Custom VR Headset Uses Unconventional Displays

Cathode ray tubes (CRTs) are a fascinating display technology that has been largely abandoned outside of retro gaming and a few other niche uses. They use magnets to steer a beam of electrons rapidly across a screen, and while a marvel of engineering for their time, their expense, complexity, and weight all led to them being largely replaced by other displays like LCDs and LEDs. They were also difficult to miniaturize, but there were a few companies who tried. [dooglehead] located a few of the smallest CRT displays he could find and got to work putting them in the most unlikely of situations: a virtual reality headset.

The two displays for his headset come from Sony Watchmans, compact over-the-air black-and-white handheld televisions from the late 1900s. [dooglehead] had to create a method for sending video to these units which originally had no input connections, and then also used an FPGA to split a video signal into two parts, with one for each display. The two displays are placed side by side and attached to a Google Cardboard headset, with an off-the-shelf location tracker attached at the top. An IMU tracks head rotation while this location tracker tracks the motion of the unit through 3D space.

With everything assembled and ready to go, the CRT VR headset only weighs in a few grams heavier than [dooglehead]’s modern HTC headset, although it’s lacking a case (which is sorely needed to cover up the exposed high voltage of the CRTs). He reports surprisingly good performance, with notable interlacing and focus issues. He doesn’t plan to use it to replace any of his modern VR displays anytime soon, but it was an interesting project nonetheless. There are some rumors that CRTs are experiencing a bit of a revival, so we’d advise anyone looking to toss out an old CRT to at least put it on an online market place before sending it to a landfill.

16 thoughts on “Custom VR Headset Uses Unconventional Displays

  1. I feel very old for making this critique, but I find it crazy that he seemingly didn’t know about (or at least address the choice not to use) CRT camcorder viewfinders, which offered the same or better quality in a genuinely tiny package, and could (at least in my experience messing with sony handycams) be driven with nothing more than a composite signal and a +5v (or at least no more than 12v) power source.

      1. Thank you for the information. :)

        Man, I really miss the 90s. The 90s were such fun, optimistic times!

        Back then, the average PC builder knew how to use a soldering iron (more or less).
        Probably because of the previus home computer era, where the skill still was sort of a requirement.

        Too bad VR didn’t catch on as much as it should back then.
        The time was perfect. The early internet and “cyber space” theme did fit nicely.

        Speaking of 90s VR, the Forte VFX-1 and similar cyber helmets shouldn’t be forgotten, I think.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y44pPRydc5s

        This site has some more information about 90s era VR tech and standards: http://www.stereo3d.com/

        Btw, the “PCVR Magazine” had published some articles at the time. IA has some issues.
        https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22PCVR+Magazine%22

    1. I’ve seen a lot of projects using viewfinder CRTs, and think they’re pretty cool. The main reason I didn’t use them in this VR headset is that they would be too small, which would result in a narrow FOV. The 2.7″ display size on the Watchman CRTs I used is more similar to the size of the LCD/OLED panels used in commercial headsets and other DIY headsets. I wouldn’t be surprised if the image quality was better on viewfinder CRTs though. Element14’s Youtube channel has a video of a headset they made with viewfinder CRTs if you want to see what that would look like. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p12QaZUZDnM

        1. How would you refer to the latter part of a century? “Late 1700s” referring to the end of the 18th century is extremely common usage.

          Imo ‘bi-weekly’ is much more ambiguous and confusing

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.