Cottonization: Making Hemp And Flax Fibers Into The Better Cotton

These days it’s hard to imagine that fabrics were ever made out of anything other than cotton or synthetic fibers, yet it wasn’t too long ago that hemp and flax-based fabrics — linen — were the rule rather than the exception. Cotton production has for centuries had the major disadvantages of requiring a lot of water and pesticides, and harvesting the cotton was very labor-intensive, making cotton rather expensive. In order to make separating the cotton fibers from the seed easier, improved versions of the cotton gin (‘cotton engine’) were developed, with the 19th century’s industrial revolution enabling a fully automated version.

What makes cotton attractive is the ease of processing these fibers, which are part of the seed pod. These fibers are 25 mm – 60 mm long, 12 μm – 45 μm fine fibers that can be pulled off the seeds and spun into yarn or whatever else is needed for the final product, much like wool. Hemp and flax fibers, in contrast, are extracted from the plant stem in the form of bast fibers. Rather than being pure cellulose, these fibers are mostly a mixture of cellulose, lignin, hemicellulose and pectin, which provide the plant with rigidity, but also makes these fibers coarse and stiff.

The main purpose of cottonization is to remove as much of these non-cellulosic components as possible, leaving mostly pure cellulose fibers that not only match the handleability of cotton fibers, but are also generally more durable. Yet cottonization used to be a long and tedious process, which made bast fiber-based textiles expensive. Fortunately, the steam explosion cottonization method that we’ll be looking at here may be one of the methods by which the market will be blown open for these green and durable fibers.

King Cotton?

Fluffy cotton puffs (by Kimberly Vardeman CC-BY-SA 3.0)

Cotton is somewhat unique in that the plants have always been present in the Old and New World, where civilizations began first using them for fabric many thousands of years ago.  Gossypium barbadense was the cotton species domesticated for this purpose in America, and Gossypium herbaceum in Africa and India. Cotton fabric samples have been found in archeological digs dating back to 6,000 BCE in what is now Peru, and 5,000 BCE in the Kingdom of Kush (today’s Sudan) as well as in Mehrgarh, located in what is Pakistan today.

Although cotton was much prized, it didn’t become a commodity in Europe until the trade with the Arabic world began, which is also where the English name and that in other European languages comes from: قطن (qutn or qutun). By the time of the Renaissance, this European appetite for cotton led to a rapid increase in imports via the newly opened sea trade, and ultimately to the rise of an 18th century upstart nation called ‘the United States of America’  that would dominate the cotton market during the 19th century.

The enormity of the global cotton market would lead to massive economic consequences in Europe when the US Civil War began and disrupted cotton exports for years, although the ‘King Cotton‘ strategy that the Confederate South leaned on ultimately backfired, when rather than assist the Confederates with weapons, the European nations instead went elsewhere for their cotton, such as Egypt, Brazil and India. After the US Civil War in 1865, cotton production in the US would resume, though not at the same levels as previously.

Flax, hemp, and other bast fibers continued to be used even during the heyday of cheap cotton, until the 20th century saw widespread bans of the hemp plant Cannabis sativa, because of a cannabinoid called tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). THC (in its Delta-9 form) is one of three cannabinoids that are classified as psychotropic substances by the UN. Although THC is only significantly present in some cultivars, these bans impacted industrial hemp as well, and to this day heavily restricts the growing of hemp for fibers, oil, and more. Many nations only resumed growing hemp in the 1990s.

Today, China dominates global production of hemp, and France is the largest producer in Europe. Concerns over the water and pesticide usage involved with cotton production are gradually increasing the need for a cheap way to use bast fibers from hemp and other plants that have a significantly lower environmental footprint.

Explosions And Ashes

Flax stem cross-sectionLegend: pith protoxylem xylem II phloem I Sclerenchyma (bast fibre) cortex epidermis
Flax stem cross-section:
1. pith
2. protoxylem
3. xylem II
4. phloem I
5. Sclerenchyma (bast fibre)
6. cortex
7. epidermis

The stem of hemp, flax and similar plants consists of a number of structures, each possessing properties that combine to provide the plant with the ability to transport water and nutrients, as well as the rigidity to stay upright. This stability is a function of the sclerenchyma, the layer, marked as 5 in the image, that we’re interested in when we want to extract fibers for use in textiles and more. To get at the bast fiber, cellulose must be separated from the other plant constituents with as little extra effort as possible.

