Acoustic Lenses Show Sound Can Be Focused Like Light

Acoustic lenses are remarkable devices that just got cooler. A recent presentation at SIGGRAPH 2019 showed that with the help of 3D printing, it is possible to build the acoustic equivalent of optical devices. That is to say, configurations that redirect or focus sound waves. One fascinating demonstration worked like an acoustic prism, able to send different notes from a simple melody in different directions. Another was a device that dynamically varied the distance between two lenses in order to focus sound onto a moving target. In both cases, the sounds originate from an ordinary speaker and are shaped by passing through the acoustic lens or lenses, which are entirely passive devices.

Researchers from the University of Sussex used 3D printing for a modular approach to acoustic lens design. 16 different pre-printed “bricks” (shown here) can be assembled in various combinations to get different results. There are limitations, however. The demonstration lenses only work in a narrow bandwidth, meaning that the sound they work with is limited to about an octave at best. That’s enough for a simple melody, but not nearly enough to cover a human’s full audible range. Download the PDF for a quick read about the details, it’s only two pages but loaded with enough to whet your appetite to know more.

Directional sound can be done in other ways as well, such as using an array of ultrasonic emitters to create a coherent beam of sound. Ultrasonic emitters can even levitate lightweight objects. Ain’t sound neat?

27 thoughts on “Acoustic Lenses Show Sound Can Be Focused Like Light

  1. Refraction requires a change in the impedance of the medium, and it’s frequency dependent. In order to get a wider bandwidth, they need to change the impedance much more abruptly, but that leads to reflections rather than passing the sound through.

    Same thing for light. Lenses for visible light operate over a very narrow band of the electromagnetic spectrum – a more “universal” lens would simply block light.

    1. You’re joking, right?
      There are at least six different ways: 1) The obvious parabolic dish or horn, 2) phased array, 3) simple dielectric lens, 4) metamaterial aka metal sheets and styrofoam lens, 5) zone plate and 6) a Rotman lens.

    2. there is, its not much diferent to the setup either. The setup I saw years ago (and i mean years as in using modems to connect to the internet) :)
      Basicly it was a polystyrene stack with specially shaped aluminium foil seperators.

    3. Can I get .stl files somewhere and try this myself? I have not come up with an application yet, but I just thought it would be interesting to try an acoustic prism or something from this research.

        1. No need for all that heavy non-steerable concrete nonsense. A modest array of microphones could do the task very easily nowadays. They already are in place for monitoring nuclear testing, and underwater for submarine detection (e.g., the SOSUS arrays).

        2. As Paul said, you dont need any mirrors, you can just use microphone arrays. The issue is that sound travels pretty slowly, and it gets attenuated pretty quickly, roughly -6db per doubling of distance. Assuming the sound of a jet engine is 140dbspl at 1m, it only takes about 10km to get to the level of normal conversation (60dbspl at 1m). Now, according to wiki, a very calm room is about 30dbspl (1m), which would take 320km. Maybe you have a microphone that would reasonably be able to pick this up, and maybe it wouldn’t be completely swamped by every other noise in between you and the jet, but then consider that it would take >16 minutes for you to hear it at 320km. In those 16 minutes, your stealth aircraft has been travelling at 570mph (747 speed) and is now only 75km away.

  2. Looks like this could lead to applications in controlling aircraft noise by using specially constructed materials to direct jet engine sound away from the ground and the passenger cabin.

  3. Can I get .stl files somewhere and try this myself? I have not come up with an application yet, but I just thought it would be interesting to try an acoustic prism or something from this research.

  4. If you read the paper, this work is done in the 7th octave, which is at least 3khz. In their other paper it says 6khz, which is more likely (using harmonics). It’s hardly a feat to make a beamy pattern at this frequency range, all loudspeakers do this naturally. This will also never work at lower frequencies unless the source and lens are scaled larger with wavelength, at which point it is rather impractical.

    This is really a disappointment in the tech press, and the authors should tone down the hype. There is no surprise it didn’t appear in a peer reviewed journal.

Leave a Reply to David Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.