[Dan] wanted to learn a bit about solid state ignition in engines; to get started he needed a test subject, so he decided he would upgrade his old 12 horsepower lawnmower.
Originally the lawnmower engine used a magneto coil ignition system, magnetos are simple and very common in lawnmowers. The magneto is designed to produce a high voltage spike when influenced by a magnetic field. A magnet is attached to the engine’s crankshaft to time the voltage spikes, these spikes are fed directly into the spark plugs to cause ignition, this is why you don’t need a battery. [Dan] explains how the solid state ignition works on his site as he goes through the build details. Essentially it uses a hall effect sensor to detect a spinning magnet on the crankshaft for timing, and a transistor and battery to fire the spark plugs for ignition.
Once he got his circuit up and running on a breadboard, he fitted the entire system into a neat plastic box and fixed it to the front of the lawnmower, as if it was meant to be there all along.
dont like it
its good for a proof of concept, but nothing more
no timing control = either trouble starting, or no power at high rpm
not to mention the way he “tuned” it by hand, I guess the criteria was “oh, it works, lets drill holes here and bolt that thing”
This is almost the perfect hack. He did something non-trivial, that he has no formal training in. He actually got it to work, which is no small feat.
What timing could he possible need, other than the hall switch and magnet?
Engines require different ignition timing depending on the load and engine speed. By “require”, of course, I mean “it would be nice to have if you want maximum torque output”.
As you said, it’s a good hack in the sense that he got it to work. It does add complexity however, and without variable timing it doesn’t really give much benefit. But once it’s on there and working it’s not a big feat to add other cool stuff.
We talking lawnmowers not building dragsters I’d like to see someone out do cause out in the field it’ll get u home
I’ve never seen variable ignition timing on a mower.
That is true.. almost all magneto systems for small engines and older bikes are fixed ignition timing.. which includes the above mower.. the other posters obviously don’t know enough about ignition systems.
Small engines do NOT have variable timing. They are FIXED timing.
Hey guys I have a question ….I’m attempting to make an ignition set up like in a chainsaw or lawnmower on a 80cc gy6 engine due to the pickup coil and it’s mounting posts are broke clean off . So I thought I could put the chain coil in place of the pickup coil and glue a strong magnet to the outer side of flywheel. Will it work?
As far as I can recall from the last small engine I took apart, there isn’t a whole lot of what you’re talking about in a magneto system to begin with. There’s no mechanical or vacuum spark advance to speak of so I think this hack is just fine, especially if the parts are cheaper than an actual magneto(around $50), even more so since the last magneto I replaced that was supposed to be a perfect fit, wasn’t which caused my tiller to die every 5 minutes or so.
In a magneto system like that there is no timing advance of any sort. My aunt has an old generator with the same setup. The ignition coil is mounted to the pickup itself, which is mounted above the flywheel. The magnet goes by, charges the pickup and fires the coil. End of story. Troll elsewhere.
On a related note the coil on her generator just died, I may have to copy this for her!
there’s a governor of sorts on some lawnmowers, basically operating the choke and throttle, with a longer spring than the primary throttle spring, letting it rev up a little under load.
@rasz this has the “timing control” that original would have. On the original the points serve as a crank position sensor of sorts. The Hall Effect sensor is replacing the points as a crank position sensor. Manually searching for the optimal position to mount the Hall Effect sensor shouldn’t be a big deal.
LOL Jim the builder only mentioned “advance” in the context of the simplicity of small engine ignition systems. Some how that got twisted into meaning that small engines have spark advance mechanisms. Small engine magneto are pretty trouble free, I really doubt I’d go through the trouble to replace it with a battery power ignition. In the event I where to I’d use the original points as the crank position sensor. When you get down to it it that’s all the points, and the crank lobe that opens them are. They already come from the factory designed to fire the spark plug at the optimum moment.
@rasz: You stand corrected by me. It has lots of power and no trouble starting. I also used the TRA12D service manual’s recommendation of 18 degrees before TDC to establish the bolt holes. Thanks hackaday for the review.
You forget that this was replacing a magneto system. It’s functionally identical to same.
Exactly. The only regulating functions for small engines seem to revolve around adding a bit of extra fuel if the RPMs get a little low. Otherwise I’ve never seen a lawnmower engine with spark advance or otherwise.
