Google[x]‘s Project Wing

wing

Autonomous delivery is the way of the future. Soon, flocks of flying hover crafts will glide through the air like acrobatic birds of flight bringing home items to those who need them. Whether those objects be food, or electronics, or clothes, pretty much anything under the weight limit of these devices can be sent to people anywhere nearby.

Now, Google has stepped into the ring saying that they are interested in delivering products to individuals in the next few years through an innovation they are calling Project Wing. It aspires to reduce the friction of moving things around. Google released a video introducing the idea which shows a man calling up a service asking for some food for his dog. Instantly, a small delivery vehicle took off from the ground and flew to the intended destination dropping off a package containing delicious doggy treats.

Google clearly states in the video that this type of system is still years away from a readily available consumer product, but it is the first prototype that the company wants to stand behind. Google has marketed the design pretty well so far, and the musical use of [Norman Greenbaum]‘s classic 1969 rock song ‘Spirit in the Sky’ was an obvious, yet totally awesome addition to the video. We are curious how services similar to this will affect postal delivery jobs in the future, and also what the legal ramifications will be, but all that information will surely be discussed very soon. In the meantime though, Google has released an interest form that will take the names and emails of those who would like to partner with them in an effort to bring autonomous product delivery to the world.

Comments

  1. Bill Jackson says:

    Yes, I am going to develop a project Wing-Hawk, which will attack a wing craft and steal the payload and bring it to me secret abode…

  2. John says:

    Nice concept, pity about the Google bit. I reckon that in the terms and conditions for use, buried away in very small letters, you have to sign over the deeds of your house to them before they agree to deliver.

  3. Sean says:

    Missed an excellent opportunity to call it project X-Wing.

  4. Grady says:

    I’m interested in hearing more about the ‘fiction of moving things around’.

  5. vonskippy says:

    Remember, people aren’t people, corporations are people. So all the laws that protect people don’t apply to you, they apply to the real people (i.e. corporations). So forget about taking a shotgun to any drone that flies over your property.

  6. tz2026 says:

    “Pull!” My 2 cents is to coin the term dronejacking.

    One or two drones in the sky is one thing, rush-hour would need tech comprable if not exceeding self-driving cars. Imagine self-driving trucks that would stop and trust you to take only your package.

    • John says:

      Or instead.. Imagine a truck with a mechanism for extracting your package from all the others, and placing it in an externally opening receptacle, which only opens for you once a suitable ID has been presented.

      So your latest purchase from Big’n’Tall arrives, and you need to enter the 6 digit code that appears on the receipt they emailed you, to get your package. Otherwise, back to the depot it goes to get redelivered tomorrow.

    • Zerker says:

      I’d call it Skyracy

  7. CodeRed says:

    Cool tech, great research, probably find a use for it some day. I don’t think it will ever be practical means of standard delivery. Trucks work really well for that.

  8. Carl says:

    This is old and already exists like you can see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-GXFyzHpv8 for example.

  9. markaeric says:

    I think the real news here is that this has the potential to be significantly more efficient than multi-rotors, at least in terms of distance covered per input energy while also being faster. Granted, this isn’t the first time such an aircraft has been created.

    • Chris C. says:

      Agreed!

      Lowering the package to the ground via a winch, instead of the whole aircraft having to go to ground level, is also clever. It reduces navigation requirements and chance of collision/entanglement. Presumably the line and grapple is designed to be cheap and replaceable, and can be sacrificially released if necessary; which is certainly better than the whole craft being disabled. Plus the craft can stay high enough at all times that noise is a non-issue.

  10. garym53 says:

    “It aspires to reduce the fiction of moving things around.”

    I was interested in that sentence in the sense of was it a typo? or a play on words? Alas it seems as though it was a typo – but I still like it as a play on words, for instance:

    “It aspires to reduce the fiction of moving things around (by drones).”

    • Matt Terndrup says:

      Ah yes, it is supposed to say ‘the friction of moving things around’ with an R, but I like your’s better

    • Mr Name Required says:

      I think the researcher was looking for the word ‘impediment’ (to moving things around) but instead came out with ‘friction’.

      • garym53 says:

        No, it was a direct quote from the video (which said “friction”) which is why I assume it was a typo – I still think it would make a good tagline if they ever start selling them (or service).

