It’s Nobel season again, with announcements of the prizes in literature, economics, medicine, physics, and chemistry going to worthies the world over. The wording of the Nobel citations are usually a vast oversimplification of decades of research and end up being a scientific word salad. But this year’s chemistry Nobel citation couldn’t be simpler: “For the development of lithium-ion batteries”. John Goodenough, Stanley Whittingham, and Akira Yoshino share the prize for separate work stretching back to the oil embargo of the early 1970s, when Goodenough invented the first lithium cathode. Wittingham made the major discovery in 1980 that adding cobalt improved the lithium cathode immensely, and Yoshino turned both discoveries into the world’s first practical lithium-ion battery in 1985. Normally, Nobel-worthy achievements are somewhat esoteric and cover a broad area of discovery that few ordinary people can relate to, but this is one that most of us literally carry around every day.
What’s going on with Lulzbot? Nothing good, if the reports of mass layoffs and employee lawsuits are to be believed. Aleph Objects, the Colorado company that manufactures the Lulzbot 3D printer, announced that they would be closing down the business and selling off the remaining inventory of products by the end of October. There was a reported mass layoff on October 11, with 90 of its 113 employees getting a pink slip. One of the employees filed a class-action suit in federal court, alleging that Aleph failed to give 60 days notice of terminations, which a company with more than 100 employees is required to do under federal law. As for the reason for the closure, nobody in the company’s leadership is commenting aside from the usual “streamlining operations” talk. Could it be that the flood of cheap 3D printers from China has commoditized the market, making it too hard for any manufacturer to stand out on features? If so, we may see other printer makers go under too.
For all the reported hardships of life aboard the International Space Station – the problems with zero-gravity personal hygiene, the lack of privacy, and an aroma that ranges from machine-shop to sweaty gym sock – the reward must be those few moments when an astronaut gets to go into the cupola at night and watch the Earth slide by. They all snap pictures, of course, but surprisingly few of them are cataloged or cross-referenced to the position of the ISS. So there’s a huge backlog of beautiful but unknown cities around the planet that. Lost at Night aims to change that by enlisting the pattern-matching abilities of volunteers to compare problem images with known images of the night lights of cities around the world. If nothing else, it’s a good way to get a glimpse at what the astronauts get to see.
Which Pi is the best Pi when it comes to machine learning? That depends on a lot of things, and Evan at Edje Electronics has done some good work comparing the Pi 3 and Pi 4 in a machine vision application. The SSD-MobileNet model was compiled to run on TensorFlow, TF Lite, or the Coral USB accelerator, using both a Pi 3 and a Pi 4. Evan drove around with each rig as a dashcam, capturing typical street scenes and measuring the frame rate from each setup. It’s perhaps no surprise that the Pi 4 and Coral setup won the day, but the degree to which it won was unexpected. It blew everything else away with 34.4 fps; the other five setups ranged from 1.37 to 12.9 fps. Interesting results, and good to keep in mind for your next machine vision project.
Have you accounted for shrinkage? No, not that shrinkage – shrinkage in your 3D-printed parts. James Clough ran into shrinkage issues with a part that needed to match up to a PCB he made. It didn’t, and he shared a thorough analysis of the problem and its solution. While we haven’t run into this problem yet, we can see how it happened – pretty much everything, including PLA, shrinks as it cools. He simply scaled up the model slightly before printing, which is a good tip to keep in mind.
And finally, if you’ve ever tried to break a bundle of spaghetti in half before dropping it in boiling water, you likely know the heartbreak of multiple breakage – many of the strands will fracture into three or more pieces, with the shorter bits shooting away like so much kitchen shrapnel. Because the world apparently has no big problems left to solve, a group of scientists has now figured out how to break spaghetti into only two pieces. Oh sure, they mask it in paper with the lofty title “Controlling fracture cascades through twisting and quenching”, but what it boils down to is applying an axial twist to the spaghetti before bending. That reduces the amount of bending needed to break the pasta, which reduces the shock that propagates along the strand and causes multiple breaks. They even built a machine to do just that, but since it only breaks a strand at a time, clearly there’s room for improvement. So get hacking!
