This Cube Is Made For Walkin’


Meet Cubli, a research project which aims to make a cube that can walk around without using any appendages. It’s a research project at the Institute for Dynamic Systems and control in Switzerland. Anyone else thinking about our beloved companion cube right now?

The robotic experiments are based on angular momentum. Inside of the cube there are center mounted motors which each spin a wheel. Three of these are mounted perpendicular to each other to give the cube the ability to change its position along any axis. This is best shown by the first video after the break where just a single side of the assembly is demonstrated. A square frame starts at a rest position. You see the wheel spin up and it is suddenly stopped, which causes the momentum of the wheel to pop the square frame up onto one corner. The wheel then switches into a second mode to keep it balancing there. The final mode is a controlled fall. This theoretically will let the cube move around by falling end over end. So far they’re not showing off that ability, but the second demo video does show the assembled cube balancing on one corner.

[Reddit via Robohub]

32 thoughts on “This Cube Is Made For Walkin’

  1. It’s really an awesome project but I can’t see an application for but that hasn’t stopped me from doing projects because “I can”. Maybe an amusement park ride, obviously on a bigger scale. Any takers for an application for this?

    1. Many of these seemingly useless projects turn up algorithms and physics understanding that can be applied in more useful fields.

      Take the ping-pong-playing quadcopters, those are pretty much useless but the research is aimed at making autonomous vehicles with near-instant reaction to the environment.

      1. The problem in reaction wheels is that you need to unload it regularly. You can spin it up to stop satellite rotating, but you can’t spin it down because the breaking force to the wheel will be converted to original spin again. Got spin -> use wheels -> fire thrusters -> stop wheels. But thrusters on CubeSats are difficult because they are small and gases and fuels are not allowed on most(if not all) piggyback launches. There are alternatives like magnetorquers or aerodynamic tethers. I don’t know how much of CubeSats have 3-axis stabilization, but I believe there aren’t many.

  2. Want.

    This will probably benefit from scaling down, there’s a sweet point somewhere where you can run it off internal batteries.

    The folks at should have thought about this approach.

    1. Batteries would be rather heavy.. .so something along the lines of using cells positioned as a flywheel, and have brush connectors to transfer the power might be better than having both a flywheel wight and a battery weight.

      1. I’d guess that’s bad for the chemistry. Or the internal structure of the cells. There’s a lot of G in a wheel spinning fast enough to have an effect. That, and you wouldn’t want battery packs slipping off and flying round the room at people.

          1. i think the bigger problem is to get the same angular momentum you either have to spin fast which could potentially cause an issue since your “flyweels” wouldnt have an even mass distribution potentially causing wobble. You could slow it but you’d add significant weight. I know there is a similar project at the UCSD Robotics lab using 4 CMGs for locomotion and i think they are using a bunch of batteries that are opposite of eachother to keep the weight as uniform as possible.

      2. could do away with the brush contacts for power if the motor+driver was mounted on the flywheel itself, and the axel went to the main body

        each fly wheel would be a motor with its own battery, with the axel just mounted to the central frame, leaving low-power control signals over the brushes

  3. This is certainly interesting but it doesn’t strike me as the most efficient way of moving about. Sort of like when Mythbusters fitted square wheels on a vehicle, yes it’s it interesting, fun even but not terribly useful for driving around.

  4. Your Companion Cube cannot accompany you through the rest of the test. If it could talk – and the Enrichment Center takes this opportunity to remind you that it cannot – it would tell you to go on without it, because it would rather die in a fire than become a burden to you.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.