This Week in Security

258 Articles

This Week In Security: XRP Poisoned, MCP Bypassed, And More

April 25, 2025 by 7 Comments

Researchers at Aikido run the Aikido Intel system, an LLM security monitor that ingests the feeds from public package repositories, and looks for anything unusual. In this case, the unusual activity was five rapid-fire releases of the xrpl package on NPM. That package is the XRP Ledger SDK from Ripple, used to manage keys and build crypto wallets. While quick point releases happen to the best of developers, these were odd, in that there were no matching releases in the source GitHub repository. What changed in the first of those fresh releases?

The most obvious change is the checkValidityOfSeed() function added to index.ts. That function takes a string, and sends a request to a rather odd URL, using the supplied string as the ad-referral header for the HTML request. The name of the function is intended to blend in, but knowing that the string parameter is sent to a remote web server is terrifying. The seed is usually the root of trust for an individual’s cryptocurrency wallet. Looking at the actual usage of the function confirms, that this code is stealing credentials and keys.

The releases were made by a Ripple developer’s account. It’s not clear exactly how the attack happened, though credential compromise of some sort is the most likely explanation. Each of those five releases added another bit of malicious code, demonstrating that there was someone with hands on keyboard, watching what data was coming in.

The good news is that the malicious releases only managed a total of 452 downloads for the few hours they were available. A legitimate update to the library, version 4.2.5, has been released. If you’re one of the unfortunate 452 downloads, it’s time to do an audit, and rotate the possibly affected keys. Continue reading “This Week In Security: XRP Poisoned, MCP Bypassed, And More” →

This Week In Security: No More CVEs, 4chan, And Recall Returns

April 18, 2025 by 7 Comments

The sky is falling. Or more specifically, it was about to fall, according to the security community this week. The MITRE Corporation came within a hair’s breadth of running out of its contract to maintain the CVE database. And admittedly, it would be a bad thing if we suddenly lost updates to the central CVE database. What’s particularly interesting is how we knew about this possibility at all. An April 15 letter sent to the CVE board warned that the specific contract that funds MITRE’s CVE and CWE work was due to expire on the 16th. This was not an official release, and it’s not clear exactly how this document was leaked.

Many people made political hay out of the apparent imminent carnage. And while there’s always an element of political maneuvering when it comes to contract renewal, it’s worth noting that it’s not unheard of for MITRE’s CVE funding to go down to the wire like this. We don’t know how many times we’ve been in this position in years past. Regardless, MITRE has spun out another non-profit, The CVE Foundation, specifically to see to the continuation of the CVE database. And at the last possible moment, CISA has announced that it has invoked an option in the existing contract, funding MITRE’s CVE work for another 11 months.

Continue reading “This Week In Security: No More CVEs, 4chan, And Recall Returns” →

This Week In Security: AI Spam, SAP, And Ivanti

April 11, 2025 by 13 Comments

AI continues to be used in new and exciting ways… like generating spam messages. Yes, it was inevitable, but we now have spammers using LLM to generate unique messages that don’t register as spam. AkiraBot is a Python-powered tool, designed to evade CAPTCHAs, and post sketchy SEO advertisements to web forms and chat boxes around the Internet.

AkiraBot uses a bunch of techniques to look like a legitimate browser, trying to avoid triggering CAPTCHAs. It also runs traffic through a SmartProxy service to spread the apparent source IP around. Some captured logs indicate that of over 400,000 attempted victim sites, 80,000 have successfully been spammed.

Continue reading “This Week In Security: AI Spam, SAP, And Ivanti” →

This Week In Security: Target Coinbase, Leaking Call Records, And Microsoft Hotpatching

April 4, 2025 by 2 Comments

We know a bit more about the GitHub Actions supply chain attack from last month. Palo Alto’s Unit 42 has been leading the charge on untangling this attack, and they’ve just released an update to their coverage. The conclusion is that Coinbase was the initial target of the attack, with the open source agentkit package first (unsuccessfully) attacked. This attack chain started with pull_request_target in the spotbugs/sonar-findbugs repository.

The pull_request_target hook is exceptionally useful in dealing with pull requests for a GitHub repository. The workflow here is that the project defines a set of Continuous Integration (CI) tests in the repository, and when someone opens a new Pull Request (PR), those CI tests run automatically. Now there’s an obvious potential problem, and Github thought of it and fixed it a long time ago. The GitHub Actions are defined right in the repository, and letting any pull request run arbitrary actions is a recipe for disaster. So GitHub always uses actions as they are defined in the repository itself, ignoring any incoming changes in the PR. So pull_request_target is safe now, right? Yes, with some really big caveats.

The simplest security problem is that many projects have build scripts in the repository, and those are not considered part of GitHub Actions by GitHub. So include malicious code in such a build script, make it a PR that runs automatically, and you have access to internal elements like organization and repository secrets and access tokens. The most effective mitigation against this is to require approval before running workflows on incoming PRs.

So back to the story. The spotbugs/sonar-findbugs repository had this vulnerability, and an attacker used it to export secrets from a GitHub Actions run. One of those secrets happened to be a Personal Access Token (PAT) belonging to a spotbugs maintainer. That PAT was used to invite a throwaway account, [jurkaofavak], into the main spotbugs repository. Two minutes after being added, the [jurkaofavak] account created a new branch in spotbugs/spotbugs, and deleted it about a second later. This branch triggered yet another malicious CI run, now with arbitrary Github Actions access rather than just access through a build script. This run leaked yet another Personal Access Token, belonging to a maintainer that worked on both the spotbugs and reviewdog projects. Continue reading “This Week In Security: Target Coinbase, Leaking Call Records, And Microsoft Hotpatching” →

This Week In Security: IngressNightmare, NextJS, And Leaking DNA

March 28, 2025 by 9 Comments

This week, researchers from Wiz Research released a series of vulnerabilities in the Kubernetes Ingress NGINX Controller  that, when chained together, allow an unauthorized attacker to completely take over the cluster. This attack chain is known as IngressNightmare, and it affected over 6500+ Kubernetes installs on the public Internet.

