Here’s a fun exercise: take a list of the 20th century’s inventions and innovations in electronics, communications, and computing. Make sure you include everything, especially the stuff we take for granted. Now, cross off everything that can’t trace its roots back to the AT&T Corporation’s research arm, the Bell Laboratories. We’d wager heavily that the list would still contain almost everything that built the electronics age: microwave communications, data networks, cellular telephone, solar cells, Unix, and, of course, the transistor.
But is that last one really true? We all know the story of Bardeen, Brattain, and Shockley, the brilliant team laboring through a blizzard in 1947 to breathe life into a scrap of germanium and wires, finally unleashing the transistor upon the world for Christmas, a gift to usher us into the age of solid state electronics. It’s not so simple, though. The quest for a replacement for the vacuum tube for switching and amplification goes back to the lab of Julius Lilienfeld, the man who conceived the first field-effect transistor in the mid-1920s.
Vacuums and Emissions
You’d expect big things from a physicist whose Ph.D. advisor was none other than Max Planck, and while Julius Lilienfeld isn’t exactly a household name, he had a long and productive career. Born in 1882 in present-day Lviv, now in Ukraine but then part of Austria-Hungary, Lilienfeld trained at the Friedrich Wilhelm University in Berlin. He earned his doctorate in physics in 1905 and took a non-tenure track professorship at Leipzig University. There he concentrated on the physics of electric discharges in a vacuum, which led directly to some of his earliest patents for medical X-ray tubes. He also worked on cryogenic gasses, leading to work with Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin and his famous dirigibles.
Clearly more of an applied physicist than a theoretician – he only achieved a “satisfactory” rating from Planck on his examination of his knowledge of Maxwell-Hertz equations – Lilienfeld was more eager to patent his ideas than publish scholarly papers on them. He traveled to the United States in 1921 to pursue patent claims on his X-ray tubes against General Electric, and to take some temporary lecturing assignments at New York University.
It was during this period that Lilienfeld first recorded his idea about semiconductor switches. How exactly he came to the conclusion that semiconductors could be used to replace vacuum tubes for switching and amplification is lost to history. It may have stemmed from his early interest in vacuum discharge and his study of field emission, the emission of electrons by electrostatic fields, as opposed to the thermionic emission of vacuum tubes. He was also interested in solid-state rectifiers, and patented an idea for one using compressed copper and sulfur powder.
What is clear is that in 1926, he filed for a patent on his “Method and apparatus for controlling electric currents,” which followed up a 1925 Canadian application for the same. The application described a film of “uni-directional conductivity” across two closely spaced metal electrodes. Lilienfeld suggested that copper sulfide would be a suitable compound for the film, and he described a number of methods for depositing it, including vacuum sputtering. He also describes the control of current through the thin film of copper sulfide by “applying thereto an electrostatic force” through a third electrode located between the two others. Julius Lilienfeld had described a thin-film FET perfectly, and went on to explain how such a device could be used to switch and amplify currents.
Sadly, Lilienfeld does not appear to have ever built a working prototype of his device; indeed, there’s no evidence that he ever even tried. He also never published any of his work other than as patent applications, so the world would remain ignorant of his insights for another two decades, when Bell Labs started working on what would become the transistor. In fact, Bill Shockley, always included in the official history of the birth of the transistor as the leader of the team, was in fact pointedly excluded by AT&T management from the original point-contact transistor patent application specifically because of Lilienfeld’s patents; the AT&T patent attorneys feared Shockley’s field-effect theories would cause confusion with Lilienfeld’s prior art.
While Lilienfeld missed out on credit for the first FET, he had a long and productive career. In 1926 he left academia, taking an R&D position with Ergon Research Laboratories in Massachusetts. There he invented the electrolytic capacitor in 1931. He amassed a respectable collection of patents over his career, 15 German and 60 from the US and Canada. His skills as an inventor earned him enough that his widow, Beatrice Ginsburg Lilienfeld, left a bequest to the American Physical Society to fund an annual prize in her husband’s memory. Sadly, the APS officials had no idea who Julius was, and had to look up his accomplishments before establishing the Julius Edgar Lilienfeld Prize in 1988.
It’s a shame Lilienfeld didn’t try to build one of his devices, but even if he had, it likely would not have worked exactly as described, given the materials he had available at the time. Julius Lilienfeld was clearly ahead of his time, but it’s tantalizing to think what might have been if the transistor had been invented twenty years earlier.
