Pitch Shifter Makes Your Band Sing Higher

[Markus Gritsch] tipped us off about this little module he built to shift the pitch of audio playback. It uses a PIC 24FJ along with a couple of LM386 amplifier chips to manage the input and output signals. At the push of a button, audio being fed through the device can be modulated to a different key without changing the playback rate. Here it’s being used with a iPod but because this device just sits between an audio source and a signal input we wonder if you can have some fun on the cellphone with this circuit?

Check out the video after the break to hear it in action. We must compliment [Markus] on his layout. We haven’t seen the underside of that protoboard but he’s done a great job of fitting everything into a small area. You can find the schematic for the circuit by following the link at the top of this feature. He took a picture of his hand-drawn plans which saves him time from laying it out with something like KiCAD but still gives us the details that we love to see with your projects.


23 thoughts on “Pitch Shifter Makes Your Band Sing Higher

  1. this is sooo damn great. i have been searching for a very long time for a diy “whammy” footpedal substitute for my bass guitar. i think this is the solution. have i understood right, that it simply fills a buffer of 20ms and reads it at twice the rate than recording? i think this could be implemented using one of the atmega chips i have lying around.

  2. I wonder if this could this be used to reduce stage feedback. Feedback typically occurs at a particular frequency, if the speakers were always outputting audio slightly shifted up, wouldn’t any feedback spin itself out of range and self dampen?

  3. Couldn’t you use an audio frequency range single-sideband radio circuit to shift the pitch up?

    A single-sideband radio basically shifts the pitch of your voice into the MHz range, so I think it would work

  4. @o: you don’t need a complete radio to get that effect, just send your voice into a double balanced mixer and a sinewave into its second input, then filter out the frequencies you don’t need at the output. Cost: about 15 bucks, or less if you can recycle some components.

  5. @qwerty
    In regards to using a (double balanced) mixer, it’s not as straight forward as it might seem – simply said, what mixer does is based on it’s “non-linearity” – output is not a linear function of the input (as what you get from an amplifier where Out=K*Input), but rather a combination of different “exponents” (for example, OUT=K1*Input^2+K2*Input^3…).

    In an ideal case, and very close in a case of a good balanced mixer, that square component is (very) dominant.

    How does it help us and how does it screw things up?

    Let’s say we take two single frequencies as an input, f1 and f2. In a generic case (and I’m oversimplifying the math here, do your homework and google more), they are u1=U1*sin(f1) and u2=U2*sin(f2).

    When you run those two through a mixer, you get

    u = (u1+u2)^2 = u1^2 + 2*u1*u2 + u2^2
    (lets call them A + B + C)

    Voila! As we all know , sin(f1)*sin(f2) = 0.5(sin(f1-f2) + sin(f1+f2)), so mixer produces four components: two with double the original frequencies from A and C and two with f=f1-f2 and f=f1+f2.

    And that’s the beauty and curse of the mixer – we got our music shifted by f2, but at the same time, now we have a mish mash of all those products combined together. Here is an example:

    Our music signal is in the range 100Hz – 10kHz. We want to shift frequency by 1kHz. Running through a mixer, we end up with components

    A … all original frequencies with double the frequency (200Hz – 20kHz)
    C … pitch on double the shifting frequency (2kHz)
    B1… f1+f2 – shifted up by 1kHz (1100Hz – 11kHz) (this is what we wanted to get)
    B2… f1–f2 – 900Hz – 9kHz

    So, what did we get here?

    Problem 1: if f1 and f2 are too close to each other, products of the balancing are too close to filter them out, so you get products overlapping

    Problem 2: linear pitch shifting works only for relatively small shifts. We hear pitch as a chromatic (logarithmic) scale, where the same tone in higher octave is twice the frequency (tone C is 1046Hz, higher octave C is 2092Hz). If we shift all tones equally (let’s say by 500Hz), you get two new tones that are not octave from each other (1546 (tone G) and 2592 (tone D#))

    Not to say that [Markus]’ approach solves Problem 2, but it makes Problem 1 a bit less apparent 

    NOTE (again): above s VERY oversimplified. There is much more, if you really want to get to the bottom, Google is your friend!

  6. SSB modulation is not an option as explained by Miroslav above.

    Time stretching/Pitch shifting is usually done in the frequency domain by a phase vocoder.

    The resampling method used here has the problem that there is a small audible stretching effect.

  7. This is too complicated for my needs…I just need to drop the pitch of a microphone output signal by a couple octaves. No adjustment capabilities, etc. Anyone have any links to something similar?

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.