they add to the conversation, great.

    People who make nasty comments don’t need to be provided a soapbox. They can talk to their mom.

  • BLuRry says:

    I’ve had some things featured here over the years. And I’ve left a few dozen comments. Frankly, I’m glad for this change. It’s not a free speech issue. There are many avenues for posting your own personal thoughts online if you really want to. Start your own bile-fueled blog and for the love of god stick to the topic on posts here. Response to “Not a hack” or “Gee that’s overly-complicated”: Well, apparently the staff of HaD already disagree with you because they posted said article you are trolling about. There are perfectly rationally reasonable and respectful ways to state constructive criticism that they will tolerate, but berating others’ is not a socially tolerable method so find a better one. Especially if you’ve never offered content up to be posted on the site, then you’re just being a turd. My first hack was greeted with a comment of “Gee, must be a slow news day”, and that’s always sat with me.

  • mindstormy says:

    Let the overlly helpful comment trolling for stickers commence!!!!

  • nes says:

    @jc: agree regarding Slashdot. They had this problem licked years ago and probably had their approach all planned out since before they migrated from Usenet :) I think Stackoverflow has a superior model though. That site is a joy to use.

  • Baghdad_boy says:

    Hackaday has a comments section?! OMG I just noticed it now! I’ve never read them before haha :D

    Good work guys. It’s always nice to have a clean and supportive environment :)

  • Charlie says:

    Thank you, HAD. This is the right thing to do.

  • Chris Kraft says:

    Happy to see this. The comments on anything relating to Jeri always made me cringe. She does have a thick skin, shes been dealing with it for years. That is still no excuse for sexist comments.

    I think we can have fair, open, honest debates and comments about ideas and hacks without it having to involve someones sex and commenting on that, when it has nothing to do with the hack, is unhelpful.

  • mowcius says:

    Great to hear something is been done.

    +1 for the keep the post but edit as ‘Comment transformed into pink fluffy unicorns for not following our [house rules]‘.

    Deleting comments outright can cause discussions to make no sense whatsoever.

  • Patrick says:

    Constructive criticism is welcome for sure. But the fucks, shits and “why would you make that fucking shit”s are not needed. You are my number 1 bookmark hackaday. I visit you at least 20 times a day (no joke) and your guides have increased my soldering and electronics knowledge 10 fold. Do what you need to do to remain reputable, I’ll still visit just as much!

  • Chris says:

    Thank goodness. I, for one am sick of the “Not a hack” and other irrelevant comments.

  • DanJ says:

    I’m of some mixed opinion about this change. The trolls are terrible and I completely agree with the HaD sentiment that a critique or feedback about a project is one thing, purely spiteful commentary is another. On the other hand, censorship is a pretty slippery slope. I’ve seen other websites slide right down it as the bar to what constitutes “offensive speech” falls lower and lower over time.

    In my online experience, the best antidote for excessive trolling is for the membership to police itself. And for people to realize what some unhappy person types at the end of an anonymous network connection does not reflect on them, just the author.

    Ultimately though, this is HaD’s website and they get to make the rules. I hope it encourages more interesting projects to be shared and more constructive dialogue to be had.

  • AK_Hacker says:

    i have been a avid everyday reader of HaD since 2007, since that time i have seen a unbelievable amount of negative, demeaning, & rude comments on the site. i have held back on posting my hacks on the forums section due to the fact of all the negative feedback that i have seen throughout my time on the site. this is a place to share, collaborate and further our knowledge. not to tear into a person because theirs skills may not be as good as yours. i am glad that something is being done. there are sites like 4chan for those who want to be obscene, rude and vulgare. not hackaday

  • Aaron E says:

    Good for you guys. I don’t see there being any practical loss here from a little more active comment moderation. I support this 100%. I think it’s pretty easy to breakdown between something that’s constructive and something that isn’t.

  • anonymous says:

    Trolling and negative comments are a big problem but I’m not sure post deletion is the best way to attack it. Has anyone at HaD considered making a point system like reddit so that the community can self moderate and negative comments can be downvoted into not being displayed by default?

  • Jon from NJ says:

    - – I love this website and learned so much from it. The comments have helped me hack more things/get other ideas. I ignore people who talk shit on the internet, because in real life they have no gas in their cars to come beat my ass..lol

  • macegr says:

    I never noticed the comments here getting that far out of hand, certainly not worthy of a rantpost and shaking the banhammer. The worst ones were always deleted quickly, and anyone who has used the internet knows how to roll their eyes and skip to the next comment.