31 thoughts on “Julius Lilienfeld And The First Transistor”
I remember in college that a professor mentioned in passing that the FET was theorized first, because its operation is far more straightforward than a BJT, but they were unable to manufacture them because of the state of technology. Now I know the rest of the story.
Nothing like the good ole’ American patent system to muddy the waters about the development of a technology. A hearty mix of secrecy, techno-babble, and the special blend of public disclosure; vague enough that the patent can be applied to anything and not infringe on prior art, just specific enough application of known tech to get it granted without actually explaining any of the nuances on how it works.
Well said. It’s hard to believe that Armstrong lost his important patent to DeForrest when if it hadn’t been for the patent system he would have been continuing to build, moving into stereo and who knows what after instead of gravity research that abruptly ended his career.
I’m a bit hesitant to give a lot of credit to somebody who comes up with a good idea, but fails to actually build it or encourage others to build it, so it goes nowhere for decades.
It’s not even obvious that Lilienfeld’s work seriously influenced the work on FETs that would be developed decades later.
How do you feel about Einstein? ;-)
There’s a place in the world for theorists. Not necessarily in HaD given our hands-on bias, bit it was an interesting story anyway.
Perhaps it’s also a useful example of how patents can sometimes stifle innovation?
Einstein doesn’t fall under what Carl defined because he did cause other people to work on his stuff, unlike our little patent troll here
He’s obviously not a patent troll. He made actual inventions, practical or not, not buy up patents and pursue litigation.
That isn’t what a patent troll is.
Patents are about the idea, not the working prototype. Once you get it to work, you can publish a scholarly article.
“He was also interested in solid-state rectifiers, and patented an idea for one using compressed copper and sulfur powder.”
After the apocalypse, this will be one of the first electronics made.
” He also never published any of his work other than as patent applications, so the world would remain ignorant of his insights for another two decades, when Bell Labs started working on what would become the transistor.”
No patent searches for prior art then?
It reminded me of selenium rectifiers of yore…
I thought Lilienfeld did not use semiconductors and that was the innovation of Bell Labs. Interesting to wonder if a military secretly figured out the transistor centuries earlier but never patented or announced it to the public to take advantage of competitors and enemy armies. Either way, Lilienfeld is really an unknown hero of the public in my opinion.
Movie idea: Alternate WW2 where one side has transistors (awful ones of course) but is trying to deploy them while keeping them secret
That was real life in the early ’70’s. While the US and S Vietnam had transistorized radios, the N Vietnamese had Chinese-built clones of US WW II tube radios. I know this because I have one (Chinese 102E HF radio set) with a build date of 1968.
Well US military itself was using tube radios into the 1960’s. And N. Vietnamese were getting only second-rate Soviet and Chinese equipment, so it doesn’t fall into the US hands.
It was (and probably still is) a Soviet and Russian policy never to export some combat systems. For example Su-15 in the 1960’s, some tanks, etc. Ask yourself why.
During the Vietnam war, US Army National Guard units had tube radio equipment (hand me downs from the “real” Army).
Well, then the Russians had a solid state rectifier since the 1920’s in that scenario.
(Maybe HaD covered that story, was it titanium oxide? Further development was stopped because the US was the chief source of the material)
Didn’t the U.S. have to shell company round about buy titanium from the Soviets for the A-12/SR-71 & M-21/D-21 systems? At least in the late 50’s early 60’s.
But then, CuS *is* a semiconductor.
Seems I recall Great Britain hiding radio and RADAR technology somewhat maybe linked to Bose or others and giving to the U.S. before the U.S. entered WW2 to assist with development in larger scale. I forget which documentary or where I read.
https://www.computerhistory.org/siliconengine/the-theory-of-electronic-semi-conductors-is-published/ (see the next two milestones).
Well the Chinese invented the magnetic compass hundreds of years before Europeans, but they only used it for fung-shui, sometimes the times also have to be right for the technology.
Or did the Europeans use the luopan for something as mundane as navigation?
Feng Shui = Wind Water, when the Europeans used them for maritime navigation, of course!
I remember this being a question on a semiconductor theory exam paper.
Emil Warburg actually build some of those FETs with very short lifespans.
Take a look at a replica of the first transistor
Ages ago I saw an old “Amateur Scientist” column in Scientific American about this transistor with instructions for making your own on a microscope slide. Never built one.
If light sensing CdS cells respond to externally applied electric fields, even slightly – they’d be an implementation of Lilienfeld’s patent.
SparkBangBuzz turned a CdS Photocell Into A FET Transistor:
You can print CdS Transistors too:
luckily some guys broke the toplayer and discovered the transistor ;)
Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)