Open Source Multimeter Raises The Bar For DIY Tools

Whether you only dabble in electronics as a hobby or it’s your full-time job, there are few tools as indispensable as the multimeter. In fact, we’d be willing to bet nearly everyone reading this site owns at least one of them. But as common and mindbogglingly useful as they may be, they aren’t perfect. Even the high-end models will invariably have some annoyance that only reveals itself once you become intimately acquainted with it.

Most people would just live with those quirks, especially when dealing with a cheaper model. But not [John Duffy]. Deciding nothing but perfection would do, he took every favorite feature he’d ever run into while using other multimeters and combined them into his scratch-built HydraMeter. In the process, he managed to come up with a few new ideas that push this device into a league of its own.

Some of the features of the HydraMeter will look familiar. You might even have them on your own personal meter, such as the wireless removable display module. Other features you’ll wish your meter had, such as the removable cartridge on the front of the device that lets you rapidly swap out a burned fuse. On the other side of the spectrum, there are some esoteric features that might leave you scratching your head. The ability to tell exactly how the meter is configured at a glance thanks to its exclusive use of toggle switches has a certain hacker appeal, but it’s a tricky user interface for most folks.

While the overall design of the HydraMeter may be divisive, one thing we can all agree on is that getting the project to this state took incredible determination. Over the years we’ve only seen a handful of individuals attempt to develop their own multimeters, and even then, none of them approached this level of fit and finish. The fact that [John] has turned all that effort over to the community by releasing his design under the CERN license is truly admirable.

[John] brought the HydraMeter out to Pasadena back in November for Supercon, and it got quite a reaction. And if you don’t like the user interface, it’s not hard to imagine how you could change it. This project has unquestionably pushed the state of the art for open source multimeters forward, and we’re eager to see where it goes from here.

20 thoughts on “Open Source Multimeter Raises The Bar For DIY Tools

  1. From just a glace: Great project!

    The ability to tell exactly how the meter is configured at a glance thanks to its exclusive use of toggle switches has a certain hacker appeal, but it’s a tricky user interface for most folks.

    I think that’d be a no-go for me but the ability to see the meters configuration at a glance triggered an idea:

    Make the big turnswitch of ‘normal’ multimeters transparent and let the whole round window show the configuration – maybe with polarization letting only one symbol shine through or something.

    I’m sure there are some applicable optical tricks.

  2. Interesting design requirements. Interesting design.

    Things I like:
    Low-profile rocker switches.
    Modularity/interchangeability of components
    The license.

    Things I do not like:
    Low-profile rocker switches.
    Modularity/interchangeability of components

    1. And so are Chinese, Japanese, and European Runic symbols till you learn them, or the Latin alphabet as used in English. Or to stick to more programming/maths type elements so are the logical conditional statements, quadratics, differentials…

      Not looked into what all the switches actually mean yet, but if all the configuration is on those rocker switch then once you know it will be at a glance the same way you didn’t have to puzzle out every letter sound to make the words out in this post (at least assuming you are not just learning English). So at least in theory I can agree with that statement, and do consider it potentially superior.

  3. 9th grade electronics lab circa mid-1960s, each student assembled a simple analog meter to have and to hold till death do you part. Fortunately, in my case, it was the meter that died first. I believe it measured DC, AC and ohms. I seem to recall that it chirped with continuity. You had to have a meter to diagnose AM radio faults on the exam. There were 20 lab stations with deliberately faulty radios, broken trace, cold solder joint, fake wire, etc.

  4. You should look at the gear HVAC techs use: lotsa sensors all linked vía BT to a tablet/phone all accesible with a swipe on the screen instead of throwing a web of cables all around the sick AC unit. Even replacing lost refrigerant is now a fire and forget affair.

  5. I can understand having rather specific requirements for a meter. The last two handheld meters I bought were each after much searching and comparing. Two of the critical requirements were that the test leads could be stored on the back of the meter, and that the continuity function either be alone in it’s selection, or be the primary if it shared with something like diode. That last one really made it difficult. The vast majority I looked at had diode as the primary and continuity as the secondary. I was quite spoiled by the Radio Shack that I used for years before it finally bit the dust.

    But now I’ve got a manual range that fits the criteria, and later was able to find an auto-ranging that did as well. And then I went and bought one of those silly bench-top Bluetooth speaker DMMs (not that I use the speaker), and that’s pretty much my main meter now. But hey, at least when I push the continuity button, that’s the first thing that comes up.

  6. Those style rocker switches are notorious for getting dirty and causing all kind of grief. Anyone remember power supplies on computers with those? They could do more than just not turn on! A dirt catching basin with contacts in it covered mostly with something handled whilst getting your hands dirty. Blast out often with shop air.

  7. While I agree the rockers are not user friendly I’d say that might just be a labelling issue.

    I’m going to argue in favor for it because one of my biggest griefs with off-the-shelf meters is the damn knobs. On both cheap and expensive meters I’ve had those knobs lose contact and then the whole thing gets completely buggered cause it can’t tell what mode it’s in.

    Just light pressure on the knob into the board would affect the contact. So I’m glad someone is at least trying something different.

    1. Maybe someone needs to make a hall effect knob. It could be done with a magnetic absolute encoder and a 3D printed housing that provides the detents. That way it wouldn’t rely on physical contact for sensing which mode it is in and if the detents wear out then you just print another detent ring. The detents could even be magnetic too if you really wanted.

  8. As an electrician I hate shunt type current meters, for safety reasons I block that off on those multimeters or preferably I use clamp meters. I have seen a couple of accidents that could have ended a lot worse.

  9. Interesting, although I’d be uncomfortable with those switches and would rather use bistable (step, latching) relays in place of them. Bistable relays need only temporary power, keep their state indefinitely, their state can be read, and can be driven by normal GPIOs and a bjt or mosfet. Once swapped the switches with step relays, one can build a range selector by using a normal incremental encoder and do the rest in software, then add some safety code that say activates the requested range only after the user presses the encoder button for one full second within the two seconds after the range was selected.
    Just a quick 5 minutes idea, but should work.
    Bistable relays are reasonably cheap and can be bought at the usual more reliable sources, roughly $2 to $5 for low power/voltage ones, a bit less on Aliexpress.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.