SCiO “Pocket Molecular Scanner” Teardown

Some of you may remember the SCiO, originally a Kickstarter darling back in 2014 that promised people a pocket-sized micro spectrometer. It was claimed to be able to scan and determine the composition of everything from fruits and produce to your own body. The road from successful crowdsourcing to production was uncertain and never free from skepticism regarding the promised capabilities, but the folks at [Sparkfun] obtained a unit and promptly decided to tear it down to see what was inside, and share what they found.

The main feature inside the SCiO is the optical sensor, which consists of a custom-made NIR spectrometer. By analyzing the different wavelengths that reflect off an object, the unit can make judgments about what the object is made of. The SCiO was clearly never built to be disassembled, but [Sparkfun] pulls everything apart and provides some interesting photos of a custom-made optical unit with an array of different sensors, various filters, apertures, and a microlens array.

It’s pretty interesting to see inside the SCiO’s hardware, which unfortunately required destructive disassembly of the unit in question. The basic concept of portable spectroscopy is solid, as shown by projects such as the Farmcorder which is intended to measure plant health, and the DIY USB spectrometer which uses a webcam as the sensor.

12 thoughts on “SCiO “Pocket Molecular Scanner” Teardown

    1. When this was out, i remember digging through some research literature to see. My understanding is that it can be reasonably precise to identify one of few predetermined things, but the moment when many things come into play, the error rate is high.

  1. This illustrates the limitations (and issues) of any first gen device, as well as trying to market something that is a good idea, but just not quite ready to be sold.

    1. Looking at the hardware design, they were probably trying a bit too hard to forcefully marry the electronics into the marketing driven design of the case.
      Putting the lamp and sensor on a fine pitch multilayer rigid-flex board and having to wire-bond the sensor array connections to the rigid part of that board? Looks like a pretty expensive piece to fabricate…

  2. I believe the Scio would have been way more successful if it had allowed for raw access to the data. I would still try to procure one if raw data were available for $300 (+ perhaps some hacking). As it stands the raw spectrum isn’t even available when paying for the 950$ Version “Development Toolkit – SCiO Sensor + Development License” (see https://www.consumerphysics.com/order-scio/)

    Anyway, I recently held off on purchasing a SCiO for teardown because:
    1.
    For those interested in the Scio internals- quite a lot of information could be gleaned from the following documents:
    http://www.systemplus.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/SP17304_SCIO_Spectrometer_Sample_System_Plus_Consulting.pdf
    http://www.systemplus.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/SP17304_SCIO_Spectrometer_Flyer_System_Plus_Consulting.pdf

    2.
    The following devices (which offer raw data output) seem just as interesting for people looking to experiment right away:

    a) 999$ TIDA-00554 DLP (http://www.ti.com/tool/TIDA-00554)

    b) 2499$ Raspberry Pi based Full NeoSpectra Micro Dev Kit (http://www.neospectra.com/shop-products/) and possibly the NeoSpectra Modules

    and perhaps
    c) http://www.solidscanner.com/produkte/solid-scanner-nir-scanner-kunststoffe/

    I am sure there are more I haven’t listed, please post any in the comments.

    -regards

  3. They really need to understand: their target audience wants to dig into things. The marketing seems aimed at soccer moms, but I doubt they’ll get traction there first. Raw data is just a neccessity for the sort of science/tech enthusiast who would want to play with one.

  4. I had pegged this project as a scam and let it drop off my radar. I applaud the company for producing a product. Any differences after that fact are based on reader-conceived unrealistic product expectations. They intended to produce a product for consumer consumption that they would retain full ownership of, and that would utilize user generated data to improve its functionality. The later is where they fell short. No one will spend the time and effort required to provide the quality of data required if there isn’t a short term benefit for them.

    1. yes, literally thousands of useful things, it is just a specialized spectrometer, nothing new, nothing controversial and used every day in a lot of different industries, from farming and food production over medical research to industrial planning and that is just for starters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s