    For those who’ve had projects posted and didn’t like criticism: suck it up. I’ve had projects on here that were mocked, praised, and everything in between. I’ve posted comments on others’ projects within the same range. Most people realize that comments are fairly insignificant, some blogs are even removing them.

    One final point: moderating comments here will do crap-all to change the comments that people make on other sites, after being linked to them from here. Most of your readers are hardcore lurkers and if you happen to have an immature audience, what you do with comments here will have little effect on Jeri Ellsworth’s opinion of the site.

  • Frank says:

    I only read the comments here when I know the article in question is going to attract “controversial” comments.

    I don’t really mind a few “where’s the Arduino” jokes, I can gauge the current attitude of the community by these kind of comments. Not accurately, of course, but if they were completely missing, that would show a different landscape.

  • LoFrango says:

    @DanJ: I agree, no matter how hard you try to moderate comments you will almost certainly not change the community. The only effective way is encourage the community to policy itself, trying to force what you think is right will not result in what you want to.

  • Haku says:

    One major factor aiding the negative comments is that you don’t need to register to post, just provide an email address (real or not) and a username, leaving the only ‘traceable’ thing being the IP address used to post, but proxies & VPN services can hide that.

    I would like to see this site have registered posters so that if you do start being an arse you can expect your posts to be removed and possibly account banned, because I don’t know about anyone else but I love coming here to see new ideas and inventions and discuss them without some child walking in and shouting his mouth off and starting flame wars – this does not help.

    I’ve seen some great discussions in the comments that pick apart the finer points of circuits/ideas without resorting to name calling and come up with better alternatives & ideas, but I’ve also seen people call other people jerks (and worse) just because they posted their (non-inflamatory) opinion or experience with some product/component.

  • Franklyn says:

    The problem with this is that it becomes a slippery slope. Someone could be making a very valid and constructive point but it could come across harshly and get blocked.

    Why not implement a voting system ?. They’ve worked quite well on youtube and other sites that have the same issue. There should be a wordpress plugin for this.

    Let the community to the work for you !. i know I’d definitely downvote crappy “omg its an arduino” posts. Then the post gets hidden and its up to the users whether they want to read it or not.

  • Paul says:

    As someone who has posted a non inspirational comment (1 or 2 times) I feel I should apologize. It’s easy to forget that this is a place for all of us to get together and discuss our latest projects. They don’t have to be the best of the best or the most interesting. They just have to be fun projects that have inspired us.

    I know I have thought of HaD as a place for the most advanced type of hacks, forgetting that it has grown and blossomed into a true hacking and project site. That includes projects from expert level all the way down to beginner level.

    Thanks HaD, for everything!

  • zacdee16 says:

    Come on guys, it’s the internet. It’s open and easily accessed by millions of idiots. Expect some idiotic comments. It doesn’t help that trolling (and it’s entire subculture) has become mainstream, but if you know anything about them then you’ll know that when you start to introduce rules they will work even harder to piss you off because they know that it’s working. And eventually your comments will become so restricted that no one wants to comment with the fear of banishment or the thought of “why bother?”.

  • NatureTM says:

    The sexism, anti-noobism, and sometimes even subtle racism has always been disturbing. I could absolutely do without that. Still, something about this bothers me. It certainly kills the feeling of openness. ie “If you say something bad about HaD, we will delete your comment.” I know it’s your server and you can do what you want, but it sure feels weird to see you say that, HaD. I’ll miss some of the occasionally hilarious off-color comments, and the feeling that I can say what I want. Most of us police ourselves pretty well anyway.

    I hope this fixes everyone’s hurt feelings. I also hope the writers get better at grammar, or there will be a lot of grammar police pulling their hair out.

  • BigEd says:

    This policy is a good idea – stick with it. The bad commenters will go away, and the true community will surface. There are always many more readers than writers, and a vocal minority can give a false idea of what a site is about. This site is about hacking, and about learning, not about in-jokes or trolling.

