Emulating OBD-II on the ESP32

It used to be that you could pop the hood and with nothing more than flat head screwdriver, some baling wire, and tongue held at the optimal angle, you could fix anything that ailed your car. But today, for better or for worse, the average automobile is a rolling computer that runs on gasoline and hope (if it even still has a gasoline engine, that is). DIY repairs and maintenance on a modern car is still possible of course, but the home mechanic’s toolbox has needed to evolve with the times. If you want to do anything more advanced than changing a tire, you’ll really want to have the gear to interface with the vehicle’s computer via the OBD-II port.

But for some, even that isn’t enough. [limiter121] recently wrote in to tell us of an interesting project which doesn’t read the OBD-II port in a vehicle, but actually emulates one. Like so many others this hack was born out of necessity, as a way to test an OBD-II project without having to sit out in the driveway all day. It allows you to create fictitious speed and engine RPM values for the OBD-II device or software under test to read, complete with a slick web interface to control the “car”.

So what makes it tick? Surprisingly little, actually. At the most basic level, an ESP32-WROOM-32 is connected up to a SN65HVD230 CAN transceiver chip. You’ll also need a 3.3V power supply, as well as a USB to serial adapter to do the initial programming on the ESP32. From there it’s just a matter of compiling and flashing the code [limiter121] has made available in the GitHub repo.

If you’re wondering if such products don’t already exist on the commercial market, they do. But like so many other niche projects, the price is a bit hard to swallow for the home hacker. Compared to the nearly $300 USD list price of commercial offerings such as the Freematics OBD-II Emulator, building one of these ESP32 based emulators should only cost you around $20.

Unless you’re developing an OBD-II reader, you probably don’t have much use for an OBD-II emulator. But this project could still be useful for anyone who wants to learn more about OBD from the comfort of their couch.

35 thoughts on “Emulating OBD-II on the ESP32

    1. They make that needlessly complicated as relearning a new sensor could easily be something in a test menu in the gauge cluster or infotainment system.

      Maybe make it a jumper wire under the dash if you wish to keep an air gap firewall between the infotainment system and the BCM.

      1. Worst part is that the coding of new TPMS sensors into the memory of the monitoring unit never became internationally standardized before they got more or less mandatory in new automobiles.
        If it was, then you could pick up a TPMS sensor ID reader and monitoring unit “programmer” for chump change.

  1. You could use any USB-CAN-Adapter for that. There are cheap ones from Lawicel and others. Even the Black beagle bone has CAN onboard. All that with SocketCAN support in Linux. So there is no real need for “emulating CAN”.

  2. I wonder what’s needed to develop this thing to the point that connecting it to a car’s OBD-II connector (and disconnecting the ECU) would allow an otherwise-out-of-compliance car to pass a state’s emission test computer? I’m asking for a friend.

    1. First, ask VW lol

      Second, youd have to know the exact test plan used by the state, which wouldnt be that hard in theory but I would assume theyre designed to go haywire at the slightest out of bounds repsonse

    2. The state emission tests often involve using the OBD-II port, so you’d need to work around that. Couple options:
      -> Wire in another port somewhere else (say, in the engine compartment away from the exhaust system. This is appealing, but (without knowing much about CAN) you’d have to prevent the signals from the original computer from reaching the tester, but still have it drive the car. Honestly, the easiest way is probably to MiTM the stock OBD-II port and alter readings as needed.
      -> Reflash the original controller. Already commonly done. Alter values for daily driving, reset to stock when being tested, reflash to alternates for driving once you leave and continue polluting harder or whatever you’re doing.
      -> If you want to *really* party, replace & emulate the stock MCU when in the shop, then have a hidden switch (or whatever control scheme you like) to flip it back to your configuration.

      This is, however, fully playing with fire. Last I heard, there’s a surprising amount of interplay between safety systems and the (“main”) MCU; hopefully that’s been separated out a bit. Sure would be a shame if my Prius’s airbags failed to deploy because the main MCU was spinlocked with the virtual gas pedal floored. (I forget the details about the Prius thing).