        (actually on review I think we have our wires crossed – I see you were probably referring to the line in the video whereas I was referring to the line in the HaD article).

  11. garym53 says:

    Certainly this project has merit for delivery in remote areas of Australia, we already have “The Flying Doctor”, why not “The Flying Grocer”?

    • AussieLauren says:

      We used to call that “Australia Post” actually. Used to be service three times a week but I think they are reducing that to one or two depending just how remote you are,

  12. Hirudinea says:

    Thank God the FAA is protecting America from … fat dogs?

  13. Bill Jackson says:

    Ah yes, the science fiction dream, the fleets of thousands of planes or drones around the cities…all run from a central computer…

  14. surfingtheether says:

    Forget practical just the noise alone will mean this will never happen but it would be nice if google put its weight behind the fight against the FAA who recently make it illegal to get paid for anything having to do with flying a drone without having a license. That includes uploading a video of yourself flying a drone and getting paid by the adds that display on your page.

  15. soopergooman says:

    Looks like a Manta Ray..

  16. dana says:

    I don’t know what anyone’s worried about.

    Knowing Google, it’ll never leave beta and the project will be canceled in 6 months.

  17. echodelta says:

    There was a time when there were no “sky slugs” leaving their trails across the sky.
    We can now look up and not have to see “sky flies” as in …swat…eventually.

  18. JustSo says:

    You’ve got to admire Google, bussing people around the world to play with toys. Who knows, there may be commercial results.
    In the meantime the postal service round here works pretty well, and there’s a wide variety of shops are not far away – and it’s quiet here.
    On a practical point, sheep and cattle stations in the Australial outback can be separated by many hundreds of miles, that’s why they have Flying Doctors, and that’s why they accept the costs of an airplane based service – but for dogfood?

  19. homelessmanatee says:

    i guess this would mean no delivery unless weather conditions are perfect?
    i couldn’t see it flying in high wind or heavy rain. or around power lines.

  20. me says:

    anyone see any similarities with the QuadShot (http://hackaday.com/2011/08/07/vtol-airplane-quadracopter-mashup/)?

  21. What a bad idea IMO. We have had a near miss with a drone and a passenger jet where I live and now Amazon and Google want to join the fray? All so lets find the most energy intensive way to deliver goods shall we. Fly? why stop there, we could eliminate the whole warehousing step by globally delivering goods to your home from the factory by rocket. But you want to be “Environment friendly” so the rocket will have to carry enough fuel to reenter orbit and return to the factory. Forget that we already have the means to ship from the factory to your front door, it’s just not fast as the Google plane. That’s the result of the me generation, me me me.

    • twdarkflame says:

      Actually, Id like an energy comparison done. Flying means you can take nearly a straight line, plus your carrying a lot less mass. I wouldn’t rule out the fact that might compansate for the flight.
      I suspect it might be something along the lines of “not as good as a full truck delivering lots in your straight” but “better then a nearly empty truck going about town”.

      Also, these drones will be much much lower then any passenger aircraft. As long as they dont go near a runway, that wont be a problem.

  22. Kirby says:

    Although the cable deployment idea is interesting, I have to ask how they deal with power lines? Deploying the package on a power line or having it blown into power lines would not be good… unless you would like to “cook” the doggy treats.

    • Mojoe says:

      Make the cable out of an insulator instead of a conductor. Like nylon fishing line…. Then they could employ a sensor so that if a pull were exerted on the line that exceeded the lift of the aircraft, the line could be easily cut or melted like a fuse with a tiny nichrome wire.

  23. John says:

    Nobody has mentioned noise. Living by an airport sucks. With large-scale deployment of delivery drones, everywhere will be an airport all the time. Say goodbye to any hope of uninterrupted peace and quiet ever again.

  24. RoboMonkey says:

    Things like this should first find life as delivery methods to large scale disaster zones. Part of the problem with disaster recovery is getting the right things to the right locations. Deploy these with emergency radios to points of congregation then use those to direct the right resources to the right places.

  25. xavierinnyc says:

    Once upon a time a drone kidnapped myself ;) hopefully skyjack save me http://hackaday.com/2013/12/06/skyjack-a-drone-to-hack-all-drones/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 96,579 other followers