Agreed. Never heard of such a thing myself either, I saw this hack and thought, hell yeah this will work great if you set it up right.
Then you get all these assholes trolling in here about how it won’t fire right at high loads or whatever, people, I have a small engines certificate I spent 4 months training for to get from a college. If I say there is no such thing as spark advance on a small engine, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SPARK ADVANCE ON A SMALL ENGINE, FINAL STORY.
Half the people making comments here have probably never even pulled the carberator apart on their push mower, which is probably the only small engine they own.
You spent 4 months get that cert, and know everything? Hate to break it to you, but I been doing this going on 35 years, and I have in fact worked on plenty of small single cylinder gas engines with spark advance.
is it required to run correctly, no not in most applications. In those that is designed into, you can tell a difference when is disabled
I thought since the age of pointless electronic ignitions being applied to single cylinder gasoline engines there has been the possibility (at least in more recent designs) for these electronic modules to have some built-in functionality that would allow for a programmed spark advance curve to be implemented. This could make modern engine more efficient and better power producers given their size and weight than we experienced using the old fixed timing magneto systems. Correct me if I am wrong but my experience goes back to when Mopeds first began offering electronic ignitions and performance amazingly improved on those 50CC small engines.
Second that. Absolutely right. A proper design for a modern and not so old engine would definitely include spark advance mechanism, although not easily visible and obvious to uneducated fellow. It could easily be checked by using a stroboscope.
Well U are half rite early motors do not have. However to meet EPA rules advance timing introduced this can be in cdi box or pick up coil has low output north pole start smart south pole high revs or TCI neg purse low rev pos pos high rev all pure wave chine inverter have this
1958 C90 Silver Pigeon 200 cc 4 cycle Gas Motor Scooter with Kick Start SPARK RETARDER lever….Engine Runs In ADVANCE….
I agre I had an old jd engine Kohler engine that wouldn’t get no fire due to this coil which was mounted to the magneto we’re not firing yes it had points I took a Mopar ignition coil and put in between my points an the magneto . Yes points were crank driven . Only issue there were two spark plug wires only needed one so just tied one up stuck it away if anyone knows anything about a hole GIF JD is hard to find parts for and that’s a good hat saving Time save me money and and a lot of parts finally time they’re just haters cuz they can’t seem to figure it out
I like the classic magneto system better… also many magnetos don’t simply feed the voltage generated directly to the spark plug, but instead charge up a capacitor as it rotates, and releases the spark at a specific point.
I thought that capacitor was to suppress some of the RF interference you get with a spark. The voltage isn’t going to get any higher on that rotation. Or are there points? And if there are, why? The point of a magneto is the simplicity.
So nobody else caught how he described the Hall Effect as an actual hall? It’s called that not because the electrons are marching down a hall, it was named after Edwin Hall who discovered the effect.
He could use this to set the timing and get moar power!!!
@mike d no this can be use to set ignition timing for more power, deviate to far from the optimal setting here you will weaken the strength of the spark to the point of no ignition at all.
Very good! lets try to think of other areas that this can be applied.
A classic magneto system is much simpler, of course, but the point of this hack was to see if he could use a hall effect device to control spark timing, and he did that. Bravo! Regarding the comment that it doesn’t provide variable timing, true, but then neither does the original magneto system. The next step in this electronic ignition project possibly would be to work out when to fire the coil based on engine rpm (variable timing), perhaps using the hall effect device as a crankshaft position sensor and then develop another circuit to make a spark at the right time. Interesting. Thanks!
Hey guys! There’s a whole lot of misinformation afloat here! The old magneto ignition has a mechanical switch, which used to be called “the points” in car talk. The sliding cam follower wears and ignition timing undergoes undesirable change. The engine flywheel must be removed (with a custom pulling tool) to service this wear prone part. The “solid state” ignition uses a coil (not a Hall effect device) to switch a transistor which replaces the old wear-prone “points” of a magneto. Presto, no more timing drift, more reliability. Despite what is said in the intro, there is no battery involved. The “solid state” ignition is still a magneto, driven by a moving magnet, just without the wear prone points.
uh, not on a lawnmower. there’s no contact points at all, just a magnet flying past a coil.
