People are obsessed with the time and the weather. We’ve talked about the weather since we were all cave dwellers hunting with spears. But the time is a different matter. Sure, people always had the idea of the passage of time. The sun rising and setting gives a natural sense of days, but daylight and dark periods vary by the time of year and to get an accurate and linear representation of time turns out to be rather difficult. That is unless you are a Greek engineer living in Alexandria around 250 BC.
Legend has it that and engineer working in his father’s barbershop led him to discover not only the first working clock, but also the pipe organ, launching the field of pneumatics in the process. That engineer was named Ctesibius and while his story is mostly forgotten, it shows he has a place as a historical hacker.
You might think there were timekeeping devices before 250 BC, and that’s sort of true. However, the devices before Ctesibius had many limitations. For example, a sundial can tell time, but only if the sun is shining. At night or during a storm it is worthless.
The Problem with Water Clocks
One early way to measure time was the clepsydra. This is essentially a pot with a spout near the bottom that you can close with a bung. The Greeks used these for, among other things, giving lawyers on both sides of a debate equal time. A timekeeper would fill the clepsydra to a mark and remove the bung. Your time ran out when no more water came through the spout. If there was a recess, the bung could pause the timer.
This kind of clock has been around for many years and in many ancient cultures. China may have had them as early as 4,000 BC and India possibly around 2,500 BC. Egypt developed them somewhere around 1,400 BC.
The problem with the clepsydra is that more water comes out when it is full than when the pot is nearly empty. So while it works to make sure everyone gets the same amount of time, you couldn’t, for example, time three people by letting one clepsydra fill a cup with water. The first cup would fill faster than the last cup due to the changing water pressure in the vessel.
Ctesibius worked in his father’s barbershop — that’s the modern parlance since we don’t know what they were really called in 200 BC Alexandria. Apparently, there was quite a bit of dripping water in the shop. The dripping water gave him an idea and the result was a series of clocks that would remain the most accurate clocks in the world until the pendulum clock appeared in 1656.
How it Worked
While a normal clepsydra has a fixed amount of water, Ctesibius’ version had a larger source of water above it. It would fill the lower vessel faster than the spout drained water. In addition, the lower vessel had an overflow sluice so that excess water would runoff.
Because the top vessel fills the lower vessel faster than the water exits, the lower vessel stays full all the time — at least as long as the upper vessel isn’t empty. Because the lower vessels’ pressure stays constant, the flow of water from the spout also stays constant, meaning you can measure time linearly. For example, collecting the water from the spout in a third vessel with a float will tell you how long the clock has been running. If the float takes 10 minutes to rise 1 inch, then an hour is 6 inches.
While these clocks were considered accurate in their day, they weren’t by modern standards. In particular, the viscosity of water affects the accuracy of the clock. Water’s viscosity can change a few percentage points with each degree of temperature change. Freezing water won’t work at all. There’s no evidence that ancient water clocks regulated their temperature, so the clocks were probably not very accurate. However, these clocks were reset when refilled — a common occurrence — so at least the errors did not accumulate. You can presume they were reset to something like the sunrise or a sundial.
Lost to Time
Ctesibus apparently understood something about water pressure and also worked with compressed air. But the depth of his understanding and resulting inventions is a mystery. The very little we know about Ctesibus is through mentions of him in other works by Vitruvius, Athenaeus, Hero, and others. His works were mostly lost, probably in the fire at Alexandria.
Want to try your hand at making ancient clocks? Try the video below. Or try a more modern take on the water clock. If you want to see how far we’ve come, [Bill] has a good explanation of atomic clocks which are about as far from a clepsydra as you can get.
No mention of hourglasses? I haven’t googled it, but would have thought they were also an early “invention”.
Considering glass “technology” in the time of Ctesibius (That’s a worse name than ‘A boy named Sue’!) I don’t think that glass technology was up to making an hourglass, so it it post dates the water than why mention it?
Worse name ? What about the greek general… Scipio… pronounced Skippio… Or Adolph Schicklgruber…. (Hitlers real last name before his dad changed it). … Think of the laughter over the headline….. Schicklgruber Invades France !
Scipio is an awesome name, whaddya mean? He was an absolute chad too. He demolished carthage and salted the earth so that nothing would grow there again. Also Scipio was roman, not greek.
nope, the hourglass was quite a few hundred years later..
I have googled it and I landed on wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hourglass
“So while it works to make sure everyone gets the same amount of time”
That’s wrong. In the case of two people whoever goes 2nd, or in the case of multiple arguments by 2 people whoever goes last is disadvantaged and the person who goes first has the greatest advantage. Unless the clock were completely refilled for each participant’s presentation, as it should be.
How having three people involved worsens this escapes me. An obvious solution is to have a number of clocks equal to the number of participants.
As to the hourglass issue, the solution is obvious: lacking adequate glassmaking use a funnel. Lacking funnel technology use a sheep’s stomach. Lacking sand, use wine.
If you look at how they did it, they measured the time to fill something that marked the time. The whole point to the water clock is it that the flow rate was relatively constant even if the water did not get refilled. So if I have a constant flow rate X (granted, it won’t be super accurate, but it should be close given the temp shouldn’t vary 20 degrees in an hour or two and barring little mechanical issues) then when you fill up volume V will be the same time. That’s the whole point to the invention.
What would the advantage of sand in a funnel be over water in a bucket? Also don’t put wine in a sheep’s stomach, put in milk and you get cheese!
“lacking adequate glassmaking use a funnel…Lacking sand, use wine”
So you’re saying they should put liquid in a large container and let it run out of a small hole in the bottom…isn’t that exactly what is described here?
We do know how a barbershop in 200BC Alexandria was called: “koureion”. The action of hair cutting: “keiro”. Through the meanders of the language its descendants in modern times include shear, crust, quarry, cortex.