13 thoughts on “Hackaday Links: October 20, 2019”
My hack to avoid breaking spaghetti into three or more pieces is to not break spaghetti at all.
This exactly. You *want* your spaghetti to be long.
That’s what she said.
I’ve dodged and experienced numerous layoffs at IBM.
What is this “60 days notice” you are referring to?
IBM is a biiig company. And, likely those who got pink slipped got severance of greater than 60 days. This occured for me when I got laid off once, they gave 3 months severance, and walked directly out the door. But in reality, to follow the law, I was given a regular paycheck for 2 months and then given one months severance. The laws are based around the percentage of people laid off at a site. Look at the WARN act.
(Just in case, since I can’t edit, the time mentioned was not at IBM, but at a different, yet still fairly large company)
It’s funny, I had just seen a video about how to bend hazel but not snap it… also by bending it around.
I used to work at Dagoma, a French 3D printer company. Our model, the “magis” is a Delta with a base fully 3d printed in one block.
We conducted testing and found out a 2-3% shrinkage. We had to account for that as it would cause issues with the particularly tricky kinematics of the delta.
Lulzbot is just not that great. In fact, since I’m not printing hundreds of items a month, I *much* prefer my Monoprice mini(120 bucks) to any Lulzbot product.
These things cost a ton, but they don’t include filament run-out sensing. They want you to use some bizzare custom version of Cura(Although you can easily use normal cura), which doesn’t seem to run on Kubuntu properly. Why bother developing a custom version at all? Can’t they just tell you the steps to set up regular Cura?
The real issue is that there’s no exportable printer profiles and central repo for them, but that’s another story.
At least provide an AppImage if you’re going to do a custom version?
The mechanical design is bulky and complex, with IIRC steps requiring things like putting a bolt through three layers at the same time, without good visibility of if you lined it up.
They insist on using 3D printable parts, which is great and open source and all, but it results in a lot of extra bulk to get it to be reliable.
All the extra nice features you might want at that price, like a decent color display, WiFi, a camera to watch progress, etc, are missing.
Print quality might be great, but who cares? You can’t really make most artistic things on any printer without post processing anyway, and for functional prints most cheap ones seem fine.
The only relevant advantage to me seems to be the build area and the decent print speed, and even then, I’m sure the slightly higher end Monoprice printers do just fine(Not that dang Select V2 thing, that one is very functional but rather obnoxious to use)
Do people not print in ABS very often? The shrink is why it doesn’t stick to the build plate very well unless you have a heated chamber, which reduces the temperature difference between the extruded temperature and the ambient temperature for the duration of the print. It’s something you deal with every print. I’m surprised that a 25 minute video can be made on such a basic concept that really just ends with “Scale up your print in the slicer to account for shrink.”
ABS has largely fallen out of favor. PLA is easier to print especially on cheaper machines. Several brands now have “tough PLA” too. I used ABS exclusively for a couple years but I’m switching to PLA since most of my prints don’t need the slight increase in strength. I may try nylon for giggles, that should be durable and I want to try using weed whacker spools.
I’ve wondered about line trimmer filament, but I recall being told by a Stihl rep that their line is covered with something like talc, which keeps the plastic from sticking to itself when it’s rolled tight in the spools. Other manufacturers might do the same, and that might make it difficult to extrude.
I have a Stratasys machine, so I print mostly in ABS. It’s interesting to note that due to the way the feed rollers are designed in that machine, I have not been able to print anything besides ABS and HIPS support material. PLA and Nylon didn’t work at all.
I used to have a Reprap that I built from scratch, and I could print PLA or ABS in it. They both printed ok-ish, even though I didn’t have a heated chamber, though I did obviously have a heated bed. One neat feature of ABS is that when the print is done and cooling, the shrink of the ABS pops your part right off the build plate without having to scrape at it.
I recently bought an Ekocycle (Cube 3D) for $20 off Craigslist, and I’ve been playing with PETG, and will also use it to print PLA. It’s obviously not as nice as the Stratasys, but I can use other materials and due to the way the Cube 3D is built (both the feed rollers AND the hot end tip are built into the cartridge!), I can use weird materials without having to worry about screwing up the printer.
Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)