This 3D-Printed Robotic Vacuum Sucks

After you’ve taken a moment to ponder the turn of phrase used in the title, take a look at this scratch-built robotic vacuum created by [theking3737]. The entire body of the vacuum was 3D printed, and all of the internal electronics are off-the-shelf modular components. We can’t say how well it stacks up against the commercial equivalents from iRobot and the like, but it doesn’t look like it would be too hard to build one yourself to find out.

The body of this rather concerned-looking robot was printed on a DMS DP5 printer, which is a neat trick as it only has a build platform of 200 mm x 200 mm. Once all the pieces were printed, a 3D pen was used to “weld” the sections together. The final result looks a bit rough, but should give a bond that’s just as strong as the printed parts themselves.

The robot has four sets of ultrasonic range finders to detect walls and obstacles, though probably not in the positions you would expect. The right side of the robot has two sets of sensors, while the left side only gets one. We aren’t sure the reasoning behind the asymmetrical layout, but presumably the machine prefers making right turns.

Control is provided by an Arduino Mega and the ever-reliable HC-05 Bluetooth module. A companion Android application was written which allows configuring the robot without having to plug into the Arduino every time you want to tweak a setting.

We can’t say we’ve seen that many DIY robotic vacuums here at Hackaday, but we’ve certainly featured our fair share of hacks for the commercially available models.

10 thoughts on “This 3D-Printed Robotic Vacuum Sucks

  1. Nice job, particularly for a school project! Things have changed since I went to school. I think I made a strobe light and a one-transistor power supply back then. I never heard of a 3D-pen until I read this hack. I hope this robot vacuum you’ve made works better than the early version famous brand model I bought a few years ago did. I’d do a credible job of cleaning a room but I’d then have to spend an hour cleaning the dust and hair it sucked up from its innards, only some of which made it into the bin, the rest got jammed into every possible corner of the works. I’d spend more time cleaning it out after each job than I would just pushing an old $50 floor vac around my apartment, and it wouldn’t need to be cleaned out for months or years, if ever. I hear the newer ones are better, but I think I’ll wait until they can clean themselves out and empty their own bins before I’ll buy another one. Or build one of my own, now that I know it can be done.

  2. I think that the next step is to customize the size and shape to fit other uses and create a family of robots based on the same components. For example I’m thinking for a while about a very small footprint that can be taller in the Z axis that can be used in small spaces like bathrooms etc. If you look on some models of iRobot (less popular) and also the relatively new Dyson they are following that trand.

  3. I’d say that the biggest issue of robot vacuums is that most houses have rugs, and so you need a drive train that can handle the height differences. Also, cat hairs tend to stick to rugs, and you need a lot of suction force to clean the rug from cat hairs. Probably a rotating brush or something.

    I have always felt that everyone with a vacuum robot ends up adjusting their house to tailor for the robot’s special needs. But I like to have a rug in my living room, AND I have a cat. Consequently, I’m still vacuuming my house myself.

    1. our Roomba 980 does a phenomenal job keeping up with 2 cats, only need to run once or twice a week. The house is about 2/3 hard floors (with some rugs, but far less than half of hard floor is covered in rugs), 1/3 carpet. We don’t really have to do much in the way of altering our behavior for the roomba in ways that wouldn’t be necessary for regular vacuuming (i.e., don’t leave cat toys / shoes / etc on the floor since they’ll just get in the way).

      It ain’t cheap, but it works.

Leave a Reply to Ren Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.