I think you are talking about a distributor for engines with more than one cylinder?
I agree that this particular hack did not improve performance and added complexity. And it needs batteries now?? Adding fuel injection seems like a much better deal, plus spark timing from the ECU would provide the benefits that this setup could be providing. I beleive there was an EFI conversion recently posted actually..
uh, no. if you look underneath the flywheen you will find the points, capacitor and otherwise. its there on my tecumseh 1577, and most brigs and straton. the only part you see on the outside is the coil
http://www.asecc.com/data/briggs/images/fmag.jpg
http://images.craigslist.org/3n73k33pd5Q55P65S3b8m1b129e30a2c914cb.jpg
Ok guys you got me to pull out my Briggs & Stratton Service and Repair Instructions (part# 270962-3/92)and open to section 2. Depending on how old the engine he has it will have what they call “breaker points”. They will be housed either between the engine and fly wheel or in a box off to the side. In either case they are mechanical and driven by a cam in most cases milled into the crank shaft. I know they are there because I have fought with a 1968 engine with a stripped keyway for the fly wheel and part of the repairs I did was to replace and set the breaker points for the ignition system. I wish I could find a diagram of how this Magneto and points system works. And thank god we have solid state ignition now. No more pulling that F flywheel to adjust dwell and no more 6 to 10 pulls to start the engine. I never thought of just replacing the ignition system with electronics. For the more modern ignitions systems here is a site with some diagrams http://home.earthlink.net/~edstoller/id9.html
I the case of Dan’s adaptation, yes he used 12v
https://www.dansworkshop.com/2008/03/homebuilt-solid-state-ignition-module/
Two pry bars and a soft hammer used judiciously will remove most small engine flywheels that bolt to a tapered shaft … But for ‘newbies’, yes get the “custom” pulling tool(I make my own)
Something to note is that for the past 10+ years small engines have utilized electronic ignitions that have the same physical appearence and fixed mounting as simple magneto systems. In fact, it’s the ONLY type used now so it’s not usually even advertised as a new feature any longer. However, you will see such claims as Easy Start and Single Pull Crank. The new systems are actually pretty complex. They still use the magneto (strong moving magnet and coil) to generate the electrical power but that’s where the simularity stops. Beyound that point it is a completely electronic CDI (capacitive discharge ignition) system with varible timing. There are no contact points with the elec systems either. Although their position was not adjustable, the points were what controlled the timing on mag systems. Note that the earliest systems that were referred to as electronic only replaced the mechanical points with a semiconductor circuit. Conversion systems are still sold for DIY. These are not fully CDI systems with variable timing. The new fully Electronic systems are completely self contained with the only connection being a kill wire to cut power. The physical unit is mounted so that the flywheel magnet passes by it to charge the circuit way before piston TDC (top dead center). This situation allows the unit to delay the spark until the built in timing map calls for it. Engines need to spark near TDC to make for easy cranking but quickly need the spark to occur advanced of TDC to compensate for the speed at which the piston is traveling. Combustion is not instantanious when the spark occurs so the spark is set to occur just before the piston gets there so that max explosition power occurs just as the piston PASSES TDC. If max occurs before TDC, it will try to push the piston down before it’s reached TDC and therefore pushing the crankshaft in reverse. The higher the RPM the more advanced the spark needs to occur. Varible speed engines, such as car engines, need to provide power and efficiency at many RPM ranges during use. Small engines typically run at a constant goverened RPM. They also don’t have any other sensors to indicate air density or engine load so the timing curve programmed into the unit is simple and is set for average conditions at the engines goverened RPM. Since air density is directly related to altitude, the manufacturer must program the timing so that the engine will run anywhere in the region it’s being sold in. In the USA, that’s a huge range so the users near sea level and in high altitudes are not getting peak performance. But obviously the sys works well and MUCH better than old fixed timing non electronic systems. Also, for anyone wondering how the sys detects RPM, it uses two hall effect sensors and measure the time it takes the flywheel magnet to pass from one to the other. It would seem that simply replacing an old mag unit with a new unit would give the engine an updated high tech ign system. Well it would almost work since the mounting brackets are similar and you could probably find a new unit that would fit with little to no modification. The problem is that the new unit must be mounted at a specific point way before TDC but the old units were mounted much closer. I have made the conversion by using the new style unit from a doner engine where I could measure how many degrees in advance of TDC the unit was mounted. I then had to fab a new mount for the old engine. The target was an old garden tiller that would bring a grown man to tears just trying to get the dang thing cranked. It now cranks within the first 3 pulls. FYI my knowledge and experience on this subject comes from working with 2-stroke weed eater type engines used on RC boats so that timing can be varied based on fuel octane, air density, temp., and such. Also, new style elec units also have a rev limiter built in. The record maker engine builders are getting around 17HP at 19,000 RPM from a 30cc engine that would make around 1.2HP at 7,000 RPM on your weed whacker.