The traditional way to separate these bast fibers from the rest of the stem is using a process called retting. During this process the already cut stem is exposed to moisture and micro-organisms that swell up and degrade much of the internal structure. After drying, the now brittle stems are broken, followed by separation of the woody fragments (shives) and mostly intact fibers.

In a 2017 paper by Thibaud Sauvageon and colleagues in Textile Research Journal titled Toward the cottonization of hemp fibers by steam explosion: Defibration and morphological characterization,  and a 2020 paper by Maria Moussa et al. in Industrial Crops and Products titled Toward the cottonization of hemp fibers by steam explosion. Flame-retardant fibers, steam explosion (SE) is presented as a viable route to large-scale commercialization, with SE also increasing the thermal stability of the resulting hemp fiber.

A 2023 review paper by K. Palanikumar et al. titled Targeted Pre-Treatment of Hemp Fibers and the Effect on Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites in the journal Fibers compares the different bast fiber treatments. These include mechanical, chemical and thermal means, with SE providing the best balance between resulting fiber quality, economics and process complexity. Retting and mechanical separation is imprecise and can lead to significant defects in the produced fibers, while chemical treatments that remove the non-cellulosic components do work, but require the use of strong chemicals like alkali or sodium sulfate that produce undesirable waste products which require further processing before disposal.

Chemical composition of (A) hemp fiber raw material in wt.% and the chemical composition after wet oxidation and hydrothermal treatment, (B) steam-exploded hemp fibers (with and without impregnation) and untreated fibers in wt.%.
Chemical composition of (A) hemp fiber raw material in wt.% and the chemical composition after wet oxidation and hydrothermal treatment, (B) steam-exploded hemp fibers (with and without impregnation) and untreated fibers in wt.%.

Steam explosion treatment of bast fibers requires as input only a source of power and high-pressure equipment: the material is first impregnated with water before being loaded into the SE vessel where it is heated to nearly 200 °C for a few minutes. Following this the pressure in the vessel is suddenly dropped, causing a steam explosion within the saturated fibers. The resulting separated fibers can then be separated and dried before further processing.

A big advantage of this approach is that it uses relatively little water, no harsh chemicals or expensive enzymes, produces high-quality fibers of lengths that are comparable to cotton fibers, and lends itself well to scaling up to industrial levels with modest equipment and consumable requirements. The current trend in the industry would seem to suggest that this is the approach that we’re likely to see pursued in the future, and which may make cottonized hemp and flax fibers serious competition for the cotton industry for the first time since the 19th century.

But There’s More

Although the sturdy nature of plants like hemp, their fast growing rate and their modest water demands should already make them favorites, another convenient feature of hemp is that it can grow on even on heavily contaminated soils, with no significant impact on growing rate, plant height or quality of the fibers, providing a valuable phytoremediation service for e.g. former mining sites, or arsenic-laced former cotton fields. Although this sounds like it may render the plant matter too contaminated for use, the metals do not become part of the fiber or seeds.

A recent study by Rabab Husain and colleagues (PLoS One, 2019) investigated the response of Cannabis sativa L. to being grown in soil obtained from heavily contaminated former coal mines in Pennsylvania. They found that the heavy metals absorbed by the plants collected in the leaves, with nickel, lead and cadmium being most prevalent in the samples examined, while arsenic and mercury in the soil didn’t get absorbed in significant amounts. This makes growing hemp on these soils an attractive option, along with other hyperaccumulators that can take care of arsenic, without compromising hemp grown in this soils for textile production.

Will we truly say farewell to cotton before long? That’s still very much an open question, but with these recent advances in processing bast fibers, it would seem at least reasonable to state that King Cotton’s reign at the very least is facing tumultuous seas ahead.

If you’re feeling adventurous and wish to experiment with steam explosion treatment yourself, you can give something like a popcorn cannon a try. Although these devices are mostly used for explosive food preparation, they could be convinced to ‘pop’ some bast fibers as well, if one were so inclined.

