Improving Cheap SDR Antennas

[VK3YE] knows there are at least two things wrong with the cheap antennas you get with most SDR dongles. First, they are too short. You’d like to have enough to pull out a quarter wavelength on the longest frequency you want to operate. The second problem is there’s no real ground. He fixed both of these problems, as you can see in the video below.

The result might be called an ugly duckling rather than a rubber ducky. But it does seem to work. You could probably come up with something nicer to reseal the base, but the tape does work. A nice 3D printed housing would work, too, and might improve the appearance. We also thought about the goop you use on tool handles.

We actually have simply cut these antennas off and reused the cable and connector to hook up a better antenna. You might get more mileage out of that approach. On the other hand, the magnetic base and reasonably small form factor is pretty attractive.

If you want to do before and after testing, we’d suggest using Python. Or, just bite the bullet and build something that looks like it belongs in a movie.

18 thoughts on “Improving Cheap SDR Antennas

  1. > just bite the bullet and build something that looks like it belongs in a movie.

    But that’s for circular polarization; unless you want to do something with satellites, or very specific directive microwave links (which makes little sense given the RTL-SDR’s frequency range), you don’t need one of them; they are inherently half as good at picking up linearly polarized signals (i.e. most stuff) than a linearly polarized antenna of the same size!

    Karen Rucker did a nice introductory video about antennas: https://hackaday.com/2021/07/15/new-video-series-learning-antenna-basics-with-karen-rucker/ I don’t think she goes into cross-polarization loss in the first video, so but it might be helpful to know the fundamental difference between these antennas :)

  2. Best signal improvement with those antennas – stick it to central heating radiator. It provides big grounded plane and sometimes it’s a difference between almost no signal and very good signal.

  3. The video talks of connecting a “radial”(?), the article about real ground.
    I do not know a lot about these things, but am interested (own a RTL-SDR).
    Can anyone elaborate?

    1. You might also see reference to something called a counterpoise. It’s a wire cut to be quarter-wavelength resonant at a specific frequency and provides an artificial ground at that frequency. Think of it as the bottom half of a dipole.

      1. A Radial and Counterpoise, as used here are the same thing. Neither one necessarily implies it must be 1/4 wavelength long by name. A basic “Ground Plane” Antenna, typically uses a 1/4 WL vertical element and one or more radials (counterpoises) also roughly 1/4 WL long.

  4. I did something similar with my antenna. I peeled the insulating bottom off, but instead of attaching a wire to the bottom I just put it on a cookie sheet. Then it acts like a big monopole antenna. And it provided a good weight so it wouldn’t fall over.
    Seemed to work just fine.

Leave a Reply to mjrippeCancel reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.