Dude, you definitely know your stuff, but it was hard reading on big long paragraph.
Zillabill,
are you still around. seems like you have the know how to help brother out. i have a vintage honda genset ems4000 and ignition parts no longer available. might you have a solution i could use to replace the bad cdi ignitoin coil? (apparently the cdi and coil are both in one unit) I’ve replaced the pick up coil because the resistance reading were not within specs but no luck. the manual says to replace the cdi ignition coil if all other reading/test are within specs which they are now. Any help or guidance would be greatly appreciated.
thanks,
miloaksrider
This is pretty cool, but the magneto is still used for a reason, it’s super economic/efficient.
I’d like to see more though, maybe some more timing algo and part wear warnings.
do it off magneto too
yeh…I’d like Frys wit dat too…..
yea all you guys are smart …. but the main reason this is a good fix is because orig parts for most of the older engines do not exist any longer or are very expensive….
That photograph looks like a screenshot straight from a game in the Half-Life universe. Are we sure this guy doesn’t work for Black Mesa?
Anybody got a guess to the age of that engine? Looks pretty old especially with that starter hooked to the engine with a v-belt. I assume it also works as the generator to charge the battery. From my experience with a 1968 single cylinder engine, on a tiller, there are a number of reason I could see saying screw this to the old system and creating my own. I almost did on that engine. So I like this hack. It brings an Old engine back to life. In my case the engine still runs but I have repairs to make to the gear box for the tiller. But if I have timing problems again with it I will consider converting it.
Thanks for the inspiration.
At least it’s not another POV. Instead it’s an interesting hack and experiment.
I totally agree..I think that makes us trolls though..
I’ll be the one with the balls to say there is too much marketing and too little original ideas/imagination in this scene. How many arduino based lighting or boyscout projects are we going to see?
No, enjoying a hack doesn’t make you a troll. Being a jerk about the others does. As we’ve said over, and over, we’re bringing hacks of all different levels. No need to be negative to those that are simpler than what appeals to you.
If you want to be the one with the balls, please do(or find) some awesome, not beginner, hacks and send them in. We really do appreciate the tips.
Psssh
@aztraph, @keville
Sorry for the long paragraph. Didn’t seem that long until I saw it AFTER clicking submit.
I’ve been acused of having diarrhea-of-the-mouth. Guess it “runs” over to the keyboard too. But still better to have diarrhea-of-the-keyboard than diarrhea-on-the-keyboard! The latter is a real $hitty situation. Makes your typing stink too. This response is an example.
The comments are very entertaining!
One of my welders has a Wisconsin engine in it and finding parts in my area is troublesome; I could understand someone implementing a solution like this.
The great thing about situations involving engines running at a single governed speed(literal thinkers/nitpickers, please don’t embarrass yourselves by arguing the academic issue of governor hysteresis) is that you don’t really need adjustable settings; at least not dynamically. You tune it to run optimally at that that RPM and put it to work.
@Dan: Congratulations on getting off your rear and doing something; it’s more than I can brag about lately…and I don’t just say that because I have a seat at my workbench.
Yes, is are there.