      All that said, I wouldn’t be bothering with emissions tests – that’s low on my priorities list. I’d be more concerned with physically isolating the systems running my engine and safety equipment from the wider Internet. There have been demonstrated vulnerabilities (with Daimler-Chrysler vehicles, but I have no doubt they exist elsewhere) allowing someone to go through the cellular modem, through the entertainment system, and then screw with brakes, power steering, throttle, etc. That shit is terrifying. Phuck that, I’ll be more than happy to run the extra cabling myself and isolate the network-accessible portion of my car from the part that keeps me from dying. That’s where the above ideas would be relevant – I’d be interested in dropping a good (looking at you, Daimler-Chrysler) hardware CAN firewall in place. I’ll install my system updates with a thumb drive and a USB port, not “hey look it’s all magically updated! Hopefully nobody broke through the security!”.

      That said, I lack the skills to not wreck my car in doing so and the skills to get the MCU to not whine and moan (and probably disable the car) when it realizes it can’t access the climate control or the cellular modem. So I’ll probably end up just disconnecting/grounding/Farday cage’ing the cellular antenna and calling it a day. If I’m feeling really fancy, I’ll ground it through a transistor so I can flip a switch in the cap and forcibly disconnect/reconnect to the network.

  3. I can see big benefits in implementing OBD for old vehicules (I own a VW combi).
    I think about obd hud display, or trackers with obd that does not cost a lot compared to the time required to make them.
    Moreover, in France, you must bring your vehicule to control it every two years. The controls are becoming more complex and
    some new check points are rely onto OBD connexion, so have one could speed up the control process ;)
    For me its a very interesting project, and I am going to explore it: thanks HaD !

    1. Well “Bad Angel” are you implying that having a fake OBD connector on your car that gives acceptable readings to the authorities will speed up the testing process? That they will be happy to have something to plug into and not even bother to find out if your car is supposed to have one?
      B^)

  4. this makes a great ODB sniffer too, since it can be used to possibly extract proprietary tools OBD commands and work on documenting the manufacturer specific odb commands.

  5. “If you’re wondering if such products don’t already exist on the commercial market, they do. But like so many other niche projects, the price is a bit hard to swallow for the home hacker.”

    Considering most ODB tools are basically micro-controllers with some secret sauce firmware, yes I can understand. Hence the clone market.

  6. If you have one of those trackers that plug into your OBD2 port for all of your vehicles except for the one that’s too old to have the port, I imagine something like this would allow you to add tracking when the company that makes the tracker refuses to allow it (I suggested a simple adapter that would feed switched 12v power to the tracker for the sole purpose of tracking – not any of the other functions that would require an actual OBD2 port – but Automatic was not interested).

    1. While some of the comments have been about integrating a device like this into a pre-OBD car, the developer’s initial intent is that this would not be installed in a vehicle but instead running on your bench with a regulated power supply.

      1. Yeah, this is more a learning tool is what I gleaned.

        I scored a Mercedes Benz deck and CD changer (looks like Alpine) from a Goodwill Store for $4 each that looks like came out of an S Class of some sort. Yeah, $4 each.

        Well… there is some sort of proprietary fiber optic cable that like I am thinking some are thinking… that have to find some sort of COTS adapter or device.

        Nope… not much that I found other than like the Mercedes Benz customer service noted I have to subscribe to some application to get the schematics or figure out the protocol via sniffing out the digital packets and maybe for like wireless devices the analog carrier. I might just tear down the deck to get to the part of the circuit that translates the analog or maybe linear pulse modulated or whatever the digital version is to the fiber optic cable. I have a better deck I want to use already anyhow. Then I can just not have to buy anything for an adapter.

        Back to OBD… since the vehicle OBD is wired from my understanding… there is a market already with these devices. Same goes with CAN adapters. Arduino I want to say even has a CAN interface board or CAN bus shield or module.

        No need for wireshark on this type system… or maybe there is a wireless version I’m not aware of. An oscilloscope should be able to read signals and really a logic analyzer will be the way to go and interestingly I just opened a packet in the mail today for an “RCA Audio Noise Filter Suppressor Ground Loop Isolator for Car and Home Stereo”. Not sure what the OBD noise range is. I bought the filter for a VLF receiver… still… for ~$7 isn’t a bad deal and really you can read how they’re made and salvage parts. Think like a crossover coil for a speaker box… what frequencies do you want to cut out or attenuate?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s