  • GrimR33fer says:

    I thank the mods of this website for stepping up and positively adjusting they way they provide us information, education, entertainment(some delete’able comments) and most of all, a open source & free resource, this website alone can attest to five children having a interest in taking whats given to then and making a open source better world, you can double that for the adults alone
    My one suggestion is not to hackaday, to wordpress, can we make coments tagged negative blurred? the more negative they are tagged, the more burred they are, if you want to read the negative flagged comments click on the ‘i wanna read this this dont censor me button’ a couple of times.
    To the people who submit these tombed scrolls of work, Please don’t let the -ve touch the +ve, but wiki your Edison’s and graham bells, remember, Sinclair had it right in ’85, in 2000 we got the prius. we should have listened.

  • I would suggest a user rating system like PinkBike.com uses for their photo/video comments.

  • dantheman6012 says:

    Idea for Hack: WRT Powered Hackaday comment troll spamming robot with rocket boots.

    Just kidding. I for one am grateful for the free time I will be gaining now that I don’t have to sift through an onslaught of trolls to read some decent commentary.

  • Addidis says:

    you guys are gonna me moderating a bunch of posts. Perhaps a “report” button and let us lend you a hand with the initial parse ? Or perhaps allow specific people you know to be quality posters who leave good comments the report option. Kind of like how the first time you comment with a name it requires an auth.

  • Phil says:

    The “grow some stones” crowd is missing an important point. This isn’t necessarily about the individual negative comments, but about setting the tone. It’s like having a neighborhood filled with litter and graffiti…sure, you can ignore it, you can look the other way, have a thick skin and say it doesn’t affect you…but it does. It lowers the tone of the entire neighborhood by reinforcing the expectation that this is a place to be littered. Litter begets more litter, graffiti begets more graffiti, and putting on blinders doesn’t make it go away.

    Honest criticism isn’t being banned. Nothing wrong with frank discourse. It’s the trash, the hate and talking-down, the flinging of poo. It wastes all the other readers’ time, provides absolutely nothing of value to the community, and makes contributors question whether they really want to be contributing to such a crowd. I’d rather see more and higher-quality content than bickering over some perceived God-given right to fling poo here.

  • Hartge says:

    As a long time reader and first time poster I am definitely happy HackADay decided to clean this up. I would always expect idiotic comments from people, it’s going to happen, but due to a lot of the crude comments I was seeing I actually just stopped reading the comments altogether. It’s unfortunate to have to stop reading about people bashing the projects posted when for every 20 stupid posts someone would post something constructive. I think it will take some time to truly clean up but at least this is a set in the right direction.

  • ecat says:

    I’d certainly prefer to see a comment rating system.

    Outright censorship is ugly, misleading, open to abuse of both prejudice and ignorance, leaves the site open to claims of abuse, fails to highlight the trouble makers, runs contrary to the ideals of open usage by deliberately suppressing opinion… the list goes on and on and on.

  • tehgringe says:

    On your game, but it can’t be sustained. The resource effort put into policing the comments would be better spent introducing a +/- voting system. TBH you use wordpress so there should be tonnes of 3rd part plugins for such features.

  • George says:

    Hi, very long time reader, rare commenter.

    To all the people who are offended about the comments going on this site: Hi, welcome to the internet; you must be new here.

    The thing that annoys me is the people who always come on and lecture about the lack of PPE and other safety precautions the people in videos use. If they dont want to wear goggles when dealing with pressurised gasses, let them. If they don’t fancy adding emergency stop buttons and protective guards to their homemade tablesaws, let them. Don’t bitch about it. Please.

    • Squirrel says:

      That ‘bitching’ isn’t necessarily directed at the hackers, I think it tends to be directed at all of the little kiddies that don’t know what they’re doing and will do something stupid where the protective equipment might’ve saved them. Granted I am a firm believer in Darwinism, so if you decide to test the sharpness of a table saw with your wrist, be my guest.

  • Pat Burke says:

    I read HaD every single day, its part of the thing that keeps me sane at work. I never comment though, and I usually don’t read the comments because I am just here for the article. However, I am glad to hear that since there were bad things going on, someone is doing something about it. If someone like Jeri Ellsworth does not like this place, then something needs to be done for sure.

  • Panikos says:

    Thanks, its being getting harder and harder to sift through all the negative comments for that golden nugget thats often there.

    I hope this works

  • Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Hack a Day serves up fresh hacks each day, every day from around the web as well as hacking related news.

    Send us your hacks










         




    Hacks

    Resources