It’s a TRA-10 or 12D Wisconsin. Wisconsin’s foray into low-deck short piston & rod engines to sell more for gargden tractors. Not many were made. Better than anything else ever made exept for the old tall Wisconsins. Parts for these things got outrageous after Continental Teledyne (aircraft engine people) bought them out. Killed ‘ em as manufacturers, in fact. Finally, Robin, good japanese engine people bought ’em. Then Subaru, a division of Fuji Heavy Industries bought the lot. If I had to fix a no-fire TRA Wisconsin, and it had a battery – I would use a FoMoCo “TFI-IV” ignition module and the Wisconsin’s breaker points without the condenser. I just love HOT sparks at ZERO RPM! (You’d have to use Ford’s “E-Core” coil, also. That’s how I’d do it – if you had a battery.
Yes, it’s a Wisconsin TRA-12D. Still running great. Never had breaker points that I know of. Starting is great, I start it with a rope now, a few years back the starter/generator broke and I never bothered to fix.
It was my understanding that when the cdi came out in the 80s ,u could buy one for any of the briggs and stratton flat head engines of that era ,so it was an upgrade for about $20. But, my Question is, “Does this cdi. Unit give any spark advance? And if it does, how much does it give?” Also if it does give advance, it seems like it would increase hp bye at least 20-30% with a retrofit right?
Please email me if u know the answers or have some good ideas cuz im buiding some 6700 rpm 5hp Tecumseh engines with billet rods that should put out 8.8 hp .
Watch out for exploding flywheels with that overspeed!!!!
The hall effect is used on most single cylinder motorcycle engines i have worked on to send signal to the cdi. It is the cdi which advances or even retards ignition in relation to rpm which allows us to map the engine for a controlled power curve.
The lawnmower hack described has no real need for a cdi or ecu because it has a low maximum load which is why this type of engine lasts so long so the only real benefit of playing with the power curve would be fuel economy unless you plan on building a go kart.
old lawn mowers have points,,(vacume adavce on a magnito,,sounds nito).my new brigs has no points to my surprize,,i use to work at repair shop in 80s
I’d like to see more pictures that show component level detail, please. If that option is already available, then I need some guidance since I’m not finding it.
What is the solution for an Echo CS evl 650 chainsaw that will not fire can not find a coil to replace it what do you know about that sure would like to know I have one that has drove me crazy I tried an electronic ignition off of another echo pb650 blower and modified it to where it will fit on it and it fire with a blue Spark but will not start with ether or pop I’m thinking I may have to add a capacitor or something like that because the original coil have some sort of module mounted onto it but I am still researching and trying to find all of the information I can no luck so far any help would be greatly
The echo 650 coil trick is to get your donor coil timed right. Just because it sparks doesn’t mean it will run. I did a similar thing on a Echo 440 evl saw. I removed the winding (actual coil covered with plastic with the plug wire) from poulan saw and used the Echo armature plate ( laminated metal part of the coil that mounts to the saw) to Frankenstein a new coil from the 2 different coils. This way its a no fuss bolt right back on the saw. The timing was close enough for the saw to run, but its off enough to change the rpm of the engine. In my case it was to my advantage because my Frankenstein coil is advanced more than stock so it reves much higher rpm. Downside is a little less torque. But its a healthy enough displacement engine to still work good. I have a few old 650 evl saws Im gonna do the same thing with. I even bought the same coil you did to try. Just haven’t gotten to that project yet. Its do-able though. Just need to find the right donor coil by using trial and error. The other alternative for you is to find out where your donor coil, pb-650 is firing on in relation to TDC and then to re key the flywheel for correct timing. Moving the magnets on the flywheel where it passes the coil moves timing. You can usually only move the coil so much but the flywheel can be moved around quite a bit by re cutting a new key way. Not an easy job without the right tools though. A degree wheel is needed and can be made pretty easy. Spin the saw over with a drill and socket on the flywheel nut. Use a timing light to find out where spark is and degree it back or forward where needed with a new key way. The old EVL series saws all use 30 degrees BTDC. Ive been doing mods on small engines for 30+ years and an earlier post on this thread about 30cc 17 HP RC boat engines is good but not accurate on HP. I have loads of these RC boat engines that turn 20,000 rpm and HP is closer to 9 to 10 hp on actual dyno machines. Still amazing power for the displacement. I was doing trial and error mods on actual weed eater engines for RC boats before the RC boat engines even came on the market. Made my own piston rods, water cooled heads, reed valves, milled cases to increase compression, porting cases and pistons, moved flywheel keys to change timing and even made my own tuned pipes. BTW Echo engines held most all the RC boat records back before this got big.
