Hackaday Links: April 13, 2025

Hackaday Links Column Banner

It’s been a while since we’ve dunked on an autonomous taxi foul-up, mainly because it seemed for a while there that most of the companies field testing driverless ride-sharing services had either ceased operation or curtailed them significantly. But that appears not to be the case after a Waymo robotaxi got stuck in a Chick-fil-A drive-through. The incident occurred at the chicken giant’s Santa Monica, California location at about 9:30 at night, when the autonomous Jaguar got stuck after dropping off a passenger in the parking lot. The car apparently tried to use the drive-through lane to execute a multi-point turn but ended up across the entrance, blocking other vehicles seeking their late-evening chicken fix. The drive-through-only restaurant ended up closing for a short time while Waymo figured out how to get the vehicle moving again.

To be fair, drive-through lanes are challenging even for experienced drivers. Lanes are often narrow, curve radii are sometimes tighter than a large vehicle can negotiate smoothly, and the task-switching involved with transitioning from driver to customer can lead to mistakes. Drive-throughs almost seem engineered to make tempers flare, especially at restaurants where hangry drivers are likely to act out at the slightest delay. This is probably doubly so when drivers are stuck behind a driverless car, completely eliminating even the minimal decency that would likely be extended to a human driver who got themselves in a pickle. If people are willing to honk at and curse out the proverbial little old lady from Pasadena, they’re very unlikely to cooperate with a robotaxi and give it the room it needs to maneuver out of a tight spot. Perhaps that argues for a change in programming that accounts for real-world driving experiences as well as the letter of the law.

The big news from space this week was the private Fram2 mission, which took an all-civilian crew on the world’s first crewed polar flight. The four-person crew took off from Florida in a SpaceX Crew Dragon and rather than heading east towards Africa, took off due north and entered a retrograde orbit at 90° inclination, beating the previous record of 65° inclination by Valentina Tereshkova aboard Vostok 6 back in 1963. The Fram2 team managed a couple of other firsts, from the first medical X-rays taken in space to the first amateur radio contacts made from the Dragon.

It’s been a while, but Bill “The Engineer Guy” Hammack is back with a new video extolling the wonders of plastic soda bottles. If you think that’s a subject too mundane to hold your interest, then you’ve never seen Bill at work. The amount of engineering that goes into creating a container that can stand up to its pressurized content while being able to be handled both by automation machines at the bottling plant and by thirsty consumers is a lesson in design brilliance. Bill explains the whole blow-molding process, amazingly using what looks like an actual Coca-Cola production mold. We would have thought such IP would be fiercely protected, but such is Bill’s clout, we guess. The video is also a little trip down memory lane for some of us, as Bill shows off both the two-piece 2-liter bottles that used to grace store shelves and the ponderous glass versions that predated those. Also interesting is the look at the differences between hot-fill bottles and soda bottles, which we never appreciated before.

And finally, if you’ve ever been confused by which logical fallacy is clouding your thinking, why not turn to the most famous fictional logician of all time to clarify things? “Star Trek Logical Reasoning” is a YouTube series by CHDanhauser that uses clips from the Star Trek animated series to illustrate nearly 70 logical fallacies. Each video is quite short, with most featuring Commander Spock eavesdropping on the conversations of his less-logical shipmates and pointing out the flaws in their logic. Luckily, the 23rd century seems to have no equivalent of human(oid) resources, because Spock’s logical interventions are somewhat toxic by today’s standards, but that’s a small price to pay for getting your logical ducks in a row.

8 thoughts on “Hackaday Links: April 13, 2025

      1. So this is a poorly written website code, to my opinion.
        I also wrote several times in comments that the “Email me new comments” seems broken, since when i activate this option for new articles, i no more receive the subscription confirmation mail like before, and so i never receive any corresponding mail. But i still receive comment mails from old articles i’ve subscribed to years ago, using the same email address! I still hope this will be addressed, but nothing…

  1. “drive-through lanes are challenging even for experienced drivers”

    No. They really are not.
    They are challenging for people that lack ability, but think they dont so they try anyway, because too lazy to park and walk.

  2. The LessWrong website has a much larger collection of fallacies and other problems with reasoning. Link below is the one on “Generalization from fictional evidence”, which I just this weekend heard used by Josh Rogan (WaPo) on Overtime (Bill Mahr) (YouTube, around 7 minutes into the discussion). Apparently there was a movie about bringing back extinct dinosaurs that didn’t end well, so maybe we should not bring back dire wolves until we’ve thought through the issues some more?

    https://www.lesswrong.com/s/pmHZDpak4NeRLLLCw/p/rHBdcHGLJ7KvLJQPk

    (Similar with people predicting the downfall of civilization, based on whichever dystopian short story they read about needing to scream and not having a mouth or whatever.)

    LessWrong also goes through psychological fallacies and other quirks of human perception, such as the “fundamental attribution error” (see: Wikipedia page). Learned about that one and it transformed my view of the world. Someone cuts you off in traffic and you immediately assume he’s a jerk, and not that he’s taking his injured son to the hospital.

    Off and on, I go over to that site and grab a few fallacies and look to see if I can spot them in the real world. You would be quite surprised to find out how much of the world is actually based on bullshit.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.