15 thoughts on “Cottonization: Making Hemp And Flax Fibers Into The Better Cotton

    1. I was wondering that too, I have some bamboo running shorts and they’re quite nice. Apparently it isn’t entirely different to traditional cotton processing:

      “1. The bamboo culms are split mechanically followed by rasping off the woody part.
      2. The crushed bamboo strands are treated with enzymes to separate the fibrous materials from the remaining culm-parts.
      3. Individual fibers are then combed out.
      4. Fibers are then spun into yarns.”

      Prospect of bamboo as a renewable textile fiber, historical overview, labeling, controversies and regulation:

    2. Water use of cotton? It depends where you live and how much incentive there is for water efficiency. In Australia, water is often the constraint, and growers will grow whatever gives the best value for the available water. Our water efficiency with cotton far exceeds many other countries, especially countries with quotas or subsidies.
      Chemicals? Cotton is an order of magnitude better than it was 25 years ago.
      Hemp is a great product for fibre. There are agronomic conditions where it’s unsuitable though cotton is viable. And there are places people should look seriously at hemp. Either way, it’s great to see progress making better use of renewable resources and reducing chemical impacts.

      I’ve heard varying stories on bamboo. It seems some are quite chemical-intensive but not all?

    3. Bamboo fibers can be processed just as wood fibers can be dissolved and spun into rayon fibers, making a viscose fiber. That is what is (mostly) marketed as “bamboo fiber”, but the process is usually not “green”.
      Some bamboo is processed keeping the fibers intact.
      (From reading the paper [Shoe] linked to above.)

    4. It’s a rayon. In fact a few years back if you called something bamboo you had to show certification it was from bamboo because it could easily be of any cellulose source.

  1. My “linens” being actual linen, I probably touch less synthetic fabrics on average than I do linen. That it is odd for anyone to imagine anything but cotton and synthetics seems strange to me. Especially with the existence of silk. I wouldn’t normally think of hemp as being as good as cotton or linen for clothes, but for other use of fabric these methods seem neat. Linen’s pretty strong especially when wet, but hemp can make stronger things though it’s not as soft, at least normally.

  2. My favorite Jiujitsu Gi is made from hemp. It is more durable, smells better after a workout, and dries faster. Love hemp, wish all my clothing was made from it. Unfortunately, it is expensive at the moment.

  3. I wonder how well this’ll work with milkweed & the nettles? Both of those are themselves viable sources of bast fibers, and each with slightly different traits than hemp, flax, OR cotton. And milkweed is vital habitat for Monarch butterflies.

    1. Perhaps simply allowing these to pollinators to exist in the hemp field and enter the production chain would be enough. Could help with the monoculture field ecology. Not sure if the industry would price these out if they’re making some material that needs a certain tensile strength.

  4. I want to ware something that works like a bimetal strip in the thermostat something
    that expand with warm and contracts when cold and a shirt that stays cool in the summer and stiffens up a little to trap heat in the winter….

  5. I grow hemp, fiber hemp to be specific. Hemp fiber, the Cliff Notes version:
    Hemp stems have two parts: hurd, the woody part on the inside used to make hempcrete, hemp wood, etc. and bast which is on the outside used to make paper, textiles, plastic etc.

    Traditionally hemp was left in the field to ret, where it begins to breakdown. *If* the temperature and humidity are right. The thing to remember is that there are four compounds to be dealt with: pectin, lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose. My company, LeBlanc CNE, don’t use no toxic chemicals. No lye! <- double entendre We use food grade enzymes instead. We don't kill fish downstream.

    Papermakers love what we produce. It takes a fraction of the time in a Hollander Beater because we've done much of the work chemically. Our largest customer was used to paying $7/lb for imported bast but when got old of ours, they offer $10 Textiles are a bit different. It appears we're removing too much of the lignin and/or cellulose for it to be spun and woven. I've think I know how to prep bast specifically for textiles.

    Hemp plastic is next on our list and I have a meeting with our chemist tomorrow. Cellulose is a polymer after all.

    We're that BIPOC hemp company is Cascadia doing R&D in conjunction with WSU & the USDA. Buncha self funded radical farmers and citizen scientists doing great sh*t as fast as we can. And there's a Kickstarter campaign in the not too distant future…

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.