I have many echo evl models .they have a cdi aND a seperate coil. The cdi have been discontinued and do not interchange with each other. Has anyyone successfully rigged another saws cdi/coil combo to work on a 550evl? I agree that the keyway may need changed. The 440 fits but is somehow off time.
Its a pain in the ass trying to make a coil work in place of the cdi for any of the old Echo saws Brad. I just got lucky when I tried the Poulan coil on my 44o evl. I tried the 650evl with a few different doaner coils and not even close on timing yet with any of the ones I’ve tried. I keep an eye out on Flea bay for actual echo cdi parts and find them now and then. Its easier to bolt the right part on for sure. But it can be done with others. Just time consuming
Mike W. says:30+ years ago i put in a solid state points replacement kit when Briggs -Stratton first sold them,what a difference,i wondered about advance too but points timing was fixed anyway.My 1979 Buick even fire v-6 came with hall-effect ignition ,mechanical advance. When i cut the block to make a v twin all that was needed was to grind off four of the reluctors(breaker cam equivalents) to not have to fire the non-existant cylinders.
I need to do something like this to the Kohler k181 engine on my Gravely walk behind tractor. I’m having trouble keeping my points clean/working properly. It has a magneto, condenser (look out for the shock, discharge it before handling) and cam driven points. The tuning instructions say that adjusting the point gap effects the spark timing. I’ve only static timed it relying on the gap. There are some other mechanisms I haven’t yet wrapped my brain around, but a lever is activated when the rpms pick up. Probably not an advance. They made these with battery powered starters, but I prefer the magneto pull start – It can sit all winter, or even years, and then work, with no dead battery to contend with.
I just recently got comfortable enough using a computer online to attempt “chatting”, so I thought I would contribute my two cents on the subject of souping-up small engines and upgrading the stock ignition to a high-energy system with dynamic timing.
I’ve successfully shoe-horned electronic ignition components from automobiles onto 3 small engines to date. They all worked well enough but there were issues, the obvious one being the necessity of a battery. One of the engines (a Honda overhead valve) ran a generator so electricity wasn’t a problem. Neither was the lack of a timing advance mechanism as it was designed to run at one constant speed and acceleration wasn’t an issue.
However, the other two were on go-carts which didn’t have any type of charging system, so the little sealed batteries
i used eventually discharged and the motor would sputter and die. Obviously an alternator was needed. The other problem was the timing. I didn’t realize it at the time, but looking back I now realize that these engines were limited as far as rpm to horsepower was concerned.
On a positive note, when one installs all the guts from an HEI system, the engine starts on the first or second revolution! I could almost start my wisconsin robin by spinning the crank with my hand. there were a lot of times where the engine would “cough” when I turned on the power switch from a partial charge of fuel/air in the cylinder!
Now I’m working on a pretty cool project featuring a two-stroke bIcycle engine. You know, the ones with a manual clutch that come in kit form for converting a bike into a “motorcycle”. My customer wants to install it in a Razor mini-bike so I suggested we have some fun with it and open it up a bit. I actually found a green anodized hi-po head for it to raise the compression ratio and I’m going to get a buddy to zap up a little chamber pipe for it. (remember, it’s a 2-strke). install a moderately larger carb, port out the intake and fabricate some sort of advance mechanism and this should be one a bad little razor! If anyone is interested in seeing my progress e-mail me at josephnicholas344@gmail.com and I’ll shoot you some pics.
waddya think?
Hi Guys – the Brit on the following youtube video had re-purposed the electronic ignition from a Strimmer and used it to replace a motorcycle points ignition. – the video shows him building it and making it work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPXbsWEs5IA . I was looking into this because I am looking into replacing the points on a 1971 Honda CB350. I get sticker shock from the $245 cost of an off the shelf custom built electronic ignition.
BUT – looking at the skills and equipment (a lathe) required to trim down a strimmer or chainsaw ignition parts and install, it is likely to cost more than $245 of my time and effort to duplicate what he has done.
However – the youtube shows that small gas powered strimmer ignition systems can be repurposed – not just in concept – he shows it working. I think I will restore my cb350 fully first, then assess whether I want to spend a further $245.