Brian Krebs

3 Articles

This Week In Security: AI Generated Reports, More AI Generated Reports, GitHub Chaos, And More Linux Vulnerabilities

May 22, 2026 by 11 Comments

Google’s Project Zero demonstrates a new zero-click exploit for the Pixel 10 phones, showing a full escalation from remote to kernel without user interaction. During the investigation Project Zero found unprotected memory access from userspace in the Tensor G5 video processing chip driver, which allows direct write access to kernel memory.

Using previously discovered flaws in media decoding components — in this case CVE-2025-54957 in the Dolby digital audio decoder — Project Zero modified a Pixel 9 attack to work on the Pixel 10, despite newer protections built into the hardware to harden the system against memory corruption.

The author’s takeaway is mixed. Once the bug on Pixel 9 was reported, one could hope that the Android team would look into similar bugs in their newer systems. On the positive side, though, Project Zero reported the vulnerabilities to the Android team in November 2025 and they were patched in February of 2026, 71 days later. That’s 19 days short of the 90-day timeline.

Continue reading “This Week In Security: AI Generated Reports, More AI Generated Reports, GitHub Chaos, And More Linux Vulnerabilities” →

This Week In Security: More State-Sponsored Activity, Spring4Shell

April 1, 2022 by 4 Comments

[Editor’s note: There is a second, fake iteration of this column out today. This is obviously the real column.]

An alert from CISA, combined with an unsealed pair of indictments, sheds some new light on how Russian hackers pursue high-value targets. The key malware here is Triton, essentially a rootkit designed for the Tricon safety systems, widely deployed at refineries and other infrastructure facilities. One of the early deployments of this was to a Saudi oil plant in 2017. This deployment seems to have been botched, as it caused malfunctions and shut the plant down for about a week.

The new information is confirmation that the same operators, out of the “Central Scientific Research Institute of Chemistry and Mechanics”, attempted to target US facilities with the same campaign. The Wired coverage initially struck me as odd, as it detailed how these Russian attackers researched US refineries, looking for the most promising targets. How exactly did US intelligence agencies know about the research habits of agents in Russia? The details of the indictment has the answer: They were researching US refineries by downloading papers from the US Department of Energy. As the IP addresses of this Russian research group is known and tracked, it was easy enough for US agencies to make the connection.

Continue reading “This Week In Security: More State-Sponsored Activity, Spring4Shell” →

Distributed Censorship Or Extortion? The IoT Vs Brian Krebs

September 29, 2016 by 118 Comments

Now it’s official. The particular website that was hit by a record-breaking distributed denial of service (DDOS) attack that we covered a few days ago was that of white-hat security journalist [Brian Krebs]: Krebs on Security.

During the DDOS attack, his site got 600 Gigabits per second of traffic. It didn’t involve amplification or reflection attacks, but rather a distributed network of zombie domestic appliances: routers, IP webcams, and digital video recorders (DVRs). All they did was create HTTP requests for his site, but there were well in excess of 100,000 of these bots.

In the end, [Krebs’] ISP, Akamai, had to drop him. He was getting pro bono service from them to start with, and while they’ve defended him against DDOS attacks in the past, it was costing them too much to continue in this case. An Akamai exec estimates it would have cost them millions to continue defending, and [Brian] doesn’t blame them. But when Akamai dropped the shields, his hosting provider would get slammed. [Krebs] told Akamai to redirect his domain to localhost and then he went dark.

Continue reading “Distributed Censorship Or Extortion? The IoT Vs Brian Krebs” →