The background here is that web applications running on Kubernetes need some way for outside traffic to actually get routed into the cluster. One of the popular solutions for this is the Ingress NGINX Controller. When running properly, it takes incoming web requests and routes them to the correct place in the Kubernetes pod.

When a new configuration is requested by the Kubernetes API server, the Ingress Controller takes the Kubernetes Ingress objects, which is a standard way to define Kubernetes endpoints, and converts it to an NGINX config. Part of this process is the admission controller, which runs nginx -t on that NGINX config, to test it before actually deploying.

As you might have gathered, there are problems. The first is that the admission controller is just a web endpoint without authentication. It’s usually available from anywhere inside the Kubernetes cluster, and in the worst case scenario, is accessible directly from the open Internet. That’s already not great, but the Ingress Controller also had multiple vulnerabilities allowing raw NGINX config statements to be passed through into the config to be tested. Continue reading “This Week In Security: IngressNightmare, NextJS, And Leaking DNA” →

This Week In Security: The Github Supply Chain Attack, Ransomware Decryption, And Paragon

March 21, 2025 by 4 Comments

Last Friday Github saw a supply chain attack hidden in a popular Github Action. To understand this, we have to quickly cover Continuous Integration (CI) and Github Actions. CI essentially means automatic builds of a project. Time to make a release? CI run. A commit was pushed? CI run. For some projects, even pull requests trigger a CI run. It’s particularly handy when the project has a test suite that can be run inside the CI process.

Doing automated builds may sound straightforward, but the process includes checking out code, installing build dependencies, doing a build, determining if the build succeeded, and then uploading the results somewhere useful. Sometimes this even includes making commits to the repo itself, to increment a version number for instance. For each step there are different approaches and interesting quirks for every project. Github handles this by maintaining a marketplace of “actions”, many of which are community maintained. Those are reusable code snippets that handle many CI processes with just a few options.

One other element to understand is “secrets”. If a project release process ends with uploading to an AWS store, the process needs an access key. Github stores those secrets securely, and makes them available in Github Actions. Between the ability to make changes to the project itself, and the potential for leaking secrets, it suddenly becomes clear why it’s very important not to let untrusted code run inside the context of a Github Action.

And this brings us to what happened last Friday. One of those community maintained actions, tj-actions/changed-files, was modified to pull an obfuscated Python script and run it. That code dumps the memory of the Github runner process, looks for anything there tagged with isSecret, and writes those values out to the log. The log, that coincidentally, is world readable for public repositories, so printing secrets to the log exposes them for anyone that knows where to look.

Researchers at StepSecurity have been covering this, and have a simple search string to use: org:changeme tj-actions/changed-files Action. That just looks for any mention of the compromised action. It’s unclear whether the compromised action was embedded in any other popular actions. The recommendation is to search recent Github Action logs for any mention of changed-files, and start rotating secrets if present. Continue reading “This Week In Security: The Github Supply Chain Attack, Ransomware Decryption, And Paragon” →

This Week In Security: The X DDoS, The ESP32 Basementdoor, And The CamelCase RCE

March 14, 2025 by 9 Comments

We would be remiss if we didn’t address the X Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack that’s been happening this week. It seems like everyone is is trying to make political hay out of the DDoS, but we’re going to set that aside as much as possible and talk about the technical details. Elon made an early statement that X was down due to a cyberattack, with the source IPs tracing back to “the Ukraine area”.

The latest reporting seems to conclude that this was indeed a DDoS, and a threat group named “Dark Storm” has taken credit for the attack. Dark Storm does not seem to be of Ukrainian origin or affiliation.

We’re going to try to read the tea leaves just a bit, but remember that about the only thing we know for sure is that X was unreachable for many users several times this week. This is completely consistent with the suspected DDoS attack. The quirk of modern DDoS attacks is that the IP addresses on the packets are never trustworthy.

There are two broad tactics used for large-scale DDoS attacks, sometimes used simultaneously. The first is the simple botnet. Computers, routers, servers, and cameras around the world have been infected with malware, and then remote controlled to create massive botnets. Those botnets usually come equipped with a DDoS function, allowing the botnet runner to task all the bots with sending traffic to the DDoS victim IPs. That traffic may be UDP packets with spoofed or legitimate source IPs, or it may be TCP Synchronization requests, with spoofed source IPs.

The other common approach is the reflection or amplification attack. This is where a public server can be manipulated into sending unsolicited traffic to a victim IP. It’s usually DNS, where a short message request can return a much larger response. And because DNS uses UDP, it’s trivial to convince the DNS server to send that larger response to a victim’s address, amplifying the attack.

Put these two techniques together, and you have a botnet sending spoofed requests to servers, that unintentionally send the DDoS traffic on to the target. And suddenly it’s understandable why it’s so difficult to nail down attribution for this sort of attack. It may very well be that a botnet with a heavy Ukrainian presence was involved in the attack, which at the same time doesn’t preclude Dark Storm as the originator. The tea leaves are still murky on this one.

Continue reading “This Week In Security: The X DDoS, The ESP32 Basementdoor, And The